The clock is ticking on the Obama illegitimate presidency. Watch how the MSM and the Obot bloggers attack this 'smoking gun.'
1 posted on
08/02/2009 4:19:18 PM PDT by
jdoug666
To: jdoug666
author needs a comma or two.
2 posted on
08/02/2009 4:23:09 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(The revolution IS being televised.)
To: jdoug666
Is he cooko for cocoa puffs?
3 posted on
08/02/2009 4:25:44 PM PDT by
allmost
To: jdoug666
Read the webpage-interesting take.
4 posted on
08/02/2009 4:26:49 PM PDT by
Republic
(Ubama OWES Sgt Crowley a HUGE APOLOGY right away...if he can man up, he will do this immediately)
To: jdoug666
6 posted on
08/02/2009 4:30:36 PM PDT by
silverleaf
(If you can't be a good example, at least don't be a horrible lesson)
To: jdoug666
Stanley Ann’s timeline is odd with respect to her schooling in Washington and Hawaii.
10 posted on
08/02/2009 4:36:56 PM PDT by
machogirl
(If Obama's handing out Pie, I like Lemon Meringue.)
To: jdoug666
To: jdoug666
Hahahahahah
nuts, nuts i tell you
15 posted on
08/02/2009 4:43:38 PM PDT by
aristotleman
(....in wolves' clothing....stealing ur prey.....)
To: jdoug666
How long has this alledged Kenyan Certificate been out there? Where did it come from? And how do we know its not itself a forgery?
Look, I'm all for getting to the bottom of this stuff. Along the way we should avoid being either too accomodating or too skeptical of evidence either for or against Obama's legitamacy.
There are too many who want to accept one or another conclusion blindly.
To: jdoug666
The author is guessing that the papers come from the lawyers in the Obama divorce case.
If that proves to be so, then that's indeed a strong provenance for this document.
However, I don't believe that the author has shown that there is any compelling reason to think this, although it clearly is not an unreasonable speculation.
22 posted on
08/02/2009 5:04:50 PM PDT by
snowsislander
(NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
To: jdoug666
I guess I have not been keeping up. I don't understand this comment:
we still do not know how a non pregnant looking Stanley Ann in swim suit dropped an 8 pound kid a few months later, but nothing in this has made any sense from the start.
27 posted on
08/02/2009 5:27:52 PM PDT by
brytlea
(Jesus loves me, this I know.)
To: jdoug666
I believe I know where this document originated from...I'm not sure how much credence I would give anyone who can't even control English syntax.
As opposed to " originated to?"
32 posted on
08/02/2009 5:32:42 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
To: jdoug666
Almost as good as writing done by retarded monkeys.
To: jdoug666
If it is real and proved irrefutably true it will make no difference. The Social Democrats and certain Republicans and conservative pundits will excoriate those who bring it forth and it will be simply politically ignored. Or, Hussein will admit to it and say well you can’t do anything about it and nothing will be done about it. An article of the Constitution will be officially abrogated and the rest of the Constitution will no longer have the standing that it still has. It has been ignored and violated much but never before with official the sanction it will get if Hussein now owns up to Kenyan birth.
39 posted on
08/02/2009 6:04:13 PM PDT by
arthurus
("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
To: jdoug666
grammar sucks but the angle of the questioning is interesting.
41 posted on
08/02/2009 6:51:28 PM PDT by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If the Average nObama Voter is Anything Like Peggy Joseph, The Next 4 Years Will Be A Hoot!!!!)
To: jdoug666
What I find troubling about this document is the part where it says: Number of Previous Issue - Living/Deceased, and, as far as I can tell, it is filled in "all" to both (Living and Deceased, that is). Since "issue" means the other children of these parents, I would have expected it to say "0" in both places. The fact that it says "all" makes no sense ("all" of the other children of these parents are Living AND "all" of the other children of these parents are Deceased).
Makes me think whoever filled this form in doesn't know what the word "issue" means in the context it is used here.
To: jdoug666
The real issue is that regardless of where Obama was born, he was a British citizen at birth through his father as his citizenship was governed under the British Nationality Act of 1948. He admitted as much on his official Fight the Smears website. The question, to paraphrase from Leo Donofrio, Esq., is this: How can a natural born United States citizen be governed at birth by British/foreign citizenship law?
48 posted on
08/03/2009 3:20:06 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(If we're an Empire, why are Cuba, Iraq, Philippines, Japan & Germany independent?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson