[Eaker]

I need help?

Yes you do.

Did you read what you wrote?

I have trouble believing that you could ask such a stupid question.

You answer with your tasteless accusations to statements that I never made. You make no sense. Take the words 'peek' and 'show'. Totally different things.

Why would Wacko Jacko put himself in a position with little boys such that they can "peek"? It is clear that he wants to "show".

For a man to put himself in a position that could in ANY way allow a child to see his penis is reprehensible!!!!!!!!! What part of this do you not understand?????????

I said 'peek' and you insinuate I said 'show'. I think you have trouble with comprehension too.

I am insinuating nothing. I am clearly stating that no child can come into a NORMAL man's home and get a "peek" at his penis without the man showing it to him on purpose. How slowly do I have to type this for you to understand it????

Do you discuss these things with your dad? (shudders)

I don't need to as I understand modesty and propriety. I recommended that you do so if he is the reason that you think men sleep with, and show their penises to children. If this is the case maybe it explains you a little better.

Stay safe; stay armed.
Eaker Freeper Status

[Terriergal]

I have trouble believing that you could ask such a stupid question.

You do??

[Terriergal]

Would people have any trouble believing he's a pervert if he slept with little girls?

"oh it's totally platonic, really. We just go to sleep!" Sure they run around in their underwear, but it's because we're all just little kids!

Duh... Regardless of MJ's stunted emotional growth, he has no right to (at *BEST*) exploit and damage the sexual modesty of children to placate his screwed up longing to still be a child.

In fact, don't most pedos have that stunted emotional development thing going on?