The Unjust and Unconstitutional Trial of Rod Blagojevich

On Monday, January 26, 2009, the impeachment trial of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich begins. Nominally, the trial will be held by the Illinois Senate with the Chief Justice of the Illinois Supreme Court presiding. In reality, this case is, and always has been, under the control of U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.

The impeachment process started just days after Fitzgerald held his now famous press conference on December 9, 2008, in which Fitzgerald announced that Blagojevich was guilty of various crimes while in office, most spectacularly the attempt to sell Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat.

The charge was made in a press conference, and in a criminal complaint and supporting affidavit. During the press conference, Fitzgerald went to great lengths to quote colorful language by Blagojevich, making a point of inserting the term "bleep" into the quoted transcripts.

Fitzgerald could have brought the charges, and thereby thwarted any attempt by Blagojevich, without the highly inflammatory theatrics at the press conference. The press conference was the first step in Fitzgerald removing Blagojevich from office.

The press conference made great theater, and poisoned the public against Blagojevich as Fitzgerald must have intended, but revealed very little of the evidence. At this point, a month and a half later, there still has been no indictment.

Fitzgerald has obtained an extension of time until early April 2009 to bring an indictment, allowing him to maintain secrecy all the while proclaiming Blagojevich's guilt.

The Fitzgerald press conference created a media and legislative frenzy, but Fitzgerald has made public almost none of the evidence in his possession to support his claims to assist the public in assessing the truth behind the criminal complaint.

The affidavit supporting the criminal complaint contains excerpts of taped calls, but does not contain complete conversations, much less other conversations which might put the excerpt in context. Although you wouldn't know it from the press conference, cursing profusely is not a crime.

The Illinois legislature has made the criminal complaint affidavit one of the centerpieces of the impeachment process. The other grounds for impeachment, such as violating separation of powers, are secondary.

If the legislators were honest with the public, they would have to admit that the criminal complaint allegations are the reason for impeachment, and everything else is window dressing.

While the criminal complaint allegations are the reason the impeachment process started, Fitzgerald has made sure that Blagojevich was not able to obtain the evidence necessary to defend himself in the impeachment process against such charges.

At Fitzgerald's request, the House impeachment committee forbade Blagojevich or anyone else from inquiring into the evidence supporting the criminal complaint affidavit. Instead, the House took the affidavit to be true, and based much of the article of impeachment solely on the affidavit.

The Illinois Senate has accepted the house impeachment record, which incorporates the criminal complaint affidavit, into evidence while forbidding anyone from challenging the record. (Senate Rule 8(b))

The Senate also has forbidden anyone, including Blagojevich, from seeking any evidence which, in the sole estimation of Fitzgerald, would endanger the criminal case. (Senate Rule 15(f)).

Blagojevich cannot call witnesses, such as Rahm Emanuel and Valerie Jarrett, who are believed to be persons referenced in the criminal complaint affidavit as persons to whom Blagojevich attempted to sell the Senate seat, despite denials by Emanuel and Jarrett that any such attempt was made.

So Blagojevich cannot call material witnesses to cast doubt on the specific and overall reliability of the criminal complaint affidavit. Rule 15(f) violates fundamental fairness.

More important, Rule 15(f) gives to Fitzgerald decision making power over the Senate trial. I believe this provision violates the Illinois Constitution, Article IV, Section 14, which states that "impeachments shall be tried by the Senate."

Nothing in the Constitution vests the U.S. Attorney with the power to try a Governor, but here, the U.S. Attorney has been given the power to make decisions over the evidence permitted at the trial. The delegation of trial authority to Fitzgerald is unconstitutional, and is an irrevocable taint on the trial process.

By analogy, nothing in the various constitutional and statutory provisions empowering the judiciary to decide cases empowers the judiciary to delegate decision making authority to others.

It would be as if a judge decided that trial rulings would be made by the judge's neighbor. Only in the case of Rod Blagojevich is such outrageous conduct tolerated, because Fitzgerald successfully convicted Blagojevich in the court of public opinion without so much as an indictment, much less a trial.

Blagojevich has done himself no favors by refusing to partipate in the pre-trial and trial procedures in order to contest the Senate Rules. In so doing, Blagojevich may have waived his otherwise valid objections.

The impeachment trial that is about to begin is an injustice. Not because Rod Blagojevich is innocent of the charges, or should remain in office.

Rather, the injustice is a result of a prosecutor who saw it as his charge to use his bully pulpit to remove a Governor, and a legislature which willingly served this function for its own political purposes.

Rod Blagojevich may not deserve sympathy, but he does deserve a fair and constitutional process, neither of which will be available at the Senate trial.

“One more question about Patrick Fitzgerald. As far as weeding out the corruption in IL, is he one of the good guys?”

Actually, Patrick Fitzgerald is the same guy who as a special prosecutor appointed by Prez Bush (the fool) went after and prosecuted Scooter Libby for allegedly lying about his part in the Valerie Plame case that ended up with Scooter in jail until Bush gave him a partial pardon (commutation of sentence). I frankly don’t like Patrick Fitzgerald. He is overly ambitious and out to make a name for himself. He prosecuted Libby with little to no evidence of perjury on a crime that never took place (the alleged outing of Valerie Plame as an FBI agent supposedly by higher ups in the Bush Admin, even though Fitzgerald already knew who outed her, Richard Armitage, not Cheney or Karl Rove or Libby).

But I digress. Fitzgerald has stalled off his indictment of Gov Rod Blagojevich for 3 months, which leads me to believe he might not have the complete goods on Blago yet, or others are now singing to him with more info, or who knows why for sure. Suspicious though. But the tapes from phone tapping do exist, and Fitzgerald has them. Also, 4 of the tapes will be played at the IL State Senate impeachment trial starting today. However, the State legislature has a pattern of corruption to impeach Blago on that does not rely solely on what Fitzgerald is going after Blago for. There is plenty more.

I was just a little while ago listening to the televised on a local channel impeachment proceedings where the House Prosecutor was listing the various parts of the pattern of corruption that the House impeached Blago on, and he was reporting these charges to the IL Senate that is now holding the impeachment trial. There are many elements of corruption on Blago’s part to impeach him on, not reliant upon what Fitzgerald is up to.

Bottom line, I don’t like Fitzgerald as I think he is a grand stander and that he went after Scooter Libby on trivia that should never have been brought to trial. He really wanted Cheney or Karl Rove, but went after the low hanging fruit and that happened to be poor Scooter Libby, just so Fitz could justify all the money he was being paid as Special Prosecutor. After all that money and time spent, he didn’t want to come up empty handed. To me he is just another shade of crook. As to his case against Blago, that remains to be seen as he hasn’t gotten the indictment yet. However, Blago is a scum bum Gov in his own right who has done plenty of other bad things in this State and deserves to be impeached by our State Congress. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.