1. A regular Certification of Birth says “Date Accepted By State Registrar” vs. Obama’s “Date Filed By Registrar”;
2. There is a black field where the certificate number should be.
"The Answer to the discrepancies noted in 1 and 2 above are the same. You get a birth cerficate number when the proposed certificate is accepted by the State Registrar!"
"There is no certificate number because, while a proposed certificate was submitted (Date Filed by Registrar), it was never accepted (Date Accepted by Registrar)."
I don't buy his analysis. As I said in a comment before. My birth certificate says "Filed" and it has a certificate number.
My analysis on the difference of "Filed" versus "Accepted" is this.
There is such a thing as a "Delayed Birth Certificate" There was a time when births were not officially recorded. There was also a time when territories were not states. (Like when DeCosta was born 1930) So in order to get a registered BC a relative had to fill out all the information and swear under oath that the information was true to the best of their ability.
So it is my opinion that these BC were "Accepted" as being true. Otherwise anyone who was born after these times their certificates were "Filed"
This is my opinion and I am going to stick with it.
Your thoughts goes along with ‘something I heard’. No link, so take this with a grain of thought.
I had sent the BC forgery stuff to someone I know. The info I got back was it was a forgery because he was born before HI was a state. So if that info is correct, that means his age is wrong too.