Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Drillers Have 99.999% Safety Record
say anything blog ^ | 12 July 2008 | John Lott

Posted on 07/12/2008 7:33:31 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

John Lott points to an interesting statistic in a WSJ story:

Since 1975, drilling in the Exclusive Economic Zone (within 200 miles of the U.S. coast) has had a 99.999% safety record, according to the Energy Information Administration, which reports that “only .001 percent of the oil produced has been spilled.”

Thanks to technological advances, large spills are rare. Most spills are tiny, only a few feet in diameter.

So you can see why Congress and the environmentalist wackos would have their undies in a bunch about drilling for any more with that kind of track record!

The number one source of oil polluting the oceans? Dry land runoff.

Runoff from cities, roads, industrial sites and garages deposits 363 million gallons into the sea, making runoff by far the single largest source of oil pollution in the oceans. “Every year oily road runoff from a city of 5 million could contain as much oil as one large tanker spill,” notes the Smithsonian exhibit, “Ocean Planet.”

Number two source of pollution? Routine maintenance on cargo and cruise ships.

Moral of this story? Drill Here. Drill Now.

Cross Posted at Proof Positive

H/T Proof


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: drilling; energy; environment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 07/12/2008 7:33:38 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Very good indeed. Says a lot about our technological capabilities. With a safety rating like this we should have no trouble going nuclear.


2 posted on 07/12/2008 7:38:29 PM PDT by LiberConservative ("Typical" white guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
So you can see why Congress and the environmentalist wackos would have their undies in a bunch about drilling for any more with that kind of track record!

They aren't environmentalist wackos and opposing drilling has nothing to do with saving the environment. They are socialists merely using the environment as one of many methods to replace our Representative Democracy with socialism with the hope of rendering the Constitution irrelevant.
3 posted on 07/12/2008 7:41:33 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiberConservative

The envirowhackos are the same as the anti-gun Nazis always hand wringing about something that almost never happens. In an email exchange with an envirowhacko, she said that dozens of oil drilling platforms had been damaged during Katrina but was completely silent when I pointed out that NONE of the oil reached the beaches and that mother nature took care of it.


4 posted on 07/12/2008 7:41:50 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I lived in Santa Barbara, oil would just bubble up out of cracks in the ocean floor. I would bet that natural releases of oil exceed that from oil spills, if you take into account all the oceans, not just local areas where man made influences may dominate.


5 posted on 07/12/2008 7:49:18 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP

I have seen that in Texas, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait on land.


6 posted on 07/12/2008 7:51:54 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

awesom


7 posted on 07/12/2008 8:04:48 PM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
I have seen that in Texas, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait on land.

I believe the first producing oil well in the US was located by a "seep" or "oil spring" in Titusville Pennsylvania, 27 Aug 1859.

Regards,
GtG

8 posted on 07/12/2008 8:21:09 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

Good info.


9 posted on 07/12/2008 8:23:19 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I read somewhere back in the seventies that the source of the vast majority of the oil in our oceans was from emptied oil tankers pressure-washing their holds with seawater when out-of-sight in international waters.

Could that practice have stopped? Perhaps an improved, cleaner method has been devised?


10 posted on 07/12/2008 8:24:09 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

I could not answer that. But, it’s a good question.


11 posted on 07/12/2008 8:25:13 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Along with that safety record has come vastly improved techniques for dealing with oil spills.


12 posted on 07/12/2008 8:29:36 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP

Recent articles about the infamous, earth-shaking, paradigm-changing 1969 Santa Barbara Well No. 21, Platform A spill point out that small oil slicks and patches are still found in the area and blamed on the remnants of the long-ago disaster but are in fact natural seeps from the ocean floor.


13 posted on 07/12/2008 8:30:45 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I think part of the problem is that people have long memories, and forget that technology marches on. Most of us old guys can remember when drilling offshore meant a good chance of tar on the beach. It happened way too often. Same thing with nuclear power. At the height of the debate about the safety of nuclear power, with all the assurances that the odds of a nuclear accident were one in a billion, there came Three Mile Island. Then a few years later the Russians gave us Chernobyl. In both cases the technology just wasn’t very good. It takes time to restore trust. A little desperation helps as well. On the positive side, a lot of the old timers have moved to the other side of the grass, so there’s not quite the same national anxiety about these difficulties as twenty years ago. Maybe we’re ready to try again.


14 posted on 07/12/2008 8:32:01 PM PDT by vanishing liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Keep on congress!!
I have been harassing them daily
We need to be more energy dependent
Cannot depend on the instability of the mideast and Imanutjob
Yes we can drill our way out of this

DRILL HERE - DRILL NOW!!


15 posted on 07/12/2008 8:48:07 PM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I’d certainly let them drill in my back yard


16 posted on 07/12/2008 8:56:58 PM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

More oil seeps off the ocean floor than ever is spilled around the world.
If you like $5/gal, Thank Congress in Nov.

Pray for W and Our Troops


17 posted on 07/12/2008 9:13:44 PM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I agree with what you said and urge FReepers to check out Newt Gingrich’s American Solutions site (”Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less.”) I think most Americans are lagging behind scientific and technological reality. We can drill for oil in environmentally safe ways, as you said in your post. But many Americans think of the Exxon Valdez which was an accident that had nothing to do with drilling. Likewise, when they think of nuclear energy they think of the old Jack Lemon movie “China Syndrome.” Or the old “Three Mile Island” accident in Pennsylvania. What isn’t presented enough is that France gets 75% of its domestic energy from nuclear power; that there are environmentally friendly ways of drilling, removing nuclear waste, and processing low carbon “clean coal.” Yes, it’s important to develope alternative energy sources (wind, solar, etc.) but these have serious developmental flaws at present and cannot be near-term solutions. What we need is a TOTAL package that includes researh into all potential energy sources.


18 posted on 07/12/2008 11:12:32 PM PDT by T.L.Sink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Opposition to drilling is about breaking your back economically not the environment. Look at the liberal Democrat policy platform across the board and ask yourself what the ultimate aim is.


19 posted on 07/12/2008 11:44:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin '36 Olympics for murdering regimes Beijing '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

your back = our back


20 posted on 07/12/2008 11:44:54 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin '36 Olympics for murdering regimes Beijing '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson