Posted on 11/07/2008 6:47:37 PM PST by mnehring
This is interesting. Souter tells Obama to produce the vault copy by December 1, 2008. I believe the messiah will defy the Justices.
Who will force the issue? Who wants to open up that pandora's box? Imagine if there is something on that birth certificate that disqualifies Obama from the office of the President. What are you going to do? Start a civil war? There will be blood in the streets you try to enforce the rule of law. This should have happened before the election. Obambi knows it too.
Here is the fraud report first reported at Atlas.
The Supreme Court and Obama's Birth Certificate organicpeas
If The Supreme Court Decides…?
At this point, Supreme Court Justice David Souter's Clerk informed Philip J. Berg, the lawyer who brought the case against Obama, that his petition for an injunction to stay the November 4th election was denied, but the Clerk also required the defendants to respond to the Writ of Certiorari (which requires the concurrence of four Justices) by December 1. At that time, Mr. Obama must present to the Court an authentic birth certificate, after which Mr. Berg will respond.
If Obama fails to do that, it is sure to inspire the skepticism of the Justices, who are unaccustomed to being defied. They will have to decide what to do about a president-elect who refuses to prove his natural-born citizenship.
"I can see a unanimous Court (en banc) decertifying the election if Obama refuses to produce his birth certificate," says Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer. "They cannot do otherwise without abandoning all credibility as guardians of the Constitution. Even the most liberal justices, however loathe they may to do this, still consider themselves guardians of the Constitution. The Court is very jealous of its power - even over presidents, even over presidents-elect."
Also remember that on December 13, the Electoral College meets to casts its votes. If it has been determined that Mr. Obama is an illegal alien and therefore ineligible to become President of the United States, the Electors will be duty-bound to honor the Constitution.
It takes 4 judges to grant Writ of Certiorari ...
BTW ... what happened to FR yesterday - could not get in ALL day ... a DOS attack?
J R said it was a “Murphy Law” thing. Two problems happened at once.
FR Mail to you
There are other ways of arrival that Writ of Certiorari?
Nope - minimum 4 SCOTUS to grant Cert ... otherwise, they would be flooded with cases.
I’m full of HOPE, I guess on this.
I don’t know if they publish the vote on Cert - but there ARE 4 SCOTUS conservatives - I am somewhat hopeful that they will grant Cert.
HOPE has become a four-letter word.
So far I don’t think the SCOTUS has requested nor has indicated Obama needs to show proof. I think the respond thing is for his attorneys to respond with anthing they wish such as motions, etc.
After Obama is elected via the EC then that is one thing but prior if Obama should drop out I’m not sure. I know that the DNC has authority to replace him as the Democratic Party nonimee up to some point. That point is which I don’t know where is located along the process time table.
I just flat out don't believe that. I see the most likely result of the Petition for Cert as being outright failure to get votes to hear the case period. No further remedy. Certainly not from David Souter. There is just nothing in the procedure for any remedy remotely like this.
Thanks STARWISE.
BTW ... what happened to FR yesterday - could not get in ALL day ... a DOS attack?
Try the following link for JR’s response.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2128703/posts?page=207#207
I spent the better part of an hour with a friend that has been in DC quite a bit lately, (he has some pressing issues with congress that I will not go into) his attorney said this Obama citizenship issue is the talk of DC. They know there is no proof that O can come up with to prove he is legit and they are all trying to figure out how to handle this.
He is the one that gave me the link that you read. We all know how this should have been handled but at the same time I guess he had to be elected for the courts to respond? Seems backwards, especially in this toxic atmosphere.
Needless to say Larry (my friend) is so concerned he already stocked up on munitions for his weapons. He told me to do the same and Larry is not one to be swayed easily.
I fear for this country and what we are about to witness. God Bless America and be prepared.
Oh no, not him at all. This Larry is local (Buffalo).
I’m going to safely assume that he is not referring to Larry Sinclair.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2128383/posts?page=512#512
512
:) I thought so. But it can get confused easily ;)
No, see 513
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.