[Freedom2specul8]

There are also a whole crew of freepers who watched the trial live, read the transcripts and debated with those who believe the jury arrived at the correct decision. Pretty soon you will discover who is willing to debate or discuss and who would rather fight with you over your opinion.

If Dusek "lied" to the jury, and the judge allowed it and feldman ignored it, what does that tell ya?

The evidence was not fabricated as some would leave you to believe. There is NO evidence that westerfield was set up, no evidence the child porn was planted, no evidence the parents did it..none. There is plenty of evidence against dw, and now that we know he put his fingers in the mouth of his 7 yr old niece who he thought was asleep, I'd say that was bit perverted.

[Doc Savage]

Still FR's Pompous Twit, eh?

The point is that the prosecution did not PROVE DW's guilt beyond a REASONABLE doubt. He may very well be guilty, but the burden of proof was on the prosecution, and they failed miserably.

Your reprehensible behavior on these threads over the past several months, and your obnoxious arrogance in the face of reasoned opinion has marked you forever more as someone not to be trusted or listened to. As for your condescending note to FresnoDA at the beginning of this thread, you were never considered a leader of the discussion. You were, however, earmarked as a garrulous, obstructive, and demeaning interloper. Enjoy your hollow victory and potential execution. Both seem quite apropos.

Doc Savage

[CyberAnt]

Thanks for the post Kim - I'm not about to argue with people who have no facts to argue on. Besides, if you read any of their messages to me, once they called me names, the debate was over (at least for me). Name calling just shows their ignorance.