Posted on 11/22/2008 8:32:29 AM PST by BP2
Posted: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm | Lasted edited: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm
Today, Leo Donofrio, also the Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, is separately filing an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatano.
Leo will be updating his blog with the official complaint, and I’ll update here as well…
Today, Leo C. Donofrio filed, with the NJ Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Judicial
Conduct, an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino with regard to the initial stage of this litigation which was originally filed in the NJ Superior Court, Appellate Division. The case, having come directly from an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court is now before the the United States Supreme Court, “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008″ before all nine Supreme Court Justices.
I am very concerned that if the United States Supreme Court requests the official records of the case from the NJ Appellate Division, a fraudulent case file - not including all relevant documents - will be forwarded to the SCOTUS and thereby the case now pending might be jeopardized.A copy of the official complaint - by way of a New Jersey Supreme Court generated form - will be uploaded to this blog shortly.
| Posted: Nov.21.2008 @ 6:53 pm | Lasted edited: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm |
|
|
| JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGED BY LEO DONOFRIO IN NJ SUPERIOR COURT APPELLATE DIVISION - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ALLEGED AGAINST JUDGE JACK M. SABATINO IN ACTION CHALLENGING ELIGIBILITY OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR 2008 ELECTION. [MEDIA UPDATE:] Today, Leo Donofrio learned that New Jersey Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino has failed to correct the public record of the initial lower court case. Leo Donofrio feels it is imperative that he bring this battle public. Therefore, he will appear on the Plains Radio Network with Ed Hale tonight at 9:00 PM EST. Leo Donofrio will also appear on Overnight AM with Lan Lamphere at 11:00 PM EST as well.
Today, Leo C. Donofrio filed, with the NJ Supreme Court's Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino with regard to the initial stage of this litigation which was originally filed in the NJ Superior Court, Appellate Division. The case, having come directly from an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court is now before the the United States Supreme Court, "DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008" before all nine Supreme Court Justices. I am very concerned that if the United States Supreme Court requests the official records of the case from the NJ Appellate Division, a fraudulent case file - not including all relevant documents - will be forwarded to the SCOTUS and thereby the case now pending might be jeopardized.
A copy of the official complaint - by way of a New Jersey Supreme Court generated form - will be uploaded to this blog shortly. |
You are correct - my apologies.
Web sites are irrelevant. The courts will have far more to say than any Govt web site.
Good work. 6-3 with Breyer voting for the voters. Who were the 3 dissenting?
Unfortunately, O’Connor, Scalia, and Thomas ...
But, Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter, AND Stevens did ...
Who woulda thunk it - but like I said, I have NOT yet read the entire ruling in the case ...
In these new cases, I think Alito, Roberts, Scalia and Thomas would vote for eligibility verification - and then you only need one from the “Gang of Four”, or Kennedy ...
ping
http://www.lynettelong.com/caucusfraud/
Also, if BO is disqualified before the electors vote then DNC gets to pick a replacement; if after they vote (assuming they vote for him) then it becomes congress’ problem.
But only for votes are needed of the nine Justices on December 5th for the Donofrio case to be fully heard before the Court. I trust Justice Roberts, Thomas, Scalia, and Alito to make that happen. That is my prayer.
Weird. I guess Rehnquist (sp?) voted with the majority??? Strange. He was a good man. Yeah it might come down to Kennedy.
To me - it appears that a fraud and violation of the Constitution has been committed or is about to occur. The Justices need to insure that this person is eligble. Roberts has to swear him in and there supposedly criminal laws that he cannot swear him in unless certain things are met.
Based on Leo’s suit and what we have heard so far - O does not appear to be eligble or at least he is hiding something beyond some embarrassing revelation.
My concern is if Leo wins it goes back to NJ and O could give the SOS some bogus BC and they would say he passes go.
Someone mentioned Soros contributed a lot to get Sec of States elected in many states.
Talk Radio will not weigh in.
They stand to gain massive revenue through book sales, ratings, ad dollars and Web hits. Not to mention appearences on ObamaTV.
Case in point: Kathleen Parker. She now is a “respected conservative columnist” and will be invited to the finest parties.
Coulter, Limbaugh, Beck and Savage will reap the benefits of our misery.
Sad but probably true. Their shows are businesses and they are afraid of the Fairness Doctrine. Ed Meese is working with a group to try to protect talk radio. If they chicken out then what good are they? The Internet Radio people are the real deal and they have courage.
I think Hannity may be the only one who really cares. Beck and Savage already had run ins with Islamists to try to muzzle them.
Excellent post. I’ll need to check more into FEC v. Akins June 1, 1998
Oppps, I didn't post anything about that Kenyan call. You're telling 'ckilmer', right? In fact who knows if someone was impersonating the Kenyan ambassador?
They'll get all but Bryer, and possibly Ginsburg. Bryer has said that he believes that immigrants should be allowed to be President. Ginsburg has cited court opinions from other countries as basis for her opinions.
A Procedural Guide to the Electoral College
Prepared by The Office of the Federal Register
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/procedural_guide.html
.
.
###
Natural Born Citizen Clause/Presidential Eligibility Clause
Article II Section 1
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
.
.
~~~
Amendment XII
Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804.
Note: A portion of Article II, section 1 of the Constitution was superseded by the 12th amendment.
The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves;
they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President,
and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate ;
— the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;
— the person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority,
then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President.
But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.
[And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. —]*
the person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President;
a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice.
But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.
*Superseded by section 3 of the 20th amendment.
http://www.consource.org/index.asp?bid=582&fid=600&documentid=13525
.
.
###
Key Electoral College Dates and Events
* November 4, 2008 - General Election: The voters in each State choose electors to serve in the Electoral College.
As soon as election results are final, the States prepare seven or nine original “Certificates of Ascertainment” of the electors chosen, and send one original along with two certified copies (or three originals, if nine were prepared) to the Archivist of the United States.
* December 15, 2008 - Meeting of Electors: The electors in each State meet to select the President and Vice President of the United States. The electors record their votes on six “Certificates of Vote,” which are paired with the six remaining original “Certificates of Ascertainment.”
The electors sign, seal and certify the packages of electoral votes and immediately send them to the President of the Senate, the Archivist of the United States and other designated Federal and State officials.
* December 24, 2008 - Deadline for Receipt of Electoral Votes: The President of the Senate, the Archivist of the United States, and other designated Federal and State officials must have the electoral votes in hand.
* January 8, 2009 - Counting Electoral Votes in Congress: Public Law 110-430 changed the date of the electoral vote in Congress in 2009 from January 6 to January 8. This date change is effective only for the 2008 presidential election.
The Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes (unless Congress passes a law to change the date).
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/faq.html
.
.
###
Check the comments on this page at the Forbes mag blog site:
http://blogs.forbes.com/trailwatch/2008/11/obamas-birth—1.html
Right ...not you.
Thanks so much for the link, now I’ve bookmarked it, and a BTTT !!!
cowards? Savage is anything but... the man has balls of steel.
as for Rush, he’s the master strategist and i am surprised he hasn’t mentioned this issue.
Laura Ingraham clerked for Justice Thomas.
BTW, could this Judge Sabato be related to Larry Sabato, the pro-Dem prof at the University of Virgina who always pops up with punditry before elections?
“Excellent post. I’ll need to check more into FEC v. Akins June 1, 1998”
Thx - although not specifically germaine to these new cases, the majority opinion DID extend Article III standing to voters ...
“Excellent post. I’ll need to check more into FEC v. Akins June 1, 1998”
Thx - although not specifically germaine to these new cases, the majority opinion DID extend Article III standing to voters ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.