Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: beltfed308

I read the original post with close interest. I think the firing is appropriate.


7 posted on 09/22/2007 8:19:53 AM PDT by Blennos (High Point, NC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blennos

Good firing. The kid was pushing it with his attitude, and it seems like he is encouraging these confrontations, but the cop was definitely out of bounds. I’ve had several jerk officers over the years, and I’m a LEO supporter. The camera idea would be useful.


11 posted on 09/22/2007 8:29:17 AM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Blennos
I think the firing is appropriate.

I agree the firing was justified - The main reason is the missing video from the cruiser. The officer as much as admitted that he also was taping the event. Most of the worst conversation happened outside the car. Possibly the Sgt. thought if he got rid of the tape, he had a chance.

Most depts. require the tape to be turned in at the end of the shift. It allows for an independent review of an officer's conduct and treatment of citizens as well as recording evidence.

Officers don't have an option, not to turn in the tape. It would be like not properly recording evidence and keeping it instead of turning it in to the evidence room.

The Chief has a defendable position on the tape alone.

Also, good training methods today have taught officers how to take a smart-mouth and verbally judo him with soft responses. The smart-mouth can actually talk themselves into admitting an offense. The Sgt. strongarm tactics are old-school.

531 posted on 09/24/2007 2:29:09 PM PDT by Dustoff45 (A non-posting Freeper produces fewer spelling errors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson