Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: justiceseeker93
New elections? Unfortunately, no provision for that in the Constitution.

The lack of a Constitutional precedent has never stopped the SCOTUS in the past regarding other issues, lol

The sad fact is that the Framers and amenders of the Constitution weren’t prescient enough to make any provision for a scenario where some candidate could pull such a hoax on the nation, and fail to disclose that he wasn’t constitutionally eligible to be POTUS.

It was assumed back then that basic honesty would prevail in such weighty matters. Of course there was no such thing as the Democrat Party when the Constitution was written, or they would have included enough safeguards and countermeasures that it would have forced today's 'Rats to leave the U.S. and sail off to Cuba or some other Communist paradise.

Instead, they managed to con everyone into voting FOR an American Communist 'paradise' this past November 4th.

God help us all.
114 posted on 11/18/2008 4:04:28 AM PST by mkjessup (Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina is RIGHT. McCain screwed us all. Welcome Comrade 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup; ExTexasRedhead; LucyT
It was presumed back then that basic honesty would prevail in such weighty matters.

Exactly. Contrary to leftist BS, basic honesty is absolutely necessary for a free market economy and and a free society in general.

124 posted on 11/18/2008 1:15:26 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson