Koyaan and a bunch of his libelous lowlifes have gone on a "Polarik love fest" with such delightful accolades like:
Polarik claimed to have reproduced the entire document, but Ray and I independently found Polarik’s claim to be utter bullsh*t.
Ray showed his work and I showed mine. They showed Polarik to be a LIAR.
Here’s my work, after Ray’s, showing the false Polarik date different from the other text.
I see Polarik as utter bullsh*t. He is a liar. Polarik claimed to have faked the whole document. He only faked hour of birth, and it was easily detectable.Polarik is a liar.
Never mind what I said about it in my blog, and on FR -- that the only thing I did not recreate from the Kos image was the TIME OF BIRTH. I changed it so that folks could tell the clone from the Kos. So, the fact that they are calling me a liar, means that I must have done a stellar job in creating my clone!!
Koyaan and his cohorts bitched about FR not printing their comments.The stuff they said about me on Koyaan's blog would never see the light of day on a respected pub like Free Republic.
Like,uh...Which part of No personal attacks did they NOT understand?
But, personal attacks are their stock in trade. For instance, here's some hugs and kisses from someone named Elliewyatt:
I may need to offer some more apologies- Did I forget to say that Polarik is full of horse sh*t? If so, please forgive me. Polarik is full of horse sh*t.
She really has a way with words, doesn't she?
And Polarik has a new home. At Free Republic. And his “research” is just as shoddy…..
Just how long have I called this place, home? ;-)
More of Ellies Christmas cheer:
He’s now using blowups of the photos from FactCheck superimposed over the Kos COLB. Gods what an idiot.
I guess that she's dyslexic as well as derisive. "Gods what an idiot?" Must be a pagan talking here.
FYI, I started a new thread on FR to counter Polarik’s claims. They soon pulled the plug on it.
Which part of No personal attacks did he NOT understand?
Koyaan continues
What I see (in addition to the fraudulent Kos/PD overlay) is that he has an overlay of a 2007 COLB which has the EXACT SAME borders as the Kos COLB.
What exactly is fraudulent about my overlays? Which part of the Kos COLB borders actually "match" the new 2007 COLB borders?
Patgund takes a parting shot at FR:
Not surprising. Free Republic squashes dissent and “wrong thinking” as well as most PUMA sites do. For that matter, Free Republic is more than likely where they learned to do that.
Gee. Do we really "squash" dissent here? Nah....
Koyaan chimes in:
By the way, FR isn’t allowing any replies to Polarik’s post that disagree with him.
Which part of No personal attacks did he NOT understand?
Well, that's about enough for one day. This just goes to show that the more my research is VALID, the more RABID is the dissenting rabble.
Looks like you have some ignorant Obama kneepadders for enemies. A badge of honor, franky.
I will. ;-) I’ve slept 10 hours this week after several marathon design sessions.
ugh
What's fraudulent about the Kos/PD overlay is that it does not reflect the reality. In order to get the borders and text of the Kos and PD images to perfectly overlay each other as you have shown, the aspect ratio of one or the other image needs to be altered, i.e. the height and width need to be changed by a disproportionate amount (squeezed or stretched) in order to "force" the two to overlay perfectly.
The reality is that when one or the other image is simply scaled, i.e. maintaining the aspect ratio and not resorting to any squeezing or stretching, and the widths of the borders are matched at the tops of each border, the border of the PD image is taller than the border of the Kos image, and the horizontal alignment of the text gets progressively worse as you go down below "CHILD'S NAME."
That's the reality. The only way reproduce what Polarik misrepresents as the reality is to either squeeze the PD image or stretch the Kos image vertically to force them to perfectly overlay.
Also, the laundry list of differences between the scanned image and the FactCheck photos are is full of factual errors. I'll address some of those in subsequent posts if this post is allowed.
k
