To: mkjessup; LucyT; ExTexasRedhead
New elections? Unfortunately, no provision for that in the Constitution. The sad fact is that the Framers and amenders of the Constitution weren’t prescient enough to make any provision for a scienario where some candidate could pull such a hoax on the nation, and fail to disclose that he wasn’t constitutionally eligible to be POTUS.
To: justiceseeker93
New elections? Unfortunately, no provision for that in the Constitution.
The lack of a Constitutional precedent has never stopped the SCOTUS in the past regarding other issues, lol
The sad fact is that the Framers and amenders of the Constitution werent prescient enough to make any provision for a scenario where some candidate could pull such a hoax on the nation, and fail to disclose that he wasnt constitutionally eligible to be POTUS.
It was assumed back then that basic honesty would prevail in such weighty matters. Of course there was no such thing as the Democrat Party when the Constitution was written, or they would have included enough safeguards and countermeasures that it would have forced today's 'Rats to leave the U.S. and sail off to Cuba or some other Communist paradise.
Instead, they managed to con everyone into voting FOR an American Communist 'paradise' this past November 4th.
God help us all.
114 posted on
11/18/2008 4:04:28 AM PST by
mkjessup
(Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina is RIGHT. McCain screwed us all. Welcome Comrade 0bama.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson