Until I do, I need to scratch my comments on the absence of the SIGNATURE BLOCK.
Why would you comment on the absence of a signature block when just yesterday you said this over on TexasDarlin :
Remember the signature stamp that was barely visible, even under heavy image enhancement? Remember how this amorphous blob was located way off to the left side of the COLB?
First, the "amorphous blob" wasn't "located way off to the left side of the COLB." It was located in the middle, just as is shown in the photos. It was located way off to the left side in the PD COLB. But again, it was located in the middle in the Kos COLB.
Second, you also said this:
Well, now it’s clear as day, right smack dab in the middle with the date stamp riding directly above it. Not only are date stamps never placed right above the signature block on any existing COLBs was on the forged COLB.
I want those reading this to pay particular attention here. Polarik is saying that date stamps are never placed right above the signature block on any existing COLBs.
Now take a look at this:
This is a scan of the back side of the "Michele COLB" which was issued in June 2008. And as you can see, the date stamp is clearly placed above the signature stamp.
What's the significance of this? It's that Polarik had previously posted this image on his blog. And in fact it's still there in his PhotoBucket album:
So I ask those of you reading this. Why would Polarik claim that the date stamps are never placed right above the signature block on any existing COLB when he knows that this is not true?
k
