Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

Here’s the bottom line folks:

If, on December 1st, Comrade 0bama has NOT produced to the United States Supreme Court a satisfactory response (which by all rules of logic would mean a valid, legitimate and verifiable birth certificate establishing his Constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States), the SCOTUS must rule that he is INeligible to serve, they must rule that the results of the November 4th election are invalid, and that new elections must be held. As I see it, the only way to proceed after such a ruling would be for the current President to resign on January 19th, 2009 and for the Vice President to be sworn in as Interim President for the duration of this crisis.

And make no mistake, it would be a crisis of unheard of proportions, never before seen in America.

If 0bama is unable to produce evidence that he is in fact eligible to serve as President, and if the SCOTUS fails to rule as outlined above, it means that we can kiss our Constitution and Republic goodbye, because the Rule of Law no longer applies.

It would mean that we are no longer citizens, but serfs.


13 posted on 11/17/2008 3:14:52 PM PST by mkjessup (Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina is RIGHT. McCain screwed us all. Welcome Comrade 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup
So, why has no one obtained copies of birth Certificates of others who were born in Hawaii on the same day and at all the hospitals. Then it would be possible to make document comparisons, stampings, etc.; Also, how registration numbers worked would be relative.
This might also be appropriate for his Selective Service mailing that has items of question on it such as post mark and numbering.

Come on where are the true detectives on this.

17 posted on 11/17/2008 3:21:05 PM PST by tbird-james
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

Why does this story remind me of the last scene in Caddyshack where Danny’s ball comes to a stop on the edge of the cup, and Lou the caddy master sits there and watches it finally go in.


21 posted on 11/17/2008 3:28:56 PM PST by petercooper (1/20/13 - Change I can believe in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

It seems to me, although I am certainly no constitutional scholar, that if 0bama is found to be ineligible before the Electoral College votes, then they would have to vote for someone else. If he is found ineligible after they have elected him, then it would go to Biden, just as I think it would if 0bama died before taking the oath.

I don’t see any scenario that would force a new election.


32 posted on 11/17/2008 3:50:08 PM PST by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

Excellent summary, imho.

Thanks.


80 posted on 11/17/2008 7:03:58 PM PST by Quix (LAWLESS LEADER QUOTES FM 1900: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

No new elections—if 0 is found ineligible McCain would likely take office, with Biden as VP. The Electors decide this.


91 posted on 11/17/2008 7:46:26 PM PST by luvadavi (Important old novel: The Moon Is Down, John Steinbeck, 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

Yup.

It’s sad to say that the Supreme Court is our last hope for upholding the constitution in this free republic.

Their track record so far has been exceedingly questionable.

Like the Captain said in “Hunt for Red October”, I personally put our chances at 1 in 3.


95 posted on 11/17/2008 8:26:44 PM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup; LucyT; ExTexasRedhead

New elections? Unfortunately, no provision for that in the Constitution. The sad fact is that the Framers and amenders of the Constitution weren’t prescient enough to make any provision for a scienario where some candidate could pull such a hoax on the nation, and fail to disclose that he wasn’t constitutionally eligible to be POTUS.


107 posted on 11/17/2008 10:35:04 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
"If, on December 1st, Comrade 0bama has NOT produced to the United States Supreme Court a satisfactory response (which by all rules of logic would mean a valid, legitimate and verifiable birth certificate establishing his Constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States), the SCOTUS must rule that he is INeligible to serve"

That is not quite accurate. - A "Response" is an assertion of opinion, and request for a particular disposition.

137 posted on 11/18/2008 7:26:06 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

“..it would be a crisis of unheard of proportions, never before seen in America.”

We are already in a crisis more serious than ever experienced in the history of this nation. One more is acceptable if it can solve the question of Obama’s citizenship. Go ahead, let there be riots if they are necessary to preserve our Constitution. Besides, riots will forever identify America haters.


155 posted on 11/20/2008 4:34:08 PM PST by 353FMG (The sky is not falling, yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup
It would mean that we are no longer citizens, but serfs.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

And then, Serfs UP!

158 posted on 11/23/2008 10:59:20 AM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson