I wrote my comment on Nov 2nd 2008.
I believe I wrote that because I was ticked that it should have been written months before 10/31/2008 to give all of us more time to spread the article far and wide.
I think there was an election or something going on 2 days later....;)
(read post 36 too for clarification)
I now understand that, I did not when I replied to your ancient post. I did not notice the date of your reply.
Bump for historians...