Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The SPSS Drug Smuggling Ships (VIDEO)
Friends of Ours ^

Posted on 04/25/2009 8:18:49 AM PDT by AtlasStalled

David Kushner from The New York Times reports on the increasing use by Colombian cocaine traffickers of self-propelled semi-submersible (SPSS) water craft to ship their loads into the United States:

This kind of vessel — a self-propelled, semisubmersible made by hand in the jungles of Colombia — is no longer quite so mythic: four were intercepted in January alone. But because of their ability to elude radar systems, these subs are almost impossible to detect; only an estimated 14 percent of them are stopped. And perhaps as many as 70 of them will be made this year, up from 45 or so in 2007, according to a task-force spokesman. Made for as little as $500,000 each and assembled in fewer than 90 days, they are now thought to carry nearly 30 percent of Colombia’s total cocaine exports.

(Excerpt) Read more at bitterqueen.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Society
KEYWORDS: columbia; drugs; smuggling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2009 8:18:49 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

wow... they tried this with marihuana but it didn’t work. the smoke stack could be seen for miles. rofl


2 posted on 04/25/2009 8:20:40 AM PDT by Ancient Drive (will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

All the terrorist need is the will ...


3 posted on 04/25/2009 8:23:16 AM PDT by Tarpon (You abolish your responsibilities, your surrender your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Innovative.


4 posted on 04/25/2009 8:28:31 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
It's interesting the the news report indicated that such a vessel is outlawed.

Just goes to show that passing laws doesn't change much, though some believe that at least they are doing something.

5 posted on 04/25/2009 8:30:12 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I wonder if the law includes low profile duck hunting boats?


6 posted on 04/25/2009 8:34:57 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
Stealthy visually and on radar perhaps, but I'd bet a weeks pay they stick out like a sore thumb on sonar. Time for a bit of Navy target practice. Of course we need to roll out some less expensive torpedoes. I wonder why the enviro nazi’s aren't up in arms over the smugglers dumping drugs in the ocean? And just how does Congress get to decide that certain vessels are illegal?
7 posted on 04/25/2009 8:36:41 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 163)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

Windsurfer boards without a sail? Personal submarines?


8 posted on 04/25/2009 8:46:52 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger
Speaking of sore thumbs, how stealthy could these yachts be in the clear waters of the keys, the Caribbean, or the Gulf?

Need more specs. Hull material? Power? Speed? Any armament? An anti-tank rocket into a CG cutter could wreak havoc.

And, what exactly do you charge the crew with after they scuttle the damn thing, taking the evidentiary contraband to the bottom? Why not real subs?

9 posted on 04/25/2009 8:54:04 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2; All
It's interesting the the news report indicated that such a vessel is outlawed.
Just goes to show that passing laws doesn't change much, though some believe that at least they are doing something.


Apparently the law is based more on the vessel not having a “nationality” in US waters —

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.3351:

10 posted on 04/25/2009 8:56:20 AM PDT by az_gila (AZ - need less democrats - one Governor down... more to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger
I wonder why the enviro nazi’s aren't up in arms over the smugglers dumping drugs in the ocean?

They don't want their supply interrupted.

11 posted on 04/25/2009 9:08:28 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Hmmm..I’ve got some ideas..dya suppose the DEA will pay a bounty for successful interception???


12 posted on 04/25/2009 9:11:45 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
And, what exactly do you charge the crew with after they scuttle the damn thing, taking the evidentiary contraband to the bottom?

I saw a televised piece on these things a couple of nights ago......they're able to scuttle within seconds, and the "crew" gets a free ride home.

The Coast Guard admits that with the zillions of square miles, they'd have to be pretty much on top of one to spot it, and very fortunate to be able to snag it.

13 posted on 04/25/2009 9:15:28 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (Impeach now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

When the article said “self-propelled”, for some reason I was thinking it might be a robotic vehicle with no crew. Maybe that’s the next step.


14 posted on 04/25/2009 9:17:33 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

i think it means it is not towed. i under stand early version were towed behind and below regular boats. now apparently they have there own motors


15 posted on 04/25/2009 9:22:49 AM PDT by dhm914
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: az_gila

They could gig ‘em on on having no navigation lights. No “papers” for the crew. Carrying contraband. There’s all sorts of extant law they could use. But no, they needed something additional?


16 posted on 04/25/2009 9:24:53 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mo
"DEA will pay a bounty for successful interception"

Letter of Marque. It's in the Constitution. Good luck getting a 'rat Congress to go along.

17 posted on 04/25/2009 9:26:33 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny
Drug sub


18 posted on 04/25/2009 9:31:27 AM PDT by Calpernia (DefendOurFreedoms.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Anoreth

drug interdiction ping


19 posted on 04/25/2009 9:36:37 AM PDT by Tax-chick (O hai. Do I need you for something right now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

yup. must be shocking for MSM to see criminals break the laws... lol


20 posted on 04/25/2009 10:16:55 AM PDT by Ancient Drive (will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson