Posted on 08/22/2008 7:51:31 PM PDT by Polarik
It took the Obama camp over 2 months two come up with this new COLB. Why so long? In that time, I could’ve come up with a more credible forgery. If the Obama camp had this same COLB in the beginning then they would have taken new images of it within hours when all the controversy started and published it online.
Thank you, Polarik. There should be enough ammo here to continue the battle. This information should be filed in an amicus brief on the Berg case.
Are there any freeper lawyers live in Philadelphia? 2 hours of your time and you get to make history.
Signed and sealed by the City of Boston.
They don't look anything like that bogus document the Obama Campaign is pushing.
Appreciate your efforts here....bL
That being said, I'm going to contact a laywer friend of mine who handles corporate law and ask him if there's the making of a civil suit here.
It's a really gray area, and I have not found any precidents where a Plaintiff is suing a Defendant for for posting a doctored image. Like, how are we damaged by it, and what would it take to make us whole?
BTW, odds are good that all official documents issued in City of Boston look different than anywhere else on Earth.
Truly amazing. Makes me think California is as backwards a place as it’s always seemed to be. Like those Chinese restaurants where all the food is on the turntable and you just come and sit down and start eating. Talk about sanitary!
I’m sorry. The style of the article reminded me of the series “You suck at Photoshop” on YouTube in that FactCheck was spelled incorrectly every time. Either that or I just really needed sleep. lol
The guy who does the photoshop vids does that. One is “you suck at photoshack” another is “you such at photoshock” and so on. I find them quite funny.
Thank you for all the info Ron..... Keep up the fantastic work.
great work bump!
Big Bump. The “fact check” clowns are Obama’s tools.
A handful of people on a handful of blogs didn't make it a controversy for the Obama campaign. No need to draw attention to something that no one else to speak of knew anything about.
The only reason they did this now is because of Corsi's having made mention of it in an interview on Fox News, which made it mainstream. If it hadn't been for that, it would have continued to not be any sort of controversy for the Obama campaign.
And just for the record, the document in the scan is the very same document shown in the photos. Right down to the creases in the top fold.
k
Koyaan and a bunch of his libelous lowlifes have gone on a "Polarik love fest" with such delightful accolades like:
Polarik claimed to have reproduced the entire document, but Ray and I independently found Polarik’s claim to be utter bullsh*t.
Ray showed his work and I showed mine. They showed Polarik to be a LIAR.
Here’s my work, after Ray’s, showing the false Polarik date different from the other text.
I see Polarik as utter bullsh*t. He is a liar. Polarik claimed to have faked the whole document. He only faked hour of birth, and it was easily detectable.Polarik is a liar.
Never mind what I said about it in my blog, and on FR -- that the only thing I did not recreate from the Kos image was the TIME OF BIRTH. I changed it so that folks could tell the clone from the Kos. So, the fact that they are calling me a liar, means that I must have done a stellar job in creating my clone!!
Koyaan and his cohorts bitched about FR not printing their comments.The stuff they said about me on Koyaan's blog would never see the light of day on a respected pub like Free Republic.
Like,uh...Which part of No personal attacks did they NOT understand?
But, personal attacks are their stock in trade. For instance, here's some hugs and kisses from someone named Elliewyatt:
I may need to offer some more apologies- Did I forget to say that Polarik is full of horse sh*t? If so, please forgive me. Polarik is full of horse sh*t.
She really has a way with words, doesn't she?
And Polarik has a new home. At Free Republic. And his “research” is just as shoddy…..
Just how long have I called this place, home? ;-)
More of Ellies Christmas cheer:
He’s now using blowups of the photos from FactCheck superimposed over the Kos COLB. Gods what an idiot.
I guess that she's dyslexic as well as derisive. "Gods what an idiot?" Must be a pagan talking here.
FYI, I started a new thread on FR to counter Polarik’s claims. They soon pulled the plug on it.
Which part of No personal attacks did he NOT understand?
Koyaan continues
What I see (in addition to the fraudulent Kos/PD overlay) is that he has an overlay of a 2007 COLB which has the EXACT SAME borders as the Kos COLB.
What exactly is fraudulent about my overlays? Which part of the Kos COLB borders actually "match" the new 2007 COLB borders?
Patgund takes a parting shot at FR:
Not surprising. Free Republic squashes dissent and “wrong thinking” as well as most PUMA sites do. For that matter, Free Republic is more than likely where they learned to do that.
Gee. Do we really "squash" dissent here? Nah....
Koyaan chimes in:
By the way, FR isn’t allowing any replies to Polarik’s post that disagree with him.
Which part of No personal attacks did he NOT understand?
Well, that's about enough for one day. This just goes to show that the more my research is VALID, the more RABID is the dissenting rabble.
Looks like you have some ignorant Obama kneepadders for enemies. A badge of honor, franky.
Get some restful sleep my friend, then look back at all those (sic) notations that follow my intentional typos.
They are what I call, "Variations on a theme."
Until I do, I need to scratch my comments on the absence of the SIGNATURE BLOCK.
I will. ;-) I’ve slept 10 hours this week after several marathon design sessions.
ugh
What's fraudulent about the Kos/PD overlay is that it does not reflect the reality. In order to get the borders and text of the Kos and PD images to perfectly overlay each other as you have shown, the aspect ratio of one or the other image needs to be altered, i.e. the height and width need to be changed by a disproportionate amount (squeezed or stretched) in order to "force" the two to overlay perfectly.
The reality is that when one or the other image is simply scaled, i.e. maintaining the aspect ratio and not resorting to any squeezing or stretching, and the widths of the borders are matched at the tops of each border, the border of the PD image is taller than the border of the Kos image, and the horizontal alignment of the text gets progressively worse as you go down below "CHILD'S NAME."
That's the reality. The only way reproduce what Polarik misrepresents as the reality is to either squeeze the PD image or stretch the Kos image vertically to force them to perfectly overlay.
Also, the laundry list of differences between the scanned image and the FactCheck photos are is full of factual errors. I'll address some of those in subsequent posts if this post is allowed.
k
Why would you comment on the absence of a signature block when just yesterday you said this over on TexasDarlin :
Remember the signature stamp that was barely visible, even under heavy image enhancement? Remember how this amorphous blob was located way off to the left side of the COLB?
First, the "amorphous blob" wasn't "located way off to the left side of the COLB." It was located in the middle, just as is shown in the photos. It was located way off to the left side in the PD COLB. But again, it was located in the middle in the Kos COLB.
Second, you also said this:
Well, now it’s clear as day, right smack dab in the middle with the date stamp riding directly above it. Not only are date stamps never placed right above the signature block on any existing COLBs was on the forged COLB.
I want those reading this to pay particular attention here. Polarik is saying that date stamps are never placed right above the signature block on any existing COLBs.
Now take a look at this:
This is a scan of the back side of the "Michele COLB" which was issued in June 2008. And as you can see, the date stamp is clearly placed above the signature stamp.
What's the significance of this? It's that Polarik had previously posted this image on his blog. And in fact it's still there in his PhotoBucket album:
So I ask those of you reading this. Why would Polarik claim that the date stamps are never placed right above the signature block on any existing COLB when he knows that this is not true?
k
So wait until it becomes an issue in the main stream press. Huh? No need to end a controversy before it starts. That's Back@ss thinking. It's just toooooooo much extra work for an Obama lackey to fix a shoddy jpg image of Obama's COLB that could re-imaged in 15 minutes. So no pride in doing a good job - huh?
Welcome to FR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
