Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Polarik; MHGinTN; DavidFarrar

You and many others have made a great effort to demonstrate this may be the largest scam in recorded history

Whether it is the largest scam, depends on whether O was born in Hawaii.

I say this only because any review by the USSC will likely be greatly influenced by the fact the Republican attorneys serving in the Congress, were not in the least troubled on January 8 by the well-publicized fact O’s father was not a U.S. citizen.

Even if O was born in Hawaii, his refusal to perform the Constitutionally-mandated duty of qualifying for the office is nonetheless a needless and expensive scam.

The case is simple, really.
In the first instance, O childishly does not want to tell us whether he was born in Hawaii but he must be made to perform his Constitutional duty.

What does it take to move forward?

Republican politicians with some guts and a sense of duty, who will understand the oath they swear to defend the Constitution. And, we must conclude, they are not now in office. (Do not tell me it is hurtful to offend our political leaders, where have they been on this issue?)

Do we go out tomorrow and find replacement candidates?

Do we cleanse the party by requiring candidates in 2010 to specifically commit to taking effective legal action on this specific issue (a la Newt’s contract)?
Do we have time for that?

Do we make the issue the center of an increasing number of “tea parties”?

Or do we kick back and see how “others” work it out, if at all?


72 posted on 06/16/2009 3:50:47 PM PDT by frog in a pot (Socialism and facism violate the Constitution and are "domestic enemies".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: frog in a pot; Polarik; BP2; Beckwith; LucyT; Fred Nerks; Jim Robinson
"Whether it is the largest scam, depends on whether O was born in Hawaii." Absolutely and unequivocally WRONG! But that was a nice try. The affirmative action figure could have been born in the Oval Office and it would not change the fact that he has offered a forgery, on the Internet, stated through minions that the forgery came from the state of Hawaii official records keepers, and continued to lie and dissemble and use lawyers and detectives and threats through federal judges to keep his scam from being exposed fully thus implicating even the demcorat aprty in his criminality.

You further try o dissemble the issue with, "I say this only because any review by the USSC will likely be greatly influenced by the fact the Republican attorneys serving in the Congress ..." WRONG again, but carefully craft!

The SCOTUS has one very clear task which the Roberts court has consciouslt chosen to side-step: to tender a ruling as to whether the term natural born citizen as used in the Constitution means two parents, born on US soil or not on US soil.

And finally, I find it is quite suspicious that you try the following obliqueness:
"... Republican politicians with some guts and a sense of duty, who will understand the oath they swear to defend the Constitution. And, we must conclude, they are not now in office. (Do not tell me it is hurtful to offend our political leaders, where have they been on this issue?)"

The party of sitting Republican politicians is irrelevent. The issue is between the federal judiciary and we the people via our now very much in doubt Constitutional contract. Your characterization of the issues as clear and present danger when the bastard's vote tally was received I shall address in a moment.

The current resident of the Oval office has used a form of extortion to exquisite effect, in tendering his criminal ascendency to the presidency. The implied threat is racial rioting and mayhem if he is not allowed to continue with his criminal scam. Well I, for one, am more than willing to allow racially motivated criminals to burn down cities, if it means the single thing making this Republic legal is restored to the proper importance.

If we the people can be ignored so easily in order to allow a criminal racist thug to take the oval office while the 'subpreme' court effectively runs interference for him, then the Constitutional Republic is no more because the contract that was the Constitution has been abrogated to allow an affirmative action thug to commit criminal fraud in order to extort the highest office of power.

Your little scam of implying all sitting Republicans must be made to answer for the criminality of this lying bastard democrat is a telling subtle ploy to have folks just shut up and go along for now so the apple cart will not be overturned. Shove that!

If democrats want to continue to aid and abet this criminal bastard protected from answering for his criminal fraud, they are the ones whom should be tossed from office en masse ... and impeached then removed, if they were not the criminal enterprise now holding all the cards of power!

The extreme criminal nature of this fraudulent president was not so well documented and exposed as you would like to portray before the election results were counted.

The complicit Roberts court gave this bastard cover that was at least confusing to the average citizen and elected Republican. But you can bet there are democrats sitting in powerful offices who knew damned well that this liar was not eligible but they chose to play the race hustle threats and get him into power at any cost.

Now, want to try again with your not so subtle ploys?

73 posted on 06/16/2009 4:40:34 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: frog in a pot
What Constitutional duty? Sure the Constitution says "natural born" but it neither gives a definition, nor, any enforcement mechanism, as I understand it. We are left with raising the consciousness of the people as to what is actually going on and for that we need to get our facts in order. Whenever I get some good, substantiated fact on this issue nailed down, I go to Talking Point Memo and hit 'um again, and again, and keep hitting them until the voices get too loud to ignore. ex animo davidfarrar
76 posted on 06/16/2009 5:17:30 PM PDT by DavidFarrar (Constitution, 2nd Amendment,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson