Skip to comments.
Who Is Your Favorite Philosopher?
Comte De Maistre
Posted on 06/25/2003 5:57:42 PM PDT by ComtedeMaistre
That was the question that George W. was asked in the 2000 campaign. Unfortunately, the questioner failed to provide a precise definition of how to define a philosopher.
A useful definition of a philosopher is anybody who has ever written a book on ideas. Anybody. Whether he is an economist, theologian, politician, mathematician, soldier, boxer, musician, historian, artist, psychologist, sociologist, anthropologist, biologist, physicist, athlete, etc, etc, etc.
Yes, I do recognize Yogi Berra as a notable philosopher. Even Barry Goldwater, notwithstanding the fact that his book, "Conscience of a Conservative" was ghost-written for him.
Certainly, if some of the well-read freepers know of philosophers noted for conservative ideas, their contributions are certainly welcome.
For my part, my favorite philosopher is the anti-enlightenment thinker, Joseph de Maistre (also known as Comte de Maistre). I regard him as the most authentic conservative intellectual of all time. Reading his works made me realize how the spread of moral relativism can endanger civilization.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-216 next last
To: ComtedeMaistre
Plato, Thomas Aquinas (standing in for all the Schoolmen), and as a wildcard, Henri Bergeson.
To: ComtedeMaistre
Genghis Ghandi.
Or maybe Hugh Hefner.
I heard Ayn Rand is really kewl, but a lot of people here have said that the liberty and individualism that objectivism represents is silly and bad, so I guess I think that whatever everyone else here says to do is right. I don't know what philosophy they follow. But they sure seem certain that bigger government is groovy if its THEIR tribe doing it.
So, in order to fit in, I guess my philosophy is whatever the tribe says it should be.
these flouride cookies are awesome.;-0
42
posted on
06/25/2003 6:19:16 PM PDT
by
galt-jw
(guess what? you've been had!)
To: Alberta's Child
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin? Wasn't he the moron who was conned by the whole "Piltdown Man" hoax? Lots of smart people were conned by the Piltdown hoax. I abhor de Chardin for his abominable theology. I give him a pass on Piltdown.
To: ComtedeMaistre
Two come to mind ......
Pericles and Testicles
44
posted on
06/25/2003 6:20:29 PM PDT
by
KnutCase
To: ComtedeMaistre
I'll stick with Mr. Bush's answer....
Christ
45
posted on
06/25/2003 6:21:00 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Skywalk
>>>I assume we're talking pure philosophy and not economic philosophers like Smith, Bastiat, etc?<<<
No, no. I specifically used the very broad definition that a philosopher is any person who has ever written a book on ideas. Any sort of idea. Even economic philosophers - Smith, Ricardo, Hayek, Keynes, and the rest of the gang.
Of course, I specified "ideas", so that a Freeper who maybe has only read Hardy Boys or Harry Potter, will not be able to offer up the names of the authors of those books as "philosophers". But, who knows?
To: strela
Without a doubt, Mark Twain I'll second that.
47
posted on
06/25/2003 6:23:36 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: galt-jw
Genghis Ghandi. Lol... a joke or a typo?
To: strela
Favorite ancient philosopher - Aristotle.
Favorite medieval philosopher - Ibn Khaldun
Favorite modern philosopher - David Hume.
To: ComtedeMaistre
Recently my daughter asked me what I knew of Nietzsche.
I replied " He thought God was dead, but it is he instead."
To: ComtedeMaistre
Jesus Christ is God, and God is God, not a philosopher. So I'll go with Kant for general philosophy, and Madison and Hamilton for political philosophy.
51
posted on
06/25/2003 6:26:41 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: ComtedeMaistre
Pogo
52
posted on
06/25/2003 6:28:34 PM PDT
by
Rudder
To: AnAmericanMother
LOL, how wonderful to see this here!
Well, and fondly, do I remember dragging my brother, who was a bona fide philosophy major from the University of Chicago (God alone knows how that was accomplished!), into the room to help me and my best friend get those philosophers' names right, so we could sing along.
As I just have! As I so often do! A thrilling tune, thrilling!
Oh, thanks MOM, you've really brightened my day!
My fave philosoph? Gotta say C.S. Lewis.
Or maybe Herr Budweiser, yeah, him too!
53
posted on
06/25/2003 6:29:00 PM PDT
by
jocon307
(You think I exagerate? You don't know the half of it!)
To: ComtedeMaistre
Dolly Parton
54
posted on
06/25/2003 6:30:13 PM PDT
by
Greg Packer
(Howell is my buddy. Leave 'im alone.)
To: ComtedeMaistre
. . . for two reasons.
55
posted on
06/25/2003 6:31:55 PM PDT
by
Greg Packer
(Howell is my buddy. Leave 'im alone.)
To: ComtedeMaistre
Gilbert Chesterton
56
posted on
06/25/2003 6:36:09 PM PDT
by
PMCarey
To: ComtedeMaistre
Soupy Sales, without question.
FMCDH
57
posted on
06/25/2003 6:37:05 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
To: fqued
>>>According to your "useful definition" of a philosopher, neither Socrates nor Jesus qualifies, since neither ever wrote a book or treatise that we know of. And yet, both of these qualify as philosophers of the first rank.<<<<
But their ideas were written down. That makes them philosophers.
That is why in my post, I mentioned Barry Goldwater, whose ideas were ghost-written by Bozell.
>>>Again, Buddha does not qualify<<<
Buddhas teachings have been written down. He would qualify.
>>>But, any Tom, Dick, or Harry who wrote a children's book does!?!<<<
I specifically excluded authors of children's books, from being mentioned as philosophers.
To: PMCarey; Greg Packer
Carey, is it just a coincidence that you named Chesterton right after Packer mentioned Dolly Parton? : )
59
posted on
06/25/2003 6:40:02 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: tortoise
>>Robert Heinlein <<
Very interesting answer. I was saddened by his increased impatience as he got older. His characters got more Perfect and more intolerant of anyone who couldn't tell a zygote from a gamete.
Even Laz Long probably couldn't measure up to what RAH expected from humanity.
But his obesrvations - "Notebook" , both pithy and precise, were certainly food for thought.
60
posted on
06/25/2003 6:40:50 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Peace through Strength)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-216 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson