Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Fred Thompson Have The Work Ethic He Needs To Be President?
Right Wing News ^ | 5/2/07 | John Hawkins

Posted on 05/02/2007 8:46:55 AM PDT by areafiftyone

Does Fred Thompson Have The Work Ethic He Needs To Be President?

A week or two ago, I was having a conversation about Fred Thompson and the person I was talking to said something like, "So, with all the columns he's writing and his admission that he has cancer, he's definitely running right?"

I told them that if I were betting, I'd say that he was running, but that there was a more significant chance than you'd think that he won't. Why?

Well, look at it from Fred Thompson's perspective. He has a reputation as a guy who doesn't particularly enjoy campaigning and let's face it; he has a pretty good life. He has a successful career as an actor, lots of money, and probably a good bit of leisure time to spend in a nice house with his attractive wife.

So yes, he's dipping his toes in the water to see what it feels like and yes, the water feels warm and inviting, but running for President is anything but a glamorous, exciting job, especially for someone like Fred Thompson.

Running for President means that you spend six to eighteen months with every 15 minutes of your 6 day a week, 12 hour plus schedule per day mapped out by staffers. It means thousands of calls to friends and admirers to ask them for money. It means constant travel. It means you need to enjoy plunging into a crowd and shaking hands for 20 minutes, talking to people at a rural mall, and sitting around in a diner in Iowa eating mashing potatoes and signing autographs. Meanwhile, during those 18 months or so, the press and your political enemies will be combing through your background and every word you say looking for a way to utterly destroy your reputation. Then, even after all that, only one candidate out of what, about 20 on both sides, is going to win the election?

Let's just put it this way; it's definitely not for everyone and judging by this article that appeared in the Politico, I'm not sure that running for President is right for Fred Thompson either.

"Thompson has not made a final decision but is on track to be ready to announce his candidacy in June or July, his advisers say. Thompson has already been polling better than some of the announced GOP candidates, and his entry would shake up a field that has left many Republican faithful dissatisfied.

...Thompson, his wife and advisers in Washington and Tennessee also are drawing up plans for a new style of campaign that would rely heavily on technology and his celebrity status to avoid some of the slogging through the snow in Iowa and New Hampshire that is normally required of White House hopefuls.

The advisers say Thompson, who plays District Attorney Arthur Branch on NBC's "Law & Order," is researching ways to use technology -- including the Web, videoconferences and teleconferences -- to harness the enthusiasm for his candidacy among grass-roots bloggers and activists. The campaign also would rely on large events, such as those that have in part supplanted country-store campaigning for some in the Democratic field.

"Well-known candidates can do things a little differently," explained one adviser. "You show up, you're accessible, but you don't have to go to every county seat several times."

...Originally, the idea of a late-start campaign for Thompson looked like something of a lark, but the phantom candidacy is accelerating. "The question is: Can he do it the way he wants to do it?" said another person helping plan the potential campaign. "With each passing day, he realizes that the answer is yes."

...So just how practical is a low-impact presidential campaign? Thompson's floundering campaign for Senate in Tennessee took off after he got his red pickup truck, and now he wants to bring a similar dash of showmanship to the '08 race. "Because of his name ID, he doesn't have to go diner to diner and church to church," said one adviser.

On the day Thompson revealed he has cancer, he hinted at an unorthodox blueprint when he said that he thinks it's possible to join the field without abandoning his family.

"Going on the road for months at a time, and for all practical purposes, just checking [in] every once in a while, I wouldn't do that," he told Fox's Neil Cavuto. "I don't think it has to be done that way. I know people will expect that of everyone -- to run frenetically around for years. And I don't do frenetic very well."

Let me translate what this statement means; "Because of his name ID, he doesn't have to go diner to diner and church to church." It means that Fred Thompson likes the idea of being President, but he doesn't want to do the hard work it takes to grab the brass ring.

Saying you want to be President, but you don't want to spend your time meeting with the citizenry is like saying you want to be a professional basketball player, but you don't want to go to the gym every day to practice.

It may be understandable that Thompson feels that way, because he currently has a very comfortable life, but if that's his attitude, the Republican Party would be better off if he didn't get in the race in order to ensure that someone who has the work ethic it takes to be President can capture the nomination.

I consult for the Duncan Hunter campaign through TCV Media.



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: fred; fredthompson; rfr; runfredrun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: WWTD; Politicalmom; Extremely Extreme Extremist; SE Mom; jdm; jellybean

The only question remains is, how will the “lazy” and “looks like hell” talking points be sold here tomorrow?

Only time will tell.


61 posted on 05/02/2007 1:54:13 PM PDT by Petronski (Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
This article does nothing but attack the man for no purpose than elevate another candidate. Sounds like the Democrat modus operandi of all ages, past and present.

That's also why this garbage was posted here.

62 posted on 05/02/2007 1:56:51 PM PDT by Petronski (Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: highball
This guy is a member of Hunter's team, and identifies himself as much. Everything he does, therefore, is a reflection upon Hunter's campaign.

I don't think it really reflects poorly on him. In fact, I'm glad Mr. Hawkins (and Dick Morris, for that matter) brought this up, since I think it's worth talking about what kind of nominee and what kind of President we want.

Do we want a politician who's mostly interested in kissing babies, raising money, and winning the Beauty Contest, or do we want someone who's going just going to tell us what he believes and what kind of President he's going to be, and let the voters decide? Do we want a man who polls incessantly so he can match his platform to the "public will", or do we want a man who will govern by his own principles and conscience? Do we want someone who thinks the President "runs the country", or someone who knows what the President's Constitutional role is? Do we want a follower, or a leader? Are we a democracy, or a republic?

So ask away, Mr. Hawkins. My answer's right below.
63 posted on 05/02/2007 2:01:43 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country. Thompson/Franks '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

LOL!

Great points all, every one of them.


64 posted on 05/02/2007 2:04:57 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

You know...I used to watch my mother walk through her life. She did everything at a measured, slow pace. I, on the other hand, ran around “frenetic”....tackling 16 things at once, hollering and shouting and “passionate” about everything.

My mother accomplished a shocking amount at her slow, leisurely pace...while I only appeared to:)


65 posted on 05/02/2007 2:08:13 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Run, Fred, Run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Work ethic to be President!? What the hell!?

I'm not a liberal who wants or expects 'my' president to 'work harder than he has ever worked' to perfect my life and everything in it.

I expect a president to leave me alone and uphold the Constitution--which leaves a helluva lot of time for golf and cocktail parties!

I want a president who works less coming up with BS to tax me to pay for.

Is this the kind of BS we can expect from Hunter's 'campaign'? Who are they trying to appeal to?

66 posted on 05/02/2007 2:09:30 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (Banning Bread and Circuses is the New Bread and Circuses....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

Excellent summation.


67 posted on 05/02/2007 2:11:20 PM PDT by Petronski (Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech
" looks for efficient ways to do the same amount work that other folks do with twice the effort. "

That's the way any job or work should be, why waste extra effort if you can do in differently in a more efficient way ?
68 posted on 05/02/2007 2:50:56 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
" Reagan took naps. "
" So what? "
Your right, so what is he napped, He's the boss.
It's probability better that he did take naps instead of him being dog tired and make mistakes from being a hothead because of being tired.
69 posted on 05/02/2007 2:54:58 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
John Hawkins' disclaimer: "I consult for the Duncan Hunter campaign through TCV Media."

Big Announcement: I Am Now Consulting For The Duncan Hunter Campaign
70 posted on 05/02/2007 6:19:35 PM PDT by Josh Painter ("The court basically said the Constitution means what it says and I agree with that" - Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

(sung to the tune of “For What It’s Worth”
as performed by the Buffalo Springfield)

There’s something happening here
What it is ain’t exactly clear
There’s a man dissin’ Fred over there
Telling me I got to beware
I think it’s time we stop, Fredheads, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down

There’s battle lines being drawn
Thompson’s right, and the leftists are wrong
Fred is out there speaking his mind
Getting so much resistance from behind
I think it’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down

What a field-day for the bots
All they do is diss Fred a lot
Sayin’ he’s lazy, and then this and then that
Close your eyes and you’ll hear a Democrat
It’s time we stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down

Fredophobia strikes deep
Into your thread it will creep
It starts when the bots are afraid
that Fred will run and blow Rudy McRomney away

We better stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
Stop, hey, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
Stop, now, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down
Stop, Fredheads, what’s that sound
Everybody look what’s going down


71 posted on 05/02/2007 6:43:47 PM PDT by Josh Painter ("The court basically said the Constitution means what it says and I agree with that" - Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sturm Ruger

Sturm - great link!

Did you read this little doozie on that same page?

“Additionally, while I am working on the campaign, I’m not planning to blog about any of the 2008 Republican contenders on RWN unless a story too big to ignore hits the wires. That’s because I don’t want to come across like a shill for Duncan if I eviscerate one of his opponents or talk him up.”

Dear Mr. Hawkins,

I give you credit for admitting you work for the Hunter campaign. However, you get an F for contradicting yourself and writing a hit piece on Thompson. As you predicted in your failed promise, you’re coming across as a shill for Hunter. Hunter should fire your butt immediately. He has no chance at the nomination, but could possibly get asked to be Thompson’s veep. Your screed does not help Hunter AT ALL.


72 posted on 05/02/2007 7:38:41 PM PDT by WWTD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

I love your tag line, I was thinking a few weeks ago that Franks would be perfect for VP.


73 posted on 05/03/2007 2:43:22 AM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside
They also said Reagan was lazy.

And Eisenhower. It's Point Two on the Democrap template for assessing Republican presidents.

74 posted on 05/03/2007 6:25:21 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
It's Point Two on the Democrap template for assessing Republican presidents.

The first one is Racist/Nazi.

75 posted on 05/03/2007 7:10:36 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside (Rudy Giuliani is just another "Empty Dress Republican")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RatsDawg
I used to like John Bolton for VP, but Tommy Franks fits the XO role better, and helps balance against Fred's lack of admin and military experience. I like Bolton for SecState.
76 posted on 05/03/2007 7:33:08 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country. Thompson/Franks '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
Also I think Franks is a lot like Fred, in regards that they both wouldn’t really want the job, but would take it for histories sake.
77 posted on 05/03/2007 2:47:26 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
Also I think Franks is a lot like Fred, in regards that they both wouldn’t really want the job, but would take it for Americas sake.
78 posted on 05/03/2007 2:47:41 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: WWTD

Those mentioned were not living in these perilous times.
The Presidency now has to be taken very seriously, to much at stake like threats of nuclear wars and possible annihilation of the human race. I definitely want my president to take the job seriously and have the stamina to be able to work.


79 posted on 05/04/2007 7:33:23 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: stopem

The early days of the republic were not “perilous times”???

Jefferson and Washington aren’t good enough for you????

I figured you for a Rudybot, but your posts are generally pro-Fred. Obviously, you completely failed to understand my post.

I still assert that who seek power the most are those who deserve it the least. For me, this is axiomatic.

And just because Washington and Jefferson did not yearn for the job does not mean they did not take it seriously. In fact, they were the two best presidents we ever had, in my opinion.

Also, do you realize who was the first American president to fight a war in the Middle East, which was won convincingly? Adams paid ransom to the Muslim thugs. When Jefferson took office, he said “millions for defense and not one cent for tribute” then kicked some major butt. Unlike you, I would welcome a president Jefferson.


80 posted on 05/04/2007 4:24:44 PM PDT by WWTD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson