Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WILL THESE TWO DOCUMENTS THROW PELOSI AND TOP DEMOCRATS INTO FELONY PRISON?
Anti-Mullah ^ | 9-1-09 | Anti-Mullah

Posted on 09/02/2009 8:04:37 PM PDT by Danae

Pelosi signed two Official Certifications of Nomination for Obama and Biden at the DNC Convention last August. Read the language carefully and note the difference between them:
SECOND ONE (WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION)

WHY WAS THE CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENCE REMOVED ?

Fred Nerks SAYS: "Just thinking out aloud here, see what you think":

Every copy I have seen online of an Hawaii CoLB has shown the place of birth as Oahu, County Honolulu. Isn’t that a little odd? Surely one or two should be from another island or another county?

Makes me think that ALL Certifications of Live Birth, Accepted OR Filed, bear that same information. (Until someone shows something different, anyway).

So, the original birth certificate for a child born in Hawaii shows the details relevant to the birth, and can be amended,(CHANGE OF NAME, ADOPTION ETC.,) with amendements shown only on the original.

Or, a late Certification could be applied for, (up until 1972 IIRC) whereby an out-of-state birth could be registered, and FILED. Again, this information remains on the original document...

When a ‘copy’, a Certification of Live Birth is requested, it’s by no means a ‘copy’ of the original birth certificate, it’s simply a standard form on which, as we know, the parents, the parents Race and the name of the child are shown.

Are you with me? The Place of Birth OAHU and the County HONOLULU may simply relate to the location of the OFFICE where the document was issued.

Therefor every CoLB shows the same, Place of Birth OAHU, County, HONOLULU.

AND THAT MAKES EVERYONE WHO HAS A COLB A CITIZEN OF THE US???

The next question might be, just how many people does this apply to? Thousands?


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: article2section1; bcrepository; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; citizenship; dnc; eligibility; fraud; hawaii; honolulu; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; oahu; obama; occidental; pelosi; unconstitutional; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Danae; thouworm

what you have printed here in the comments is an excerpt I provided on a previous thread. Here is the source:

http://www.thecommentary.net/the-occidental-obama-a-pawn-in-the-game/


41 posted on 09/02/2009 10:34:44 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

What boat?


42 posted on 09/02/2009 11:45:51 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; Danae

obumpa


43 posted on 09/02/2009 11:53:24 PM PDT by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Lookie here, someone has combined your posted document images with a comment of mine and an excerpt of an article without quoting a source and made what we in Oz would call a dog’s breakfast out of the Post.


44 posted on 09/03/2009 12:24:02 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae

That the guy was a Communist member and a Pedophile.


45 posted on 09/03/2009 3:20:14 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

WOW ...

Are you the author of the text after the Pelosi bc’s regarding Occidental, federal funds, etc. ?


46 posted on 09/03/2009 7:18:11 AM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Fred Nerks; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; ...

Just keep digging and posting....Someone is reading the information and it will get out sooner or later ...

Circumcism material even made it into an Alaskan source...Shows where their minds are....Mine was purely researched.;~)


47 posted on 09/03/2009 7:36:34 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

That is what I was thinking!

Bloody well thought through too!


48 posted on 09/03/2009 8:05:30 AM PDT by Danae (- Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; STARWISE

Does anyone else find it interesting that the BC case in California is scheduled for Sept. 9th and suddenly Obama is scheduling his big propaganda speech to our children for the 8th and his propaganda speech to the joint session for the 9th?

Things that make you go hmmmmm....which we are doing alot of these days.


49 posted on 09/03/2009 8:07:17 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Does anyone else find it interesting that the BC case in California is scheduled for Sept. 9th and suddenly Obama is scheduling his big propaganda speech to our children for the 8th and his propaganda speech to the joint session for the 9th?


? ? ?
The hearing is scheduled for the 8th, not the 9th. And the only issues that will be addressed at the hearing is
(a) Whether Orly has properly served Obama and the other defendants;
(b) Whether Orly acted improperly in attempting to dismiss Wiley Drake and Markum Robinson from the case when they sought to substitute Gary Kreep as counsel;
(c) Whether the magistrate judge properly struck a discovery motion Orly filed because it failed to follow the rules; and
(d) Whether the magistrate judge should be recused from the case (for bias evidenced, says Orly, by his order striking her motion from the record).

If Judge Carter actually does end up hearing this case “on the merits,” sometime in the future, your comment would make sense. But why would Obama care about a hearing that’s primarily focused on ORLY - and whether her various actions and motions in the case have been proper/properly filed ? ? ?


50 posted on 09/03/2009 9:04:50 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan; penelopesire

Because there are already two MSM covering the hearing: CNN and FOX.

Trying to make “bigger” news to coverup the story or at least limit its exposure.


51 posted on 09/03/2009 9:08:45 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

Have you read ALinsky’s Rules? If you have read a book called ELEANA, it was written by a Greek-AMerican in search of how his mother was killed by the communists when they took over Greece. It goes step by step in how it’s done. ANd it parallels what is happening in the USA now.


52 posted on 09/03/2009 9:11:13 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Trying to make “bigger” news to coverup the story or at least limit its exposure.


Ok .. but I don’t get it. The “news” is going to be about whether or not Orly acted improperly with respect to her clients and whether Orly properly filed some papers. The “news” is not going to be about Obama.


53 posted on 09/03/2009 9:14:29 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I haven’t yet read Alinsky’s Rules, but keep seeing it referenced, so I guess I will soon. I’ll look for ELEANA too - thanks for the recommendation - I love books!


54 posted on 09/03/2009 9:15:23 AM PDT by Sibre Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

No. Democrats are exempt from the law. Until they become expendable.


55 posted on 09/03/2009 9:16:46 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

Here’s a shortened version of the rules:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2308852/posts


56 posted on 09/03/2009 10:13:28 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: theKid51; Apple Blossom

ping


57 posted on 09/03/2009 10:23:23 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Liberals feed on dead Senators and babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

“Trying to make “bigger” news to coverup the story or at least limit its exposure”

BINGO!!


58 posted on 09/03/2009 11:06:51 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

“The “news” is going to be about whether or not Orly acted improperly with respect to her clients and whether Orly properly filed some papers. The “news” is not going to be about Obama.”

It doesn’t matter..any ‘news’ on the whole BC issue is ALL ABOUT OBAMA in the final analysis. Obama and his handlers are trying to deflect any attention to this hearing by trying to make bigger news on the same day and the day before.

BTW..Obama’s propaganda speech to all of the children in America is the 8th..his speech to a joint session of Congress is the 9th. and the hearing(according to this thread) is the 9th.


59 posted on 09/03/2009 11:15:09 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: devane617
My money says she has no problem floating at all :)
60 posted on 09/03/2009 12:09:29 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Obama's Blackberry, who's on the other end?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson