I know that you've already received a fair amount of grief over your #11 comments especially, but in deciding whether or not it's "worth it" to go after these criminals and make every effort to expose their crimes at every opportunity, consider:
These grifters have posted this piece of garbage on our taxpayer-funded WH computer servers. So what we have here is the use of government office and equipment in the commission and furtherance of serious felonies, up to and possibly including theft of office through usurpation despite ineligibility.
At a minimum, we the citizenry should be able to have some degree of certainty as to whether or not 20th Amendment Section 3 has been satisfied, and if so, how and verified by whom, and with access to any proofs offered. Right is right; the constitution and the Rule of Law matter, else all else is moot.
Your own tagline is instructive:
"Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for."
Thanks for the Ping, Nully.
I have no problem with people who want to pursue the eligibility issue. Why would I? I believe in liberty. What bothered me wasn’t the pursuit of the eligibility issue. It was the bashing of good conservatives, like Mark Levin and Michelle Malkin, simply because they didn’t see elegibility as the #1 concern.
Some of the Truther stuff borders on the absurd. Other information seems promising. I’d actually like to see the SCOTUS rule on eligibility and give us a solid definition of “natural born citizen.”
I don’t feel much need to argue with anybody about the state of our country anymore. IMO by April 14, 2014 all but about 20% will be ready to march on D.C. with torches and pitchforks.