Replies

The whole point of this is he went in front of a Grand Jury and gave statements, then he is on TV giving 2 different versions of the Jeep and how it got off his lot. "it disappeared" or "Ricci came in to pick it up", a lawyer defending Ricci will see these conflicts with the Mechanic's story.

163 posted on 06/30/2002 4:41 PM PDT by brigette

How does Brigette know what Moul testified to in the GJ? Of course she does not know, she was not there. She quotes Moul as testifying to the GJ that the jeep "disappeared" OR "Ricci came in to pick it up." Which one did Moul testified to? Did he say "it disappeared" or that "Ricci came in to pick it up"? And how did Brigette got hold of this secret testimony? You know what, it's not that I think she made it up, SHE MADE IT UP! Unless someone can show me that the two quotes were made by Moul at the GJ, they are invented quotes.

Later on post 173 of the same thread, brigette writes:

Please don't think I think the mechanic is lying... it seems he is confused and not sure what really happened at some points. If he gave a statement to the grand jury, where he says... Yes... Mr. Ricci came in on May 31st and I saw him there, but did not speak to him. The he gets on TV and says, well the Jeep disappeared 2 days before the kidnapping.

173 posted on 06/30/2002 4:56 PM PDT by brigette

On post 163 she says that Moul gave two contradictory statements, now on post 173 she says "if he gave a statement..." So which one is it, did Moul gave a statement or did he not? Not only brigette is not sure whether Moul testified that Ricci came in to pick up the jeep, she know says that the first statement (in post 163) that "it disappeared" wasn't part of Moul's testimony at the GJ, but only a statement that he professed on TV.

Neither I, nor brigette, nor anyone of you know what Moul testified at the JG. No one knows, except the persons that were present during his secret testimony. And you post what someone posted as sacrosant and believe it?

TO PALLADIN: thanks for the link.

Post #330

Regarding Moul testifying before the Grand Jury, I believe the general consensus here is that he did. Furthermore, RC, the person testifying may speak about his testimony. It is not secret, except concerning the members of the GJ.

Sherl, you'll correct me if I'm wrong.

And, no, I don't think RC is Jolly. Maybe one of his converts, though.

"How does Brigette know what Moul testified to in the GJ?"

I was posting a previous post I found interesting.
As I noted, it was Brigette's post, so I'll ping her about your questions.

"And how did Brigette got hold of this secret testimony? You know what, it's not that I think she made it up, SHE MADE IT UP! Unless someone can show me that the two quotes were made by Moul at the GJ, they are invented quotes."

Lakey posted an answer to your post below. As far as I know, Lakey has the correct understanding about Grand Jury testimony. Again, I'll just ping Brigette ans aask her if she wants to reply to your post.

"Regarding Moul testifying before the Grand Jury, I believe the general consensus here is that he did. Furthermore, RC, the person testifying may speak about his testimony. It is not secret, except concerning the members of the GJ."