Replies

I don't know how to comfort you. You've been in denial about this case for a long time. You are blinded and mistaken in your perceptions of the testimony and the public demeanor of the parents.

As to parental carelessness, well hindsight is 20/20. The world is full of crime victims who regret their false sense of security. Dulled senses and judgement due to partying is plausable. How come you never give the benefit of the reasonable doubt to the parents, just save it all for the man who has child porn on his computers and has a neice who complained to her mother about him "bothering" her.

You are blinded and mistaken in your perceptions of the testimony and the public demeanor of the parents.

I have watched the PH trial. I have read the transcripts. I read the news articles. I watched the TRIAL.

I can tell when someone is lying. Body language is very telling. Voice pitch changes are also.

Let me ask you this. Are you in denial about the Friends at the Van Dam's? THey all told different stories. Someone or several are lying.

In court, Prosecution witnesses stated UNDER OATH, that police didn't copy their statements down correctly.

Police admitted they lied to obtain the warrant to search DW's.

I see a situation where evidence tracking proves that Danielle had been in the MH at one time, but not when.

I see evidence that proves she had not been in the MH for approx. one year, that DW had never been in the VD home.

I see child murderers and rapists running rampant in SD. Samantha Runnion. I suppose DW did that while he was in jail. I see arrests at the same time that DANIELLE's body most likely was placed at Dehesa Rd, for an INTERNATIONAL PORN RING, with members being part of the SDPD. How many people, on losing their child, are more worried about their bust size? Why was Brenda so willing to go on TV and help Jahi Turner's mother, when it first started, then when the stepfather failed the LIE DETECTOR test, BRENDA did an about face?

I have not discounted any valid evidence.

Listen, Val, it could be that the VD's were careless, and because of that someone snatched their daughter. It could be that they are sincere and would do anything to NOT have lost her, or get her back. The fact that this is not what they have said or done, is why I feel the way I do.

I gave the Vd's the benefit of reasonable doubt at the start, and they totally blew it. Over and over again.

Maybe they are just irresponsible non-monagomous druggies and lied/covered up to try and hide that. Maybe DW is a magician and he got Danielle, without his trace in her house or room, and without her trace in his SUV or MH. Maybe he sexually assaulted her and killed her without leaving traces of that. Maybe he bleached the MH and got rid of the evidence , except for 1 print, 1 hair, 1 spot, and 1 spot on the jacket. Maybe he drove all over southern california with her alive in the back of his MH and went to public places, and no one noticed her, neither did he worry that someone might enter the MH and find her.

Maybe......

The last thing Feldman asked this girl is:

"Do you really remember all this or are you saying it because this is what is written down?"
Her Answer:
"I am just saying it because that is what is written down."

I am probably late in posting on this, but her admission to that tells me a lot.