Skip to comments.
"TOM McSELFISH = Gov. BustaMENCHA"
9/14/2003
| ALOHA RONNIE Guyer
Posted on 09/14/2003 10:05:38 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
NEVER FORGET
.."TOM McSELFISH =
...Gov. BustaMENCHA"
........was THE Sign to behold at this weekend's California Republican Convention held in Playa Del Rey next to the Los Angeles International Airport. So I did.
...No Convention Endorsement came for California Governor, but a posted Convention Straw Poll showed ARNOLD with nearly ..80%.. of the votes verses a little over ..18%.. for TOM McCLINTOCK.
...No one backed down this weekend, though it was hoped one Candidate for California Governor would, with Recall Election Financier Congressman ISSA watching it all unfold right before his very eyes.
Signed:.."ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer / Republican Convention Witness
NEVER FORGET
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740, 741-760, 761-780 ... 821-830 next last
To: SONbrad
I've made plenty of arguments and you have not addressed ANY of them. Since you have no argument, all is left for you is to attack me. You blame me for what you yourself do! - the very definition of hypocrisy.
If you want to vote for reprobates, you don't have to justify it - just do it!!
To: SONbrad
It can only mean ONE thing. Perhaps your writing is not up to par. Well, excuse me for not writing up to your standards in this informal forum. I didn't realize that my hurried rants were being so thoroughly scrutinized by such an expert as yourself. If I had known that, I would have taken more care (/sarcasm off). Perhaps you'd like to do a spelling check on all my posts - you might find another error or two, you pedantic coxcomb (look that up in your dictionary!!)
To: exmarine
Excuse me "exmarine" but you have consistently and repeatedly attacked anyone and everyone that disagrees with you. You have not made arguments other than to thump your Bible and denigrate others, then accuse others of attacking you!....now THAT's hypocrisy!
743
posted on
09/17/2003 11:27:23 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: exmarine
Please accept the text of what you wrote....
"He wrote the Federalist Papers."
What else could that mean. Please take responsibility for your actions.
744
posted on
09/17/2003 11:28:29 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: exmarine
As you continue to attack others for YOUR mistakes.
745
posted on
09/17/2003 11:31:11 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: SONbrad
Go away little boy. I don't have time for your childish games. You can't argue like an adult on the issues - you have to nitpick gramatical errors. Go away sonnie. I'm fresh out of time for you. Come back to me when you grow up and learn how to debate.
To: SONbrad
What else could that mean. Please take responsibility for your actions. Did or did not John Jay write Federalist papers? Yes or no? The answer is yes. I did not say he was the only one - did I? No, you misread what I said becuase you want to take the attention away from your pathetically compromised moral position. You can't argue issues - you can only nitpick and attack the messenger. Get lost little boy. Go watch another episode of Friends.
To: exmarine
Ah! The pot calling the kettle black.
Well argued ex-marine! Your C.O. would be proud...NOT!
748
posted on
09/17/2003 11:36:11 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: exmarine
No. He did NOT write the Federalist Papers as your post suggested. He was a CONTRIBUTOR to the Federalist Papers. If you can not be accurate and HONEST about that, how can we assume yuo are honest about anything else?
749
posted on
09/17/2003 11:37:28 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: exmarine
How can you MISREAD.....
"He wrote the Federalist Papers!"
????????
750
posted on
09/17/2003 11:38:14 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: SONbrad
I can't believe I have even responded to you at all. Come back when you grow up and are able to argue issues instead of attacking people. This is my last post to you little boy.
To: exmarine
I would wager that I am least as old as you...and much less pre-disposed to attack others as you have done again and again and again.
752
posted on
09/17/2003 11:40:40 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: exmarine
You just can't help with the name-calling. I pity you. Really.
753
posted on
09/17/2003 11:41:20 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I think egomania is surrendering to megalomania, with a heavy dose of messianic complex. All things consider, very mentally unhealthy.
754
posted on
09/17/2003 11:49:43 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: exmarine
JUST DO IT - VOTE SCHWARZENEGGER
755
posted on
09/17/2003 11:53:30 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: SONbrad
Exmarine, I got your LOVELY e-mail. What's the matter, were you embarrased to call me more names here?
756
posted on
09/17/2003 11:53:31 AM PDT
by
SONbrad
To: Redleg Duke
You say you support arnold because you aren't a single-issue conservative.
Given arnolds total lack of conservative issues, I suppose that makes you a ZERO-issue conservative. Perhaps you could provide a conservative issue to help persuade people?
This isn't about me, it's about Arnold and his liberalism.
Right now, we have a sum total of Zero (0) issues upon which Arnold is sincerely conservative.
Remember, Arnold *could* run as a Democrat. As a conservative, how does that make you feel about supporting him?
I would posit the notion that zero-issue conservatives are actually only moderate Republicans.
757
posted on
09/17/2003 11:53:52 AM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: SONbrad
A goofball is a goofball is a goofball
758
posted on
09/17/2003 11:55:19 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
McClintock has accomplished quite a bit in slowing down the race to create a liberal Utopia in California(i.e. total disaster).
Arnold...even as an actor...has helped create more government programs.
This is about Arnold, not McClintock. Let me remind you of the origination of this thread: conservatives are being told to vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Conservatives asked one question: Why?
And for that question we're being excoriated and ex-communicated.
759
posted on
09/17/2003 11:57:09 AM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: SONbrad
Post it out in the open, pretty please.
760
posted on
09/17/2003 11:57:28 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740, 741-760, 761-780 ... 821-830 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson