[cranked]

Already has....to the IMF.

[combat_boots]

Related:

“The Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty Draft – wealth transfer defined, now with new and improved ‘dignity’ penalty”

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/03/the-copenhagen-treaty-draft-wealth-transfer-defined-now-with-dignity-penalty/

“Linking health, wealth, and well being with the use of energy” 12 October 2009

“Has Industrialization Diminished the Well-Being of Developing Nations and are Industrialized Countries Responsible?”

Guest post by: Indur M. Golanky

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/12/linking-health-wealth-and-well-being-with-the-use-of-energy/

[Texas Fossil]

Nothing surprises me anymore.

[Fred Nerks]

thanks for posting, I nearly missed it!

---

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.

I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.

[laughter]

And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic), and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.

But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.

So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:

Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!

[LucyT]

Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord

.

.

Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it.

Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.

And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created.

The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity.

The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t.

And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement..

How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand.

They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it.

[snip]

In the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever.

And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is.

.

[IrishPennant]

And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is.

The largest armed civilian population in the world may differ!!!!

[Quix]

Already a done deal by increments over the last several decades . . . some say deliberately since the beginning 200 years ago.

[wildandcrazyrussian]

US Constitution:

"Article II. Section 2.

...He [the President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur;..."

Consequently, it would seem that Obama can sign anything he wants but has to get a 2/3 vote of Senators to ratify it. That raises the interesting question of whether he or his dark forces would be ruthless enough to threaten enough Senators, or make enough of them absent on the day of vote, to exceed the threshold of "two thirds of the Senators present".

In that case, Article VI would be in operation:

"...all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land;..."

In that case, this proposed relinquishment of national sovereignty by means of the treaty being signed in December, with subsequent fraudulent ratification soon thereafter, WILL be the flashpoint leading to a new civil war. This far outweighs the health care issue or anything else we can conceive.

[sport]

I cou;d have told you that on November 5, 2008.

Why do you think that all the traitors and American haters voted for him?

[thouworm]

linked thread

Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2363537/posts

[uncitizen]

Our friends in Great Britain, Canada and Australia and even France have been the ones reporting these things and trying to wake us up. They are worried about us.

Come on American media! Wake up!!! Stop thinking about your damn jobs. This is bigger than you! And you are dispensible! We’re all dispensible.

[WKUHilltopper]

This is treason...