We could cover this ahead of time by asking Freepers who know Hawaiians born in 1961 and just get their birth date and document index number. If his document is out of order, that would suggest a forgery.
What if a polling agency conducts a telephone survey of registered Democrats, and asked them the following:
"Over the next few days, you will be hearing in the news that dozens of lawsuits have been filed across the country, challenging Barack Obama's citizenship status. As strange as it may sound, Barack Obama has refused to release his original paper birth certificate, to prove that he is a natural-born US citizen and Constitutionally qualified to be President.
Additionally, his Campaign lied about his citizenship status when they produced a forged document image that they falsely claimed was his original birth certificate.
Assuming that you voted for Obama, if you had known before the election, that he was not Constitutionally qualified to be President, and that he deliberately kept his birthplace a secret by refusing to show his original, paper birth certificate, would you still have voted for him?" Well, Mr. Zogby? How about it?
We could cover this ahead of time by asking Freepers who know Hawaiians born in 1961 and just get their birth date and document index number. If his document is out of order, that would suggest a forgery. I'm going to give Hawaii's Vital Records office a call, and confirm that late birth registrations are given whatever is the next available number. So, let's say they had 14,058 live births that occurred between Jan. 1, 1961 and Dec.31, 1961, and that were also registered during the year. Any late birth registrations that were received on and after Jan 1, 1962 would begin with 14,059 and increment for each additional late registration.
If I had to guess, I'd say that Obama's "birth record number," 010640, just happens to belong to someone deceased.
AND, as we all know, Dead men tell no tales."