Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India likely to pull out peacekeepers from Lebanon
http://www.india-defence.com/reports/2393 ^

Posted on 08/23/2006 10:29:56 AM PDT by Srirangan

The Indian Government is considering pulling out 775 Indian Army troops serving as part of the 1,990-strong UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).

"We are considering withdrawing of troops from Lebanon," Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee said here today. However, he made it clear that the pullout would not take place until the modalities are worked out.

With a new peacekeeping force comprising troops from Italy, France and some other nations shaping up to take over as a buffer force between Israeli troops and Hezbollah, India, according to diplomatic sources, wants to opt out.

The sources said the pullout could also be because the mandate of the new force would be peace enforcement rather than peace keeping. But the Indian troops are not likely to pull out before the expiry of the UN mandate on August 31.

(Excerpt) Read more at india-defence.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: india; lebanon; middleeast; unifil; unitednations

1 posted on 08/23/2006 10:29:57 AM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
...would not take place until the modalities are worked out.

I worked out some modalities once, it was quite painful.

2 posted on 08/23/2006 10:33:33 AM PDT by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

I would never submit to being under "French military leadership" (what a phrase)


3 posted on 08/23/2006 10:33:41 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

The current UNIFIL is toothless. Better for the IA soldiers to whoop some Jehadi @$$ in Kashmir where they actually have the right mandate.


4 posted on 08/23/2006 10:35:41 AM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan

They might as well. They weren't doing a very good job of it anyway!..........


5 posted on 08/23/2006 10:36:51 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
Anybody understand bureaucratese?

Other than "pulling out" I'm not sure what they said.

Is a reason given within all that gobbledegook?

What's the difference between "peace keeping" and "peace enforcement"? Does a jelly donut play a role here?

6 posted on 08/23/2006 10:38:34 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Good job of what? The troops are ordered to do nothing in Lebanon. UN, we all love 'em.
7 posted on 08/23/2006 10:38:51 AM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Please ask the UNSC.


8 posted on 08/23/2006 10:39:44 AM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
Can someone kindly explain what it is that peacekeepers do?I know in Lebanon,they are used as human shields,and in places like Darfur,can not say without being banned.Seems like they are pretty much toothless where ever they are.If you have weak leaders,you have weak troops.Someone needs to step up to the plate.Kofi??Get real.Hasn't he been there forever?It seems like it.
9 posted on 08/23/2006 11:38:19 AM PDT by xarmydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xarmydog

Depends on the mandate given to the particular force in the relevant UNSC resolution. Yes, UNSC has been pretty toothless in the last 60 years. A good waste of funds.


10 posted on 08/23/2006 12:30:59 PM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Srirangan
Please ask the UNSC.

The UN Security Council didn't post this article...

11 posted on 08/23/2006 1:09:59 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
The difference between "peace keeping" and "peace enforcement" is:
"peace keeping" = No guns
"peace enforcement" = Yes guns (maybe only water guns).
12 posted on 08/23/2006 3:28:27 PM PDT by Jack_1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Anybody who posts an article becomes the executive authority on the subject?


13 posted on 08/23/2006 10:31:05 PM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson