Wrong. It is evolutionists, who claim their theory to be science that need to give proof that random processes do indeed create complex systems. Evolutionists have been claiming this happens for 150 years. Seems to me it is time for them to put up or shut up.
First, evolution does not "discard" DNA "information"
Yes, they did, and some still do even after it has been abundantly proven that it is what evolutionists have moronically called 'junk DNA' that really makes an organism run. Real scientists call it 'non-coding DNA' meaning it does not code for proteins. Evolutionists claim several times a week on these very threads that the DNA not in genes can be altered willy nilly and 'proves' evolution because it is there to show descent not any intrinsic purpose. It is the total disregard for purpose in the organism that has brought evolution down to nonsense. Philosophically it was a dead end. Scientifically it was a dead end. So as soon as science learned enough it showed that the evolutionist view that life is purposeless and just a random amalgam of atoms is total bunk.
Ah, LBB's back, so Con X-Poser will probably disappear for awhile. We've given you plenty of evidence on this and other threads (remember "29 Evidences of Macroevolution?"). I forgot, you don't do links because they might lead you to think.
BTW, creationism doesn't win by default. If you ain't got nothin' you aren't even in the running. We know you're a YEC (you deny it, but your posts betray you). What is your evidence for a young Earth?
Wrong.
Wow, another lame dodge from a creationist when challenged for support. Who'da thunk it?
It is evolutionists, who claim their theory to be science that need to give proof that random processes do indeed create complex systems. Evolutionists have been claiming this happens for 150 years. Seems to me it is time for them to put up or shut up.
Already been done, countless times. Check any of the literature on genetic algorithms, for example. It's amazing how far behind you are.
[First, evolution does not "discard" DNA "information"]
Yes, they did, and some still do
Try to work on your reading comprehension. We're talking about what evolution as a process does, not people. That's why the word "evolution" appears in that sentence, not "evolutionists". I hear that "Hooked on Phonics" can work wonders, give 'em a call.
even after it has been abundantly proven that it is what evolutionists have moronically called 'junk DNA' that really makes an organism run.
TROLLING again, eh? Your own links disproved this running gag of yours. Get some new material.
Real scientists call it 'non-coding DNA' meaning it does not code for proteins.
Yes, and I'm the one who explained that to you. Because it's true.
Evolutionists claim several times a week on these very threads that the DNA not in genes can be altered willy nilly and 'proves' evolution because it is there to show descent not any intrinsic purpose.
There are about three things wrong with your summary, so I'll just send you back to work on it until it more resembles what people have actually said. Shoo.
It is the total disregard for purpose in the organism that has brought evolution down to nonsense.
That *would* be nonsense if that's a position that people held, but it's not. Only *you* are saying something that silly.
Philosophically it was a dead end. Scientifically it was a dead end. So as soon as science learned enough it showed that the evolutionist view that life is purposeless and just a random amalgam of atoms is total bunk.
Let me know when you wind down and are willing to discuss the evidence again.