Because people are using the simple fact that he has a passport as proof that he was born in Honolulu.
It isn't.
And THAT, sir is the whole nub of the debate as to his citizenship and eligibility for the highest office in the land.
________________________________________
Did I infer that, let alone state it? No.
I wrote that knowing that he used a valid BC as proof would end the speculation just as knowing that he had to use different docs would strengthen the case.
>>>Because people are using the simple fact that he has a passport as proof that he was born in Honolulu.
It isn’t.<<<
bttt