Let’s criticize Intelligent Design’s research. Do you know of any?
Actually, I don't, but that is for the same reason that I wouldn't be able to present a sound critique of Shakespeare's collected works - I haven't read or seen much by the Bard, so most of what he produced is unknown by experience to me. Likewise, I actually don't follow the IDers much to be able to know what, if anything, they are researching. Perhaps you should investigate the matter for yourself?
And again, I note that an important function of science if falsification - presenting arguments and evidence which shoot down false theories, which is just as important as proposing new ones. Why does it seem like evolutionists are deathly afraid of falsification?
Imagine if Caesar Augustus had been that afraid when he invaded Gaul, he'd have never gotten anything accomplished!
The party line is: Evolution is true. How do we know it's true? Well, Intelligent Design doesn't have any scientific research!
Bit of a strange argument. One of the points that ID'ers put forward is that there are criticisms that can be put forth against Evolution, and part of good science is the criticism of science wherever a possible weakness has been identified. But the Evos take it personally when Evolution is criticized and seem to respond: "Well your theory sucks more!"
That's not science.