Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
...
Dreams from My Father, A Story of Race and Inheritance by Barack Obama
Times Online, UK - Jun 14, 2008
Above all, he talks to his mothers parents in Honolulu, the liberal Gramps and Toot, who had migrated from Texas after his mother had been bullied for ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2044901/posts
Andy Martin’s worldwide bestseller goes to press as Obama campaign trembles.
ANDY MARTIN
Executive Editor
ContrarianCommentary.com
‘Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct’
pssst. You seem to have missed USMCobra’s post with the geneology info.
Best bet would be someone that lives downtown in all those condos. They can walk or take the bus easily. Otherwise you are talking several hours of traffic and difficulty finding parking.
:)
to be correct, the comment in bold came from THE OBAMA FILE - I placed a link to it above the image. However, when I tried to make the images fit the dates, nothing made sense to me either...
How can it be “going to press” and be a world-wide best seller? Just askin’, ‘cause it sure seems peculiar!
bwahahaha!
Lots and lots of pre-publication orders?
(I already ordered my copy)
Oh, now that maks sense. I used to do that with the Harry Potter books. (Sure can tell where MY priorities lay! Actually, I used those books to teach my nephew how to read.)
OK. I’ll stop picking on you.
(Besides in a couple weeks the micro fische cards will have gone missing)...
“WOSG, thanks for the link to that comment:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2040486/posts?page=1440#1440
You’re welcome.
“IMO trying to cast doubt on the validity of the deCosta document smells.”
Grrrrr. NOBODY is casting doubt on the validity of the deCosta document. It is valid. And KJC1’s form is valid. We have a document that is *exactly* like the Obama COLB. reported by a freeper, KJC1. The fact that other COLB forms might have a different format does not invalidate the Obama COLB. We have to conclude that, rather than insist that only “one way” is done, that both formats were validly used.
“WOSG, using this statement from that comment doesnt enlighten us in any way.”
Yes, it does. It elightens us that those claiming the Obama COLB is “a forgery” on the basis of “accepted by” vs “filed by” are spouting nonsense.
Please pay attention to the thread of the argument.
“What we need to see is a FILED dcument bearing seal.”
The impression of the seal in the Obama graphic of the doc has been identified. Tehy’ve delivered what you asked for.
The myth remains busted.
I used ‘em to try to pound morals into my more-or-less feral children...
Why can't they simply scan and post both sides instead of relying on graphically enhanced faint appearances of a seal? And then there is still the question of the signature block. Again, there are traces of smudges, but unlike the traces of the seal, the smudges can't be identified as being a signature block.
Thy myth isn't busted until Obama releases both sides of the document. By only show the front side with traces of certification and demanding that it be accepted as valid, he's continuing the perception that he only has one side of a document to show.
-PJ
Different master forms do NOT have the same date and revision letter.
Any change, no matter how minor, gets its very own revision number or letter.
To do otherwise is to breed utter chaos.
the first time I read that quote, I thought Stepgrandmother Sara is a little confused, she's mixing up her characters, Stanly Ann Dunham's mother's nickname was Toot, and Stanly Anne's second husband worked for an oil company. She's mixing them all up from what she was told at the first time that Obama visited Kenya. Just a simple village woman, really. Now lives in the UK, goes to pubs and plays bingo...
When utter chaos breeds, does it produce orderly delusions?
It produces plausible deniability.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.