Posted on 09/14/2009 9:09:33 PM PDT by FARS
Early Discovery Video
(Excerpt) Read more at antimullah.com ...
“Rush just mentioned the Birth Certificate... while talking about the Obama museum in Kenya”
Did he say it was prominently displayed?
Absolutely untrue. I just views about 10 sites showing the entire divorce decree, and I read every word. All it states is that they had a son Barak Hussien Obama II, it does not state his birth place.
But, prove me wrong, show me where it states he is born in Mombasa, Kenya in the divorce document.
right...I wasn’t trying to say he’s leaning either way. I’m asking that IF he was leaning towards granting the MTD, WOULD he encourage early discovery...that’s all.
It just seems that the encouragement for early discovery ‘seems’ to imply he’s not going to grant the MTD.
He did make a comment that what the defense is using as their reason for an MTD is rarely granted. Now, I realize he had not read ALL of the reasons but he sited that rule 12b on jurisdication, etc., that the defense had referenced and said that probably wouldn’t fly.
Regardless, I pray that this judge has the wisdom of GOD and moves forward on this, forcing Obama to be exposed for the fraud he is.
I agree. That’s why I was asking what the organization making the claims was. Looks like it was just another flaky website.
BOR has the worst research of any show on FOX. They get an inbox stuffed with information every day but ignore it all. I’m finished with him for good. He is intentionally ignorant.
bttt
And you are you are referring to this.
------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff(s), v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET. AL.,
Defendant(s),
CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET. AL.,
CASE NO. SA CV09-0082-DOC(ANx)
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR OCTOBER 5, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.
-snip-
"...Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party
the Court would order that any or all discovery is
premature, the Court encourages the parties to begin
discovery before the Scheduling Conference. The parties
shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Rule 26(a)
and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be
produced in the early stages of discovery, because at the
Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines
to complete discovery. RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE OF PARTIES
Counsel shall confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 26(f). This conference shall occur at least
twenty-one (21) days before the Scheduling Conference set
by the Court. RULE 26(f) REPORT The parties shall file
their Rule 26(f) report with the Court no later than
fourteen (14) days prior to the Scheduling Conference set
by the Court. The report shall contain the following: (1)
(2) (3) a short factual summary of the case and of claims
and defenses.
- end snip -
Excellent Reply, you beat me to it. A lawyer friend said the same thing. In fact, I believe that the Obots know this as well, but attempt to throw a monkey wrench into the works, by sewing doubt.
Won’t work. Orly Taits is focused. My friend said that she is on a mission. Make no mistake, she is a bulldog. Anyone that tries to say she is a bad lawyer, is wrong, there are language problems, but her papers are succinct. Lawyers know what papers are supposed to be filed with an action. They know basically what is supposed to be in each action, so are not as critical as non-lawyer types and wordsmiths. Were documents are not filed, generally word is given by law clerks, other lawyers, or even the judge. The baby does not get thrown out with the bathwater.
Orly wants people that do not add to the effectiveness of the case, like Kreep (who is not serious enough about the case, to her) off the case. Even Kreep has agreed.
Don’t underestimate this woman. Look at who discredits her, and most importantly, why they discredit her, and what credentials that they have TO discredit her, and most of it goes away.
from Orly Taits
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4327
Last point -Gary Kreep . It is very similar to Berg. Last year when I initiated Keyes v Bowen (secretary of state of CA), Drake and Robinson have recommended that I work with Kreep. Originally I thought it was a good idea, but soon I could see that he only creates an illusion of fighting Obama, but he is not really doing it. When we were supposed to file our case, he went to Vegas for a week and then to DC for the weekend. When we were supposed to be in court, he went to HI for 12 days and showed up 1 day before the electoral college meeting, scheduled the hearing for March, when it was too late to do anything against the Secretary of State and when Superior Court judge Keeney has dismissed it as moot.
there is much more at the link if you care to read...
Thank you, NorwegianViking. The Blue “Ping” is my creation and was designed just for The Ping List.
Thanks I caught it a little while ago. Nice to hear her side.
Everyone presumed that everyone before them had done their job. They did not do their job by verifying it. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Howard Dean signed documents that confirmed obama had been vetted by the DNC, when in fact, by later statements, they did not check either, but were signing Normal paperwork. Nobody vetted him properly. Calls to vett him were made 6 months before the election and were ignored.
So no, I do not think he was vetter properly or completely, and as a result, a lot of people are in trouble, and many may go to jail as a result. But JMO
The defense filed a Motion to Limit Discovery last Thursday. They won't need to cooperate with Taitz until the judge rules on that motion. It's interesting to note that Gary Kreep has filed a Response to the Motion to Limit Discovery, but Taitz has not. I'm not sure she's even aware of it.
I have not followed it that closely. I was not aware of the pleadings.
I admitted to someone; maybe you! That I have not followed the actual pleadings so thanks.
You can go to Scribid and search on Keyes v Obama and it’ll give you every document filed in the case to date, transcripts, the whole nine yards.
I believe that bho senior killed himself in a drunk driving accident.
It would be surprising if he didn't! If proved, this would be devastating for Obama -- and his acolytes in the media.
That’s what Rev Manning said. He stated that BHO Sr was an alcoholic and lost his legs in a drunk driving accident and died in the second one.
Saw it from a number of different sources.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.