Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

This is laughable. No reputable historian thinks there is any equivalence between the behaviors of the two opposing sides. You are really reaching here. Chambersburg was so memorable because it was an ANOMALY, the exception that proved the rule.


81 posted on 04/11/2012 7:08:31 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: central_va; rockrr; Ditto
central_va: "Chambersburg was so memorable because it was an ANOMALY, the exception that proved the rule."

In fact, the experience of Pennsylvania at Chambersburg and other towns was typical of every state which bordered the Confederacy.

From the beginning of the war, the Confederacy sent troops into every bordering state -- Maryland, Pennsylvania, Western Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, Oklahoma, New Mexico and even distant states like Kansas and Colorado.

In every case, Confederate forces lived off the land and took what they needed from local populations.

My point are:
  1. The Confederacy invaded, destroyed and stole property from every state or territory adjoining it, and some further removed.

  2. Both Union and Confederate armies sometimes left trails of pillage and destruction in their wakes.

  3. Sure, by standards of other wars, civilian losses were relatively small and insignificant.

  4. But it is simply not true to claim that one side was guilty and the other entirely innocent.

They both did it.

85 posted on 04/12/2012 5:22:38 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson