Skip to comments.
DUmmie FUnnies 06-01-05 (Scamdy Post-Hospital Thread On DUmmieland DELETED By Skinner!!!)
DUmmie FUnnies ^
| June 1, 2005
| Andy Stephenson, DUmmies, and PJ-Comix
Posted on 06/01/2005 8:07:19 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 1,021-1,035 next last
To: franksolich
No, You're still active. Just go to members list and see everything they haven't deleted on you/your posts etc.
I think they like you over there.
To: franksolich
Nah you would have gotten "The Question" from Gator.
If I haven't gotten that yet then I doubt that you have.
462
posted on
06/01/2005 7:37:10 PM PDT
by
txradioguy
(In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng Bn ...K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
To: cabojoe
To: PJ-Comix
No AM DUFU edition tomorrow since I have an early doctor's appointment. We'll take up a collection.
To: MarineMom613
Well, madam, you know, I liked it over there and all that, but it struck me the moderators are a little sensitive, and so when I was critical of losing my excellent masterpiece--a wonderful, splendid, polished, crafted masterpiece--over there, I figured I might have been shut off.
But really, madam, if you had seen that now-lost masterpiece, I am sure you would agree it was the finest piece of writing ever to grace the internet, anywhere.
It even beat the literary quality of the DUmmie PUnidiot "William Pitt."
So I got a little upset about it, and vented over here, and since they over there read over here, I figured, ooops, kicked out.
To: Charles Henrickson
To: Fenris6
Well, the mods at FR here sure have me spoiled. Never seen them disrupt a thread like the CU mods did.Mega Dittos.
I'm far behind on this thread, but wow was that ridiculous on CU today, lol! (And not just today, but today was the stupidest yet.)
467
posted on
06/01/2005 7:42:13 PM PDT
by
KJC1
(Somebody shook up the Ants!)
To: Charles Henrickson
This "receipt" has been tacked on the bb next to my monitor since you originally posted it. It is interesting to watch visitors' reactions to it; curiosity, astonishment (probably because unexpected), then uncontrollable laughter.
Belated thanks.
468
posted on
06/01/2005 7:45:34 PM PDT
by
Barset
To: Krodg
"The first check was for $25,000 and the second for $7,000. Have they changed the amounts on the checks??"
No. I was talking about the 2nd form that Pitt posted the other day. It gave two amounts due, one was 43,000 and the other was $7,000 for the doctor. Miss Waverly stated that the $50,000 did NOT include the doctor. This 2nd form states that the $50,000 includes the doctor. There is a discrepancy here in what they are putting out. I noticed this when AndyScam posted on CU and showed some of the old postings. I was just asking to see if anyone else noticed this. There are so many things wrong with this situation and this is just one more that I noticed.
To: beandog
I think it's mostly just a clique of people who got together to pretend they're more open minded that everybody else
I think for the most part they are conservative. If you check out the rest of the site it appears to be overwhelmingly conservative. I think the problem lies in:
- Way too many mods. (There's a new one every time you turn around, and they wear that label like a chip on their shoulder. Mods are allowed to break the rules, yet they are the first to tell you that you screwed up This is a lousy practice)
- Thread clean up (I don't understand the philosophy behind this practice, as it tends to change the whole perspective of the conversation.)
- Mods are allowed to post in the threads. (I thought a mod was like a hall monitor. By getting involved you develop a bias that has no business in the discussion)
- Personal attacks (they think it is entertainment. Unfortunately not everyone is so thick skinned as to ignore the "your momma is so......." jokes. Many folks take that real personal.)
- Difficult interface (My first complaint about this is no html. Maybe I'm spoiled, but it is a heck of a lot easier to work with since I have used it for better than 10 years. Others may not agree with this one. NO attachments until you get past the newbie stage I guess, I'm not clear on that practice.)
- Labeling of members (this is just a poor practice. If you think you get an initiation here, over there it is like walking on hot coals. They take great joy in letting you know you're a "noob". I just don't see how that advances the discussion at all.)
I give it a 5 out of 10............ 1 being the DUmpster and 10 being FR
470
posted on
06/01/2005 7:48:59 PM PDT
by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
To: Barset; SCALEMAN
This, from CU, by AndyScam, in response to Disgruntled:
Funny. No ..strange that you can't/won't divulge real proof that Scamdy has cancer, had surgery planned for may10th, or prove that the supposed 50k collected wasn't actually 500k.
For all the doubters....
Gary Stephenson was unavailable for comment all day. The two people I chose as independent enough to corroborate what Hopkins corporate relations told me yesterday contacted me at 4pm this afternoon asking me if I could get another Hopkins official on the record today so that they could confirm.
I called and came to an even better arrangement.
Tonight I will be submitting my questions to the office of the vice president and WILL be receiving written answers via email tomorrow afternoon some time. I have sought legal advise to craft as many questions as possible that will not require a hipaa violation for answers. As this site will probably not be hosting this discussion I will arrange for the "document"" (lol) to be prominently posted elsewhere.
Interested parties WILL find it.
To: MarineMom613; Ree
I went back and looked at that night. The proof that it was that night is the PM Scott sent to me (it does not talk about rules). Some giiberish I didn't and still don't get.
there were only three posts by me from two different threads that night. I know I posted more than that. They are gone. That site is contaminated! RUN AWAY! FAST!
472
posted on
06/01/2005 7:50:25 PM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
(Let's exercise the "Byrd" option!)
To: commonguymd
I don't think you were very combative at all. It's a little different there-- I'm not going to run off, but perhaps I'll lurk a little longer trying to figure it out. There does seem to be a battle of the mods going on.
To: cupcakes
I just don't see the point of trying to get any point across to the mods over at CU right now...They are fed up with all the chit and I think the whole Andy Scam mess has somewhat overwhelmed them...I know if I'd had to listen to all the chit flyin around..I'd be bi**hy too..
474
posted on
06/01/2005 7:51:19 PM PDT
by
ReeWalker
(Life isn't fair...GET USED TO IT!!!)
To: franksolich
Yeah, I saw this. But in all seriousness, hopefully andyscam will have some way for everyone to verify to their satisfaction that his documentation is "real". You know what I'm saying? If you can fabricate receipts (you can) than surely you can fabricate an email "conversation", right? I'm waiting with an open mind and probably too much anticipation!
To: ReeWalker
You know, I am confused.
When I was a "host" on the America On-Line "college football chat" (got free America On-Line service for it), I LOVED the brawls, I ate up the brawls, I lusted for the brawls.
Talk about vigorous intellectual stimulation, those brawls about college football.
So surely to be a good moderator, one has to love conflict and controversy.
To: CAluvdubya
I did you one better. I went back and looked through your replies as well as Any mod that may have been in those forums at those times ( I went between the 27th & 30th) Nothing there. I have been lurking there and the last 2 hours have been a riot. But like a train wreck I will hang around (lurking til 12 noon tomorrow) to see who else makes a cameo. I see already the Principal showed up tonite after the shutdown anouncement. Who knows, Maybe ANDY will pop in. :}
To: franksolich
What do you make of the latest "evidence" which even if true proves nothing?
Well I had to actually go out and do some chores........LOL... I have a horse trying to founder on me and she's a real pain in the natural flow of all that is serenity here on the ranch, so I have to catch back up.
If you are speaking of the checks, they certainly appear they have "doctored" them if they are indeed supposed to be the same ones we have seen before. That in itself suggests they cannot be trusted for any kind of evidence. I am to the point that anything they present now is a forgery until proven otherwise. They will hate that kind of scrutiny, but they have only themselves to blame.
478
posted on
06/01/2005 7:57:10 PM PDT
by
Allosaurs_r_us
(for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)
To: CAluvdubya
I'm not registered on that board but read everything there. What you are saying is what happened and it was told to you by "Scott".
It was erased. I tried to find it for you. It's gone.
To: CAluvdubya
You know I went back and looked to try and find it and I found it odd how little of your posts I could find, especially since it shows you to have way more posts than are actually there. Weird. I do know what you said is correct though. I don't know who said it (I'm terrible about names but great on facts).
Don't worry about it though, you still have us.
480
posted on
06/01/2005 7:57:44 PM PDT
by
beandog
(The only time I was wrong was the time I thought I was wrong)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 1,021-1,035 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson