Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pheobe Debates The Theory of Evolution
Original scene from the show... Friends. ^ | NA | NA

Posted on 07/24/2003 1:55:39 PM PDT by Mr.Atos

I was just lisening to Medved debating Creationism with Athiests on the air. I found it interesting that while Medved argued his side quite effectively from the standpoint of faith, his opponents resorted to condescension and beliitled him with statements like, "when it rains, is that God crying?" I was reminded of the best (at least most amusing)debate that I have ever heard on the subject of Creationism vs Evolution, albeit a fictional setting. It occurred on the show, Friends of all places between the characters Pheobe (The Hippy) and Ross (The Paleontologist). It went like this...

Pheebs: Okay...it's very faint, but I can still sense him in the building...GO INTO THE LIGHT MR. HECKLES!!

Ross: Whoa, whoa, whoa. What, uh, you don't believe in evolution? Pheebs: Nah. Not really. Ross: You don't believe in evolution? Pheebs: I don't know. It's just, ya know, monkeys, Darwin, ya know, it's a, it's a nice story. I just think it's a little too easy.

Ross: Uh, excuse me. Evolution is not for you to buy, Phoebe. Evolution is scientific fact. Like, like, the air we breathe, like gravity... Pheebs: Uh, okay, don't get me started on gravity.

Ross: You uh, you don't believe in gravity? Pheebs: Well, it's not so much that ya know, like I don't *believe* in it, ya know. It's just...I don't know. Lately I get the feeling that I'm not so much being pulled down, as I am being pushed.

Ross: How can you NOT BELIEVE in evolution? Pheebs: [shrugs] I unh-huh...Look at this funky shirt!!

Ross: Well, there ya go. Pheebs: Huh. So now, the REAL question is: who put those fossils there, and why...?

Ross: OPPOSABLE THUMBS!! Without evolution, how do YOU explain OPPOSABLE THUMBS?!? Pheebs: Maybe the overlords needed them to steer their spacecrafts!

Pheebs: Uh-oh! Scary Scientist Man!

Pheebs: Okay, Ross? Could you just open your mind like, *this* much?? Okay? Now wasn't there a time when the brightest minds in the world believed that the Earth was flat? And up until what, like, fifty years ago, you all thought the atom was the smallest thing, until you split it open, and this like, whole mess o' crap came out! Now, are you telling me that you are so unbelievably arrogant that you can't admit that there's a teeny, tiny possibility that you could be wrong about this?!?

Pheebs: I can't believe you caved. Ross: What? Pheebs: You just ABANDONED your whole belief system! I mean, before, I didn't agree with you, but at least I respected you. Ross: But uh.. Pheebs: Yeah...how...how are you gonna go in to work tomorrow? How...how are you gonna face the other science guys? How...how are you gonna face yourself? Oh! [Ross runs away dejected] Pheebs: That was fun. So who's hungry?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 2,721-2,723 next last
To: Right Wing Professor
Similar timescale, but far more pupfish generations.

Okay, then American houseflies and Thai houseflies.

1,241 posted on 07/30/2003 8:33:51 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1239 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Okay, then American houseflies and Thai houseflies.

I honestly don't know anything about Thai houseflies.

1,242 posted on 07/30/2003 8:35:46 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
There's a specific situation that just popped up on the Darwin in a Box thread that I think relates to one of the clauses in the contract, the one forbidding bringing in material from old threads.

These debates occasionally dabble in actual science. Sometimes predictions are made by us or by our sources that can be tested by actual science. I think it is fair to bring these predictions forward to new threads, especially when someone claims they are crucial and new evidence becomes available.
1,243 posted on 07/30/2003 8:38:30 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1228 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
What do you think?

Well, since you have no science to back up your assertions, any guess is as good as yours. First, I think aesthetic beauty is often an objective quality, and is not in the eye of the beholder. Beauty exists (e.g. a sunset) because God exists. The many beautiful aspects of the universe were created by an eternal personality and the creation merely reflects His beauty. Humans are created in the image of the Creator and therefore can discern beauty.

1,244 posted on 07/30/2003 8:40:36 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1238 | View Replies]

To: conservababeJen
This is not directed at you. I have seen this twenty times in the last week from just about everybody.

Atheist, not Athiest. What was that rule about i before e, anyway?

I feel real bad about correcting spelling. My own posts are a mess.

1,245 posted on 07/30/2003 8:45:27 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1230 | View Replies]

To: js1138
There's a specific situation that just popped up on the Darwin in a Box thread that I think relates to one of the clauses in the contract, the one forbidding bringing in material from old threads.

I don't see the clause you're referring to.

1,246 posted on 07/30/2003 8:45:36 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1243 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
I honestly don't know anything about Thai houseflies.

You've never heard of "flied lice"?(it's a joke, it's a joke okay!)

1,247 posted on 07/30/2003 8:46:16 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1242 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
LOL good one.
1,248 posted on 07/30/2003 8:47:18 AM PDT by goodseedhomeschool (returned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
We will make no accusations concerning anything that may have been said or done prior to the effective date of this agreement.

More commentary, A-Girl (I fear this project you have bravely undertaken may be tricker than the Middle-East "Peace Process"):

Some of us have been here for years. Some of our disputes go back a long way. I'm aware of one freeper on the creationist side who has a history of posting erronious material and then never admitting it and never correcting his positions. Often, he will post the same declarations again, notwithstanding clear and unambiguous evidence that he is in error. There's no way to stop that, of course. But a response to such conduct is natural. It's not uncommon for his past transgressions to be mentioned -- often in a jocular way.

So my question: I don't mind forgetting about past unpleasantness, and past insults. Life is too short to dwell on such matters. But what do you think should be done with unadmitted factual errors? It goes to a person's credibility. We live on our track record here. We can't start each thread with a clean slate.

1,249 posted on 07/30/2003 8:53:05 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1107 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
:-)

All your lice are belong to us.

1,250 posted on 07/30/2003 8:53:05 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1247 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Is a sublime sunset hardwired or cultural?

A sublime sunset is nothing without an interpretive viewer, just as there are no faces in the clouds without an imaginative viewer. Our response is either hard-wired, culturally conditioned, or some of both. There is nothing inherent in the sunset.

1,251 posted on 07/30/2003 8:53:41 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1236 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
generic placemarker
1,252 posted on 07/30/2003 8:56:23 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1201 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/949088/posts?page=3443#3442

And following. this post makes a specific claim that can be tested. It also labels the claim as crucial to disproving evolution. This is something that can be followed, but take some time.
1,253 posted on 07/30/2003 8:57:43 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1246 | View Replies]

To: js1138
A sublime sunset is nothing without an interpretive viewer, just as there are no faces in the clouds without an imaginative viewer. Our response is either hard-wired, culturally conditioned, or some of both. There is nothing inherent in the sunset.

There is a viewer - God - who made it. Man merely looks upon it and acknowledges its beauty. This is an area where none of you can do anything but state your unscientific opinions.

1,254 posted on 07/30/2003 8:57:59 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1251 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Alamo-Girl; ALS
"That's what I thought. And I'm willing to overlook it and never bring it up again."

Your repsonse tells me and everyone that you still believe I was deceitful, dishonest, and insincere. There is absolutely nothing to be overlooked on my part.

Nothing.

You still have not admitted your character assination attack on me was inappropriate.

You are still spinning...of course you want everyone to moooove on.

No admission of my innocence, no admission of your mistake, no apology...well, then no overlook of your actions on my part. A simple "sorry" or "you didn't contrive any conspiracy" would have done. But you choose not to, so...

It will be brought up whenever necessary, which I expect to be often, unfortunately.

You are now officially bankrupt.

1,255 posted on 07/30/2003 8:58:49 AM PDT by NewLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1201 | View Replies]

To: js1138
If you want to study the idea of "sublimity," I recommend you pick up a copy of C.S. Lewis' Abolition of Man. It's a real eye opener.
1,256 posted on 07/30/2003 8:58:59 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1251 | View Replies]

To: js1138
What was that rule about i before e, anyway?

Apparently a faulty one!!!

1,257 posted on 07/30/2003 9:00:26 AM PDT by conservababeJen (If man evolved from monkeys and apes, then why do we still have monkeys and apes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1245 | View Replies]

To: All; PatrickHenry; CobaltBlue; betty boop; js1138
The draft agreement has now been posted to the Smokey Backroom here. I'm sorry it took so long, many of you will need to copy over your specific suggestions.

Thank you all for your good faith participation! Hugs!!!

1,258 posted on 07/30/2003 9:01:07 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1254 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
Thanks, ls, I appreciate your circumspection. You're hereby authorized to indicate me publicly in the future if the situation should arise again. I do find it very unfortunate that Sabertooth was banned (if anyone has any information on that, by the way, I'd much appreciate it), whereas... I probably shouldn't complete the sentence, seeing as how there appears to be a new mood developing that I don't want to spoil.

Anyway, I'm glad that there's been a return to the actual science in the last few hundred posts. Now that things are back on track, I want to ask a question of my own. I know I've brought this up in the past with others, but I don't think the discussion got too far. According to evolutionary theory, how much long-term evolution is the result of actual mutation - meaning something, like a cosmic ray or something, causing a gene to mutate; and how much of it is simply a result of shifting around existing genes through mixing of the parents' genomes? This gets back into the whole "micro-" vs. "macro-" evolution angle that I think needs to be resolved.

1,259 posted on 07/30/2003 9:04:06 AM PDT by inquest (We are NOT the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Your theory doesn't explain rap music, polka music, or velvet Elvis paintings.
1,260 posted on 07/30/2003 9:08:13 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Never voted for a Democrat in my life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1244 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,221-1,2401,241-1,2601,261-1,280 ... 2,721-2,723 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson