Try to work on not spewing garbage. The fact is that evolutionists called DNA not in genes "junk DNA" and said that it was there only to prove evolution. Well all biological scientific work going on now is disproving that moronic and arrogant assertion by evolutionists. Just recently they found that some 10% of that "junk DNA" is needed for the very essential process of splitting the cell in two when it replicates. Nevertheless, the morons of evolution continue to claim almost every day that this or that DNA is just there to show how long it has been since two species separated. As if the number of changes in DNA had nothing to do with functioning. Only evolution - the anti-science - is stupid and arrogant enough to claim that 95% of our genome is just there for no purpose at all. Real scientists quickly laughed at such a ridiculous statement and plowed ahead in finding out just what its function was.
Try to work on not spewing garbage.
Go back and reread the posts in question until you see where you made a mistake concerning what was being said. I'll wait...
The fact is that evolutionists called DNA not in genes "junk DNA" and said that it was there only to prove evolution.
I already dealt with that false sloganeering of yours -- not just on this thread, but at least six times on other threads. Get some new material.
Nevertheless, the morons of evolution continue to claim almost every day that this or that DNA is just there to show how long it has been since two species separated.
No they don't, but thanks for demonstrating yet again how badly you can misunderstand what scientists have actually said.
Only evolution - the anti-science - is stupid and arrogant enough to claim that 95% of our genome is just there for no purpose at all.
Have you forgotten the time you were challenged to document that it's not, and you bone-headedly posted a link to an article that VERIFIED it?
Yeah, I guess you have.