Actually, I don't, but that is for the same reason that I wouldn't be able to present a sound critique of Shakespeare's collected works - I haven't read or seen much by the Bard, so most of what he produced is unknown by experience to me. Likewise, I actually don't follow the IDers much to be able to know what, if anything, they are researching. Perhaps you should investigate the matter for yourself?
And again, I note that an important function of science if falsification - presenting arguments and evidence which shoot down false theories, which is just as important as proposing new ones. Why does it seem like evolutionists are deathly afraid of falsification?
Imagine if Caesar Augustus had been that afraid when he invaded Gaul, he'd have never gotten anything accomplished!
You are absolutely correct that falsification is important to science. All you have to do to falsify evolution is have a father or a mother produce a clone of themselves through sexual procreation. The fact that they don't produce a clone of themselves does falsify ID and Creation theories, like doesn't begat like (not exactly).
I'm sure you remember that it was Julius Caesar, not Caesar Augustus, who invaded Gaul.