To: delacoert
Hydrino theory is a complete and utter fraud.
Sorry, it's gone way beyond theory. See:
Comprehensive identification and potential applications of new states of hydrogen
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume 32, Issue 14, Pages 2988-3009 September 2007,
Randell L. Mills, a, , Jiliang Hea, Ying Lua, Mark Nansteela, Zhixiang Changa and Bala Dhandapania
BlackLight Power, Inc.,
493 Old Trenton Road,
Cranbury, NJ 08512, USA
See Weston's criticism of Edison* for a similar example of your response.
* 'I can scarcely believe it as possible that the article on the above subject [Edison's dynamo] in the last week's Scientific American could have been written from statements by Mr. Edison himself, inasmuch as so many of the advantages claimed for the machine described and statements of the results obtained are so manifestly absurd.'"
8 posted on
06/01/2008 2:32:59 PM PDT by
aruanan
To: aruanan
Is Mills still around?
For years and years, I’ve kept hearing that a revolutionary breakthrough from these folks is just around the corner.
If there have been any results, they haven’t been well publicized. Has anything been produced after all this time?
9 posted on
06/01/2008 3:51:42 PM PDT by
JC85
To: aruanan
10 posted on
06/01/2008 3:51:43 PM PDT by
JC85
To: aruanan
Sorry, it's gone way beyond theory.Bunkum, balderdash, blather, claptrap, drivel, garbage, idiocy, nonsense, piffle, poppycock, rigmarole, rubbish, tomfoolery, trash, and twaddle.
Maybe you held your divining rod too high over your head in the last thunder storm.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson