To: Maelstrom
I don't consider Arnold a liberal. He has socially liberal ideas, so what. California is not electing a social director. California is in big financial trouble. Arnold has the backing and advisors who can fix the mess that California is in. He has the best economic minds on the PLANET.
What has McClintock done in his 22 years of ineffective legistlating? He made sure we got to where we are. We keep being told but his supporters that he is such a powerful man.
If so, why is he in bed with the Indian Casinos, not having any serious fundraisers, and running against a Republican instead of a democrat.
McClintock is nothing but an egomanical fraud.
736 posted on
09/17/2003 10:28:14 AM PDT by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(There is no shame in being poor, just dressing poorly.)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I think egomania is surrendering to megalomania, with a heavy dose of messianic complex. All things consider, very mentally unhealthy.
754 posted on
09/17/2003 11:49:43 AM PDT by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
McClintock has accomplished quite a bit in slowing down the race to create a liberal Utopia in California(i.e. total disaster).
Arnold...even as an actor...has helped create more government programs.
This is about Arnold, not McClintock. Let me remind you of the origination of this thread: conservatives are being told to vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Conservatives asked one question: Why?
And for that question we're being excoriated and ex-communicated.
759 posted on
09/17/2003 11:57:09 AM PDT by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson