Wrong.
Wow, another lame dodge from a creationist when challenged for support. Who'da thunk it?
It is evolutionists, who claim their theory to be science that need to give proof that random processes do indeed create complex systems. Evolutionists have been claiming this happens for 150 years. Seems to me it is time for them to put up or shut up.
Already been done, countless times. Check any of the literature on genetic algorithms, for example. It's amazing how far behind you are.
[First, evolution does not "discard" DNA "information"]
Yes, they did, and some still do
Try to work on your reading comprehension. We're talking about what evolution as a process does, not people. That's why the word "evolution" appears in that sentence, not "evolutionists". I hear that "Hooked on Phonics" can work wonders, give 'em a call.
even after it has been abundantly proven that it is what evolutionists have moronically called 'junk DNA' that really makes an organism run.
TROLLING again, eh? Your own links disproved this running gag of yours. Get some new material.
Real scientists call it 'non-coding DNA' meaning it does not code for proteins.
Yes, and I'm the one who explained that to you. Because it's true.
Evolutionists claim several times a week on these very threads that the DNA not in genes can be altered willy nilly and 'proves' evolution because it is there to show descent not any intrinsic purpose.
There are about three things wrong with your summary, so I'll just send you back to work on it until it more resembles what people have actually said. Shoo.
It is the total disregard for purpose in the organism that has brought evolution down to nonsense.
That *would* be nonsense if that's a position that people held, but it's not. Only *you* are saying something that silly.
Philosophically it was a dead end. Scientifically it was a dead end. So as soon as science learned enough it showed that the evolutionist view that life is purposeless and just a random amalgam of atoms is total bunk.
Let me know when you wind down and are willing to discuss the evidence again.
Try to work on not spewing garbage. The fact is that evolutionists called DNA not in genes "junk DNA" and said that it was there only to prove evolution. Well all biological scientific work going on now is disproving that moronic and arrogant assertion by evolutionists. Just recently they found that some 10% of that "junk DNA" is needed for the very essential process of splitting the cell in two when it replicates. Nevertheless, the morons of evolution continue to claim almost every day that this or that DNA is just there to show how long it has been since two species separated. As if the number of changes in DNA had nothing to do with functioning. Only evolution - the anti-science - is stupid and arrogant enough to claim that 95% of our genome is just there for no purpose at all. Real scientists quickly laughed at such a ridiculous statement and plowed ahead in finding out just what its function was.