Nonsense. Evolutionary theory today is far advanced from what Darwin originally proposed. Just to mention one item, Darwin had no concept of DNA analysis showing how closely various species are related.
Bottom line remains the same: the theory of evolution is science. "Creationism" (or whatever you guys call it these days) is not. End of discussion...
The Evolutionists are always looking for the missing link and missing it.
Actually, "Creationism" is no less scientific than "evolution," when you pare them down to their most basic elements.
The fact that you call "the theory of evolution" science is a good illustration of why this is so. Evolution -- regardless of whether or not it is factually correct -- suffers from the same inherent flaw as "global warming." Neither theory can really be tested in a manner that is conducive to the scientific method -- i.e., in a controlled environment, with results that can be disseminated to others and replicated by others.
With the exception of some limited cases involving simple micro-organisms that reproduce very quickly and can be observed/documented in a laboratory environment, most of what comprises "the theory of evolution" these days will always be just a theory because it simply can't be adequately tested.
“Nonsense. Evolutionary theory today is far advanced from what Darwin originally proposed. Just to mention one item, Darwin had no concept of DNA analysis showing how closely various species are related.”
Right. He had no idea of the specific mechanisms of genetic mutation that can make evolution possible. Now we do.