Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: dubyagee
Couldn't those genetics consequences also be said to 'back' creation, in that the codes are written to support life. Wouldn't they need to be 'written' by an Intelligence? How is that more difficult to believe than 'accidental' order?

Evolution--at least as regards the higher organisms--requires the tree structure exhibited by genetic cladograms. Had it been otherwise, evolution would have been falsified. Any old structure would have been compatible with special creation, so no particular structure can be said to lend support to the idea.

288 posted on 08/28/2002 2:56:29 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
Evolution--at least as regards the higher organisms--requires the tree structure exhibited by genetic cladograms. Had it been otherwise, evolution would have been falsified. Any old structure would have been compatible with special creation, so no particular structure can be said to lend support to the idea.

You're above my head here, but let me see if I am correct in what you're saying.

Are you saying that genetics shows that everything has progressed over time? That everything shows evidence of having gradually aged? Butcouldn't it have been created that way? According to the Bible, Adam was a man, not a baby, at creation.

Hope I'm not too far off base on what you're saying.

293 posted on 08/28/2002 3:07:48 PM PDT by dubyagee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson