Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cobb (County, GA) dads enter fray over evolution in schools
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 9.8.02 | MARY MacDONALD

Posted on 09/07/2002 7:55:51 PM PDT by mhking

Larry Taylor
Jeffrey Selman
[ The Atlanta Journal-Constitution: 9/7/02 ]

Cobb dads enter fray over evolution in schools

By MARY MacDONALD
Atlanta Journal-Constitution Staff Writer

When Jeffrey Selman learned the Cobb County public schools had put disclaimers on evolution in thousands of science books, he skipped his usual outlet, a letter of protest.

The 56-year-old computer programmer sued the district to remove the textbook stickers. And he is ready to broaden the suit's scope if the school board allows science teachers to discuss what he sees as faith-based alternatives to evolution.

"I saw something wrong, and I went after it," Selman said.

Five miles away, in another east Cobb neighborhood, Larry Taylor had his own visceral reaction to the debate over science and religion.

Well-read and articulate, Taylor grew tired of seeing critics of evolution dismissed as uneducated rubes.

The construction manager attended his first school board meeting two weeks ago to urge members to require teachers to expose flaws in evolution.

"If it raises tough questions in the classroom, that's why they're there," Taylor said.

The men, both fathers of students in east Cobb schools, inserted themselves into a fray that neither expected would turn national. Both have found the attention unsettling. They worry about the impact on their families and will not disclose the names of their wives or children. Both screen phone calls. But neither regrets taking a public stance on an issue that has divided Cobb and drawn national media attention.

The board vote on instruction policy is set for Sept. 26.

Selman: I'm a patriot|

The division among parents is unprecedented, said board Chairman Curt Johnston, who is receiving 15 messages a day, divided on either side. "This is the most difficult and polarized debate the board has had since I've been on the board," he said. "Right now, we're just listening."

Selman, the plaintiff in a lawsuit filed against the district by the American Civil Liberties Union, said his decision to seek court intervention took perhaps "half a second." A transplanted New Yorker, Selman wants people to know he believes in God. A practicing Jew, he attends temple several times a year. He does not want to be equated with the California atheist whose challenge of the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance drew national scorn.

Selman describes his lawsuit as a patriotic action, stopping a move toward government-sanctioned religion. While the textbook advisories are vague, Selman and many other parents think the school board discussions that produced the inserts reflect a conservative Christian intent.

The advisories were approved after the board heard about two dozen parents protest the teaching of evolution, many on religious grounds. They produced a petition signed by nearly 2,000 parents who demanded accurate science texts. Many petitions circulated in Cobb churches.

A counterpetition is now circulating among pro-evolution parents, who will demand that the board maintain "traditional academic standards and integrity in the sciences."

Selman isn't sure what sparked the anti-evolution movement in Cobb, a county he and his wife chose nearly 10 years ago based on the good reputation of its schools. He thinks the board is pandering to a small group of parents. His own actions have produced a few dozen phone calls to his home, more supportive than not.

"This is one battleground," said Selman, who has a child in elementary school. "I'm sure they're not going to stop at this. The next thing, the moment of silence is going to be attacked, which is a beautiful piece of compromise."

Nancy Myers, a co-worker, wasn't surprised that Selman became involved in the dispute. "He's got a hot justice button," she said. "When he sees wrong being done, he wants to do something about it. I'd call him principled."

Although Selman thinks his lawsuit will squash any attempt to dilute evolution, he suspects the board policy will open classrooms to religious-based instruction. "The side for scientific education was asleep," he said. "We felt safe. This is the 21st century, for crying out loud. We can't go back to this."

Taylor: Teach all facts|

Taylor, 41, moved to Cobb as a child and was educated in its public schools. But like Selman, he now questions whether the county schools live up to their generally good reputation. He has two daughters and a son, in middle and high school.

While he disagrees with biological evolution, Taylor will not identify himself as a creationist or an advocate of "intelligent design," which argues that the diversity of life is the result of some master plan by an unidentified "designer."

But Taylor has read "Darwin's Black Box," a challenge of evolution by a biochemist at Lehigh University, and a stack of other books that question evolution. He has given copies to friends and co-workers.

Taylor believes these critiques, many written by scientists if not biologists, are being ignored unfairly by public school teachers and the media. "The media presents it as the educated scientists vs. the religious, fanatical extremists."

He was particularly angered when science teachers told the Cobb school board that criticism of evolution was based in religion.

"All the facts should be taught in the science class," he said. "There are many credible scientists in America who believe evolution has many flaws."

Taylor attends his church, Trinity Fellowship in west Cobb, twice weekly. The Rev. Richard Hemphill said the church had not become involved with the evolution dispute. Taylor has spoken out before, taking a position against abortion in a letter published in a newspaper. His pastor is not surprised to see him take a stance on something that affects his family.

"When he talks about an issue, he has studied it thoroughly," Hemphill said.

Parents and teachers who dismiss views opposing evolution are practicing their own form of religion, Taylor said. He insists intelligent design is not a faith-based approach.

"The supporters of evolution have an agenda as well. Their agenda is to keep God out, even if the evidence points to God. . . . It's faith. Those people are as fervent in their beliefs as Christians are in believing God created Earth."


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: aclu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-275 next last
To: Aric2000
OK, so the theory of gravity, is faith based then as well? Or the theory of calculus, mathematics, etc, all scientific findings are called theories.

No, because calculus, mathematics, gravity, chemical properties, magnetism, electricity, etc. etc. can all be tested over and over again with definite results. Evolution is closer to astrology, where a scientist finds a bone in the ground and makes gigantic inferences and extrapolations based on that infinitesmal finding.
41 posted on 09/08/2002 11:28:37 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
THe working definition of an athiest is someone who does not believe in the existence god.

QED, I am NOT an atheist. Just because I do not believe in your religious mythology does not mean that I am an atheist, just because I want my children learning their religious beliefs from me, does not make me an atheist, just because I do not wish my children to learn about your myths and religion, does not mean that I am an atheist.

It does make you a bit of an extremist though, and perhaps a cultist would be a good definition for you.

A cult.

1 : formal religious veneration : WORSHIP
2 : a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents

You seem to fit that definition quite well.
42 posted on 09/08/2002 11:28:49 AM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Typical trick: WHen you don't like what someone says, call them a liberal.
43 posted on 09/08/2002 11:29:13 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
Where did I say that I hate god, that was an awfully far reaching assumption.

I do not want creationism taught in public school. It is not the public schools place to teach religious mythology. It is your job as a parent to teach that, if that is what you want your children to believe, NOT THE GOVERNMENTS!!
44 posted on 09/08/2002 11:31:07 AM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
I see, maybe you would be happier in a country like Saudi Arabia or Iran.

Since I am talking about your opposition to Christian teaching, it looks like you have more in common with those folks. Your fanaticism approaches the Iranian mullahs.

45 posted on 09/08/2002 11:32:45 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Sorry, when you start talking about a religious theocracy in this country, you are being the treasonous one.

It is you who are attempting to impose a secular religious theocracy in this country. I am talking about terminating the government provision of education, and totally privatizing it. Where is there any theocracy in that? It looks like you have been smoking some good dope!

46 posted on 09/08/2002 11:35:32 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000

OK, so the theory of gravity, is faith based then as well?

Hmmm... I always thought it was the law of gravity. And every morning, when I get out of bed and my feet naturally go to the floor, I believe it, no matter how badly I wish I could fly.


47 posted on 09/08/2002 11:38:57 AM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
You seem to fit that definition quite well

As it happens, since you hate both God and most of his creatures, you seem to fit the definition of an enemy of the human race. In this way, you are an ally of Osama binLaden. This country knows how to deal with enemies of the human race.

48 posted on 09/08/2002 11:39:05 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
I do not want creationism taught in public school.

I do not support it either. NOTHING should be taught in public school.

49 posted on 09/08/2002 11:40:33 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
There is nothing wrong with teaching that there are other theories, if the theories are given a proportionate amount of time (for creationism, maybe 10 minutes and one page in a textbook?). Nothing wrong with it at all, if it is neutral and not an endorsement of creationism.

My own textbooks in high school mentioned primitive and alternate theories. There wasn't much to right because the theories themselves contained no math or quantitative findings.

If that makes you so scared, then you've got deeper issues than devotion ot the purity of science.
50 posted on 09/08/2002 11:56:08 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I just don't want relirious beliefs taught in school, I have no problem with you teaching yoru children whatever religion you care to have them believe. Where that makes me some kind of religious dictator is beyond me. Your logic is not logic at all.

You do not agree with what I say, but have no way to refute it, therefore you call me names.

That is a liberal tactic, are you therefore a liberal? I thought not, but your arguments are getting to the point of fanatascism, which is sad, very sad.

You don't like public school, neither do I, we agree on that, but as long as we have them, they had better not be teaching religious mythology. That is your job as a parent to teach that to your kids, not the governments.
51 posted on 09/08/2002 11:57:23 AM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Gotta weigh in on this.

1) No matter how you cut it, something cannot come out of nothing. The evolutionists who claim that there was nothing there, and then suddenly there was, are either a few blades short of a propellor or insane. The thing that was made cannot be a part of its own making. It is logically impossible.

2) The whole evolution research (if you'll permit a horselaugh at this point) is working backwards, kind of like detectives trying to find out how someone was murdered. Problem is, there is so much sloppiness on dates, how long something might take, and whatnot, that exactness is impossible. Moreover, evolution cannot stand up to the scientific method because it is *not* repeatable.

3) Any attempt that Arric2000 might say about diversity within the scientific community is a fraud. There are a lot of theories out there from well-esablished people who are shunned because the theories don't fit the norm. One guy, for example, makes a great case for the core of the earth being a nuclear pile about 5-8 miles in diameter, but the *new* textbook on earth science I've seen ignores this fact, even though the theories been around for years. Open minds? Don't hold your breath, pal.

In a book "Bones of Contention," it is stated (and not disproved by anyone I've read critiquing it) that the skulls, etc., that the scientists "study" are actually resin casts of the original. The bone evidence is scant, and when set against other evidence, shows that any kind of "evolution" was not progressive, and that there were different kinds of alleged ancestors living in the same locale at the same time. Yet we're supposed to sit back and let our kids be subjected to such unscientific drivel? I think not.

The public schools need to expose kids to both sides of the issue. There are too many holes in the theory of evolution to present it as a law (like the law of gravity, which is repeatable) or a fact (like chickens lay eggs). Who knows? Maybe our kids might come out of schools actually able to look at an issue and think about it.

One more thing. Given the millions of steps for evolution to occur, I submit this Triple Dog Dare to Arrac2000 (or whatever the name is) and to other proponents of evolution: Get a tupperware bowl and lid, or a butter tub, or something with a lid. Take apart a Lego minifig (head, torso, legs)and put pieces in bowl. Cover with lid and shake. Check every 5 seconds. Let me know when the parts come together to "evolve" into a fully-made, fully-functional minifig. I won't hold my breath.

52 posted on 09/08/2002 12:02:00 PM PDT by Othniel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: Aric2000
And perhaps abortion as well? Strict adherence to the shibboleths of evolution undergirds an atheistic/materialist point of view, making the surgical extermination of fetal life more tenable. An as a matter of fact, none of the medical advances you describe were necessarily derived from an evolutionary model as you seem to imply. Regards
54 posted on 09/08/2002 12:05:50 PM PDT by diode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Do you believe that public schools should teach from the perspective that God's existence is a truth?
55 posted on 09/08/2002 12:07:04 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
At least you admit that your belief in God is based on counting noses rather than faith and logic isn't important.
56 posted on 09/08/2002 12:07:38 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
As it happens, since you hate both God and most of his creatures,

Geez, you fanatics really reach, and I mean WAY out there.

I do not hate god, I do not hate christianity either. if you wish to teach your children christianity, then please, BE MY GUEST, BUT, as long as there is public school, religion should not be taught in science class. PERIOD!!

Creationism is religion, evolution is science, no matter how many times you repeat the lie that evolution has no scientific basis, does NOT make it true. That is again, a Clintonesque trick. Lie and lie and lie, and pretty soon people will believe it is the truth.

If you want your kids taught creationism in school, then send them to private school. End of story.

If you want your children to get a faith based education, then send them to private school, if they have to go to public school because you can't afford it, then maybe you ought to teach it to them at home. It is a parents responsiblity to teach religion, NOT the governments.

I should know better then to debate with a bunch of religious fanatics. You twist my arguments because I am not a creationist, but we actually agree that the government has no place in school, although putting public teachers to death is a little extreme, is it not?

THe government has no place in my childrens education, that is why I homeschool, but I am not a christian, so that makes me satan carnate, even though we agree on the basic issue of government schools, there shouldn't be any. BUT, as long as there are, and as long as we do have government financed and government run schools, creationism and other religious beliefs have no place there.
57 posted on 09/08/2002 12:08:39 PM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
And perhaps abortion as well? Strict adherence to the shibboleths of evolution undergirds an atheistic/materialist point of view, making the surgical extermination of fetal life more tenable. An as a matter of fact, none of the medical advances you describe were necessarily derived from an evolutionary model as you seem to imply. Regards
58 posted on 09/08/2002 12:08:52 PM PDT by diode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"Well, he doesn't sound terribly religious -- but he wants to cloak himself in his faith so that his opponents cannot attack him. And since when is scepticism about evolution inherently Christian? Has he read his holy book? I believe the Jewish faith mentions Adam and Eve and the creation of the world by God. If he is a Jew, why doesn't he believe?"

Since you've read the Bible, you also know, the Jewish people have always had a problem with obedience. Sure they're supposed to believe in creation but like ancient times, they abandon God's Word for vain philosophy.

59 posted on 09/08/2002 12:18:14 PM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JCG
He can't help how he looks but he can help his simpleness. He happily wallows in ignorance and acts out when threatened. Proverbs has a lot to say about the "simple".
60 posted on 09/08/2002 12:20:58 PM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-275 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson