"Jacko" Is One Sick Puppy!

[Valkster]

You want to read something SICK. Go to www.thesmokinggun.com and find the actual court papers filed by the 13 year old boy the Michael Jackson had the "settlement" with a few years ago.

[Eaker]

I wouldn't want some of you on my jury

When do you go on trial?

You certainly seem to be "trial ballooning" your case here on FR.

Stay safe; stay armed.
Eaker Freeper Status

[Sungirl]

Actually....I have jury duty next month.

[Eaker]

the kid could of peeked at mommas command

What kind of perverted world do you live in????

No children ever see my penis......EVER!!!! If you think that grown men walk around showing kids their penis you better have a little talk with your dad. Unless this is the reason that you make this assumption.

As I have said before.....you really need help.

Stay safe; stay armed.
Eaker Freeper Status

[Eaker]

Actually....I have jury duty next month.

You did not answer my question.

Stay safe; stay armed.
Eaker Freeper Status

[Sungirl]

I need help? Did you read what you wrote? You answer with your tasteless accusations to statements that I never made. You make no sense.
Take the words 'peek' and 'show'. Totally different things. I said 'peek' and you insinuate I said 'show'. I think you have trouble with comprehension too.

Do you discuss these things with your dad? (shudders)

[Eaker]

I need help?

Yes you do.

Did you read what you wrote?

I have trouble believing that you could ask such a stupid question.

You answer with your tasteless accusations to statements that I never made. You make no sense. Take the words 'peek' and 'show'. Totally different things.

Why would Wacko Jacko put himself in a position with little boys such that they can "peek"? It is clear that he wants to "show".

For a man to put himself in a position that could in ANY way allow a child to see his penis is reprehensible!!!!!!!!! What part of this do you not understand?????????

I said 'peek' and you insinuate I said 'show'. I think you have trouble with comprehension too.

I am insinuating nothing. I am clearly stating that no child can come into a NORMAL man's home and get a "peek" at his penis without the man showing it to him on purpose. How slowly do I have to type this for you to understand it????

Do you discuss these things with your dad? (shudders)

I don't need to as I understand modesty and propriety. I recommended that you do so if he is the reason that you think men sleep with, and show their penises to children. If this is the case maybe it explains you a little better.

Stay safe; stay armed.
Eaker Freeper Status

[Ben Bolt]

What's the frequency Kenneth ?

[Clinging Bitterly]

>>...a case where an innocent person paid off someone...

I dunno if this is the case here or not. I know there are plenty of cases where people are falsely accused.

I'd like to think there has been a bona-fide investigation and justice is being served. But instead, I think he did it.

Dave in Eugene

[discostu]

You really should take that tag back. You are quite obviousloy deliberately IGNORING the evidence. You don't need one word from Chandler or any other child to KNOW beyond ANY POSSIBLE doubt that Jacko is a child molestor. He's admitted it. He doesn't think he's admitted it, but he most clearly has. Any one that knows ANYTHING about child molestors can look at what he says and see a textbook MO. He rapes boys for fun. Defending him make YOU evil. Stop doing it. And stop pretending you're taking the high road, you're down in the low road with an admitted child rapist.

[Chemnitz]

I went to a conference where a man spoke about children being molested. He looked as if he was always going to cry. He was almost 60. Then he said he had been molested as a child. Obviously it had deeply affected him. It made me incredibly sad to see how one evil predator's actions had made him miserable.

I have tried to deal with one sexual predator in the Protestant church. I had all the facts and I still failed. Everyone stepped in to protect him. All the church officials were his champions. The ordinary ministers did not give a hoot. He was allowed back into the ministry and is still serving a congregation.

I was glad this boy's father went after Jackson. That really broke the silence. Obviously many others have been paid off. Jackson had Philippine housekeepers who had diaries and were ready to talk. Suddenly they were silent and headed back to the Philippines. I imagine they retired in great luxury.

It really peeves me that some people call parents gold-diggers when they sue this creep. How else does one define damage? How else does one pay for therapy? It is true that they should have supervised their children - all these parents - but it is also true that MJ is obviously a professional seducer, doing a little at a time, gaining trust of everyone, making everyone dependent on the buzz from special trips, presents, etc.

[Ben Bolt]

And here you admit even if you had solid proof you still would have to jump to conclusions , speaking of jury duty .
Be gone with you malcontent .

[Experiment 6-2-6]

Don't bother trying to edumcayte Sungirl. She only seems to care when animals are abused. Then you'll see her dander get up.

LOL! You beat me to the punch. Of course, I'm not sure she cares about any of Michael Jackson's pets, either. I'm SURE he doesn't abuse or mistreat them!

[Experiment 6-2-6]

You make no sense.

If I recall, sungirl, you were horrified at one freeper who gave a kitten a bath by placing it in a tub of water up to it's nose.

Yet, here you have MJ taking baths with a child, and indeed, it appears did even more, a child who potentially could be traumatized for life, with admissions by MJ himself about "sharing" his bed, and you are reluctant to cast blame.

I always thought you were way too wrapped up in cute fury animals for your own good, to the point where you have lost all touch with reality...

[Sungirl]

He's admitted it.

He's admitted it? Raping boys? I'd like to see that please.

He doesn't think he's admitted it, but he most clearly has. Any one that knows ANYTHING about child molestors can look at what he says and see a textbook MO. He rapes boys for fun. Defending him make YOU evil. Stop doing it. And stop pretending you're taking the high road, you're down in the low road with an admitted child rapist.

I'm on the fence..I've said this over and over....I need more evidence from something a 13 yr old wrote and is circulating on the internet. I also read that that avidavid can't even be substantiated that it is word for word..in otherwords..IT WAS COPIED TO THE INTERNET AT FREE WILL.....GOd knows what was added or deleted. You shouldn't form such a harsh opinion when the facts are clearly missing. I think you just don't like him personally and formed your opinion from that.

[Eaker]

Don't try to twist this into me being the sicko here. If one reads all of your posts the person that is sick is quite clear. YOU brought up all of the "normal" peek-a-boo BS NOT me.

You are defending an admitted pedophile. You should expect harsh words. It is clear that you care more about protecting kittens than children and that simply is not normal and will not make you any friends here.

Perhaps you should report yourself.

Eaker

[discostu]

I've showed you where he's admitted it. The behavior he professes to, the behavior he suggests everyone try (which is is itself part of the admission, check NAMBLA's website), is an exact match of all of the warning signs and methods. If somebody has admitted to having feathers, a beak, webbed toes, being comfortable both in the air and on water and enjoying a diet of fish I have no trouble calling them a duck. Jacko has admitted to being obsessed with children, to developing childish relationships with children, to lavishing them with gifts, to having them sleep both in his and in his bed; thus I call him a child molestor, and so should you.

You're not on the fence, you're in deliberate denial. You're ignoring the evidence put before. You continue to obsess on the kid and even to accuse the kid (my what a standard rape defense tactic, accuse the accused, next you'll be saying he wore provacative clothing to entice Jacko). None of what I've put forth revolves around Chandler, it all comes straight from Jacko. You're damn right I don't like him, I don't like child molestors. There were three basic reactions when the Chandler story first broke: suprise, lack of suprise, and suprise it took so long. I was in the last group, it had been obvious to me for quite a while that Jacko was a molestor. I can't even say the Chandler story confirmed my suspicions because Jacko himself had done that long before. Jacko's victims are starting to reach the age of admission, late 20s to early 30s are when most victims "come out" (which is one of the reasons molestors have such long careers, it's very rare a victim will aknowledge what's happened until adulthood). In the next 5 to 10 years there's going to be so much more evidence even you won't be able to ignore it.

[Sungirl]

Nah..I think he's innocent.

[Sungirl]

I'm talking about you bringing up my father ...horrible stuff. You're sick.

[discostu]

Nevermind the facts, Sungirl has already decided this matter. According to Sungirl this is all the product of a gold digging mother, nevermind that it was the FATHER that filed suit, nevermind Chandler's knowledge of certain physical characteristics that could only be learned during sex, nevermind that Jacko's behavior is textbook child molestor MO. Sungirl has spoken and all those that disagree are big meanies, and probably cruel to animals. Only evidence that supports her position actually exists, everything else will be greated by the sight of Sungirl with her fingers in her ears yelling "LALALALALALALALA" until it is banished to the hell from which it came. Thus it is written on this 10th day of February in the year of Our Lord two thousand and three.