Posted on 09/21/2002 5:49:50 PM PDT by Libloather
Liberteens come, and Liberteens go. But they seem to have an awful time with their own (and biggest - maybe only) issue - pot.
As far as anyone can tell, not ONE person has been placed behind bars for smoking pot. But the Liberteens paint an entirely different picture. They claim that HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS are behind bars for smoking.
Can anyone provide any proof either way?
"As far as I know, ironically, there is no law that prohibits smoking marijuana."
But that isn't what scholar sez.
Our prison system is overburdened with non-violent, pot-smoking "criminals" while the big time dealers never find their way to prison. In the meantime, child molesters are given suspended sentences and walk free. I cannot begin to grasp the logic of our criminal justice system.
Maybe scholar is wrong - eh?
When that become relevant, I'll let you know...
Harry Anslinger especially targeted black musician users for federal jail until one of our presidents told him to cut it the hell out.
There is a(n) (in)famous case here in Oregon of a black musician sent several times to Sheridan for possession. It is not high on federal prosecutor's list of things to do, but it is a federal crime worth 6 mo. to a year in a federal pen, usually suspended in return for mandated "therapy", for a virgin offender, so if a constable brings it in, they will prosecute. And if the offense is repeated enough, it will bring a prison term.
You are, I presume, aware that the BofP publishes stats on this question every year, promptly followed up by BofP apologists who like to suggest that all the people in prison for pot, are really in prison for some major crime that got bargained down. Are you comforted?
Personally ... my pot days ended in 1981. I discovered it in '66.
In all that time, I've never been busted for reefer ... plenty of drunk over-nighters, but no drug busts.
Once, I was busted as a public drunk and the cops found an empty 'Boro pack with some acidic aspirin (We were clever in those days) in it.
They sent it off to the lab for analysis, but I convinced the judge they were just aspirin and I walked after promising never to get caught drunk again on the streets of Bostson>
I remember telling this story to my freinds that night in some joint (maybe the original CHEERS) somewhere in Kenmore Square that night ... right before I passed out or went into a walking coma.
Don't really know ... can't remember $h!t.
That's why 1981 is so memorable ... I met Jesus, quit drinking and drugging.
Cigarettes are an entirely different addiction.
You're really helping me out - no?
That wasn't the question. Again, when that become relevant, I'll let you know...
The Marxists are still using that example in black neighborhoods to stir up strife and resistence against "The Man."
In the Marxist paradise, the state will wither away and everyone will be free to smoke pot all day long if they so desire.
Sounds a lot like the libertarian paradise.
I'm kewl wiff it, but it still doesn't answer the question.
The question is - Has ANYONE ever been imprisoned for smoking pot?
Wanna try again?
No... but to smoke pot, you must posess it, and hence smokers have gone to jail, for posession.
You have proof of such an entity as a "Liberteen"? (A freedom lover under twenty yet older than twelve?)
Or you just looking to empty a spray can?
M
"As far as I know, ironically, there is no law that prohibits smoking marijuana."
That quote was from me to you over on this thread: Drug Czar on Anti-Marijuana Crusade. (An interesting juxtaposition between myself and liblother.)
IMO, it is a misnomer that smoking marijuana is prohibited by law. As far as I know there is no law that prohibits smoking marijuana. There are laws prohibiting possession of marijuana.
In a court of law the distinction is critical. One act can result in a court trial, the other doesn't. One act can result in being sent to prison, the other can't.
This forum is not a court of law and it is logically assumed by the vast majority of people that in order to smoke marijuana a person must have marijuana in their possession.
You appear to be making a very petty argument.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.