Posted on 01/04/2009 5:39:47 AM PST by PurpleMountains
All across the country, archeologists, paleontologists and biologists are taking part in what is perhaps the greatest example of political correctness in history – their adherence to Darwinism and their attempts to ostracize any scientist who does not agree with them. In doing so, they are not only ignoring the vast buildup of recent scientific discoveries that seriously undermines the basics of Darwinism, but they are also participating, due to politically correctness, in a belief system that indirectly resulted in the deaths of millions of people – those slaughtered by the Stalins, the Hitlers, the Maos, the Pol Pots and others who took their cue from Darwinism’s tenets.
(Excerpt) Read more at forthegrandchildren.blogspot.com ...
You're excused, and may proceed with extraction.
I can’t possibly provide proof of your opinions which I noticed.
That’s about the most Mission Impossible task ever demanded.
Would that be the horse you rode in on?
*Rimshot!*
After a certain segment shows up with their spam graphics visuals and allegories, might as well move the threads into ‘darwin central’ (a subset of SBRoom)
if nothing else, the evos are effective at shutting down intelligent dialog and putting in place of that an echo chamber
Yep, cats are cats and dogs are dogs. When you show me a cog then I will believe. Until then it is just a sham that weak minded people believe in.
Pray for W, America and Our Troops
Hey, I have no problem believing in your atheistic religion that you call science. Why should you need proof to believe when your entire scientific church doesn’t. Sure I have as much qualification as any other sceptic. The difference between you and me is I require real tangible proof, not some gap filled theory.
I could care less if you believe, I just don’t have your level of faith.
Pray for W, America and Our Troops
Lucy is a fraud and you know it. It is a Chimp skull. You google any fossil you want and type fraud behind it and you will see the skeptics explaining the scientist hoaxes behind them. What next Nebraska man?
Pray for W, America and Our Troops
That would appear to be an experiment fraught with peril in the seeking of an honest evaluation.
How is calling someones mother a prostitute intelligent discussion?
Not as much fraud as you might find in your avg Biology textbook. How many years did they call the Peking Man true when it was a monkey skull or the other hoaxes they called fact. Sorry, I trust the internet vs corrupt scientists.
Pray for W, America and Our Troops
There is no wisdom in the theory of evolution. Maybe a few fig leaves knocked off by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil...
You trust unverifiable claims above published and peer-reviewed evaluations?
Is this because the unverifiable claims support your contentions and beliefs instead of refute them?
How much credence would you give these claims if the situation were reversed?
Of course there have been frauds. There is fraud in every endeavor in life. Just because Bernie Madoff is a trickster doesn't mean your corner banker is stealing from your kid's piggy bank.
You’ll never believe, because you don’t WANT to. There will never be enough evidence to persuade you otherwise.
“Lucy is a chimp. “
See, if you believe this, you’re disqualified from the argument.
Saying something stupid and even believing it doesn’t count in the search for truth.
Is their wisdom in the medical treatments that evolutionary research helps create?
> There is no wisdom in the theory of evolution. Maybe a few fig leaves knocked off by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil...
Not a very helpful answer. In fact, a smartass answer that does Creationists no credit. Sorry, I gotta go now: more important things to do and all. Later...
Do some study on the pygmy chimpanzee
On what basis do you claim Peking Man is a hoax?
Nowhere does the Bible date the age of this earth. Genesis 1:1 declares a statement of fact. Verse 2 continues with 'And' something happened to make this earth become without form void and flooded. Flesh man had not yet been formed.
The earth itself is filled with evidence of it being of OLD time. And Peter that one elected to build the church says there are three different heaven/earth ages. IIPeter 3
Peter also tells us how the Heavenly Father marks His time that a 'day' is as a thousand years. So there is no scripture basis to say the days of creation were 24 hour days as we calculate a day to be today. Man can approximately calculate 6 thousand years since the formation of 'the' Adam into a flesh body through the listing of 'the' Adam's genealogy. Have you noticed anyone missing in 'the' Adam's genealogy in Genesis 5?
Treat me with respect and I’ll do the same with you.
A few questions so I can respond properly:
Do you believe in a Supernatural God?
How exactly do you defend neo-Darwinian thought on the basis of logic and common sense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.