Posted on 01/26/2011 5:57:29 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
Tim Adams |
More reactionary diatribes at Reaganite Republican
To: bayliving
It means the Bambi campaign admits that he held dual citizenship for part of his life. Some legal people believe that such individuals are ineligible for the presidency for the same reason that those who are not natural-born citizens are ineligible: they have or have had loyalty to a country other than the U.S.
5 posted on Monday, September 29, 2008 9:39:32 AM by freespirited
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2093068/posts
To: cookcounty
For everyone running for POTUS - not just Obama and McCain - original birth certificates and parents’ citizenship status should be released to the public.
In Obama’s case there are several questions, in McCain’s there is the question of him born in a foreign country. Considering some of the controversial interpretations made by the Supreme Court, it might decide against McCain.
There is no question if both parents of a candidate are citizens AND he is born in the United States. If not, then it needs clarification. I would not want a POTUS who holds dual citizenship.
50 posted on Saturday, July 19, 2008 12:20:53 PM by Dante3
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2047869/posts
Posted on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:25:31 PM by Neville72
We already know that Obama is not QUALIFIED to be the President, we now know that he is not ELIGIBLE to be President under American law.
This is a great comment to a post over at Michelle Malkins blog:
On June 10th, 2008 at 8:37 am, legendx3 said:
Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16. Barack Obamas father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obamas mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawaii being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obamas birth, but *after* age 16. It doesnt matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obamas birth when she was 18 in Hawaii. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obamas birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aformentioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Cizen parent. Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.
*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. *** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. Citzen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obamas aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. Election law. I think the Gov. Of California would be very insterested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. Citizen, and it would set precedence. Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking through over the next several days
DAWG! This guy really is about flaunting his illegal behavior in all of our faces, isnt he?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2029794/posts
I agree with you......Curosity is trying to muddy the waters because he knows his dream lover is ineligible in so many ways.
Freepers were trying to figure out if what the Obama team was dishing out to the public was actually a fact. His bogus Colb.....Where Obama was born, who his father really was. People knew Obama was a faud. There are hundreds of examples like these:
[Cookcounty talking about McCain]
“But BOTH of his parents were US citizens, unlike Obama.”-Cookcounty
“For everyone running for POTUS - not just Obama and McCain - original birth certificates and parents’ citizenship status should be released to the public.
In Obama’s case there are several questions, in McCain’s there is the question of him born in a foreign country. Considering some of the controversial interpretations made by the Supreme Court, it might decide against McCain.
There is no question if both parents of a candidate are citizens AND he is born in the United States. If not, then it needs clarification. I would not want a POTUS who holds dual citizenship.”
50 posted on Saturday, July 19, 2008 10:20:53 AM by Dante3
To: Always Right
http://www.blufftontoday.com/node/21633#comment-113653";
Wow, could this be true?
Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents
Dont know if I can post all of it but it is interesting reading.
18 posted on Monday, June 09, 2008 8:09:55 PM by angelsonmyside (It’s not the color of one’s skin but the color of the heart)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2028597/posts
To: RockinRight
It can get complicated, but if the parents are citizens, their children are automatically citizens, no matter where they are born.
50 posted on Thursday, February 03, 2005 1:50:52 PM by HairOfTheDog (It is no bad thing to celebrate a simple life!)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1335211/posts?q=1&;page=1
Skip to comments.
You can forget the Birth Certificate - OBAMA ADMITS BRITISH CITIZEN AT BIRTH
Natural Born Citizen ^ | November 15, 2008 | Leo Donofrio
Posted on Monday, November 17, 2008 10:23:32 AM by Amityschild
Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be President. Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth”, just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President.
The Framers of the Constitution, at the time of their birth, were also British Citizens and that’s why the Framers declared that, while they were Citizens of the United States, they themselves were not “natural born Citizens”. Hence their inclusion of the grandfather clause in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution:
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President;
That’s it right there. (Emphasis added.)
The Framers wanted to make themselves eligible to be President, but they didn’t want future generations to be Governed by a Commander In Chief who had split loyalty to another Country. The Framers were comfortable making an exception for themselves. They did, after all, create the Constitution. But they were not comfortable with the possibility of future generations of Presidents being born under the jurisdiction of Foreign Powers, especially Great Britain and its monarchy, who the Framers and Colonists fought so hard in the American Revolution to be free of.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2133568/posts
Oh man!!! Lol that’s PRICELESS! Oh how I wish my Dad could have seen this!!! He would have busted up!!
Thank you!
Ping to post.
Ping to post
Yowza! I mean, ‘BOWza’!
Wow, have can you stand discussing with this FINO, the professed total fifth column idiot???
Now, now...that's an insult to cut outs every where. At least cut outs have a modicum of personality.
Simple: BOTH. Alternative: total Idiot!!!
Glomarization?
You must have tuned in late. The issue had been raised before Obama was elected. The MSM was still braying about tingling legs.
Sure describes Obama well.
“I wish so badly I could see that youtube video. I wonder if the audio of that is posted someplace. My computer is OK to hear just audio.”
I wish the whole country could see and hear it:
Hear Ex-KGB Uri Bezmenov when he says “we” — the agents of ideological/psychological warfare — “couldn’t BELIEVE how successful we were!”
He said this in 1985... 25 years ago!
The KGB and the brain washing of the West:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytc9mApHMIs&feature=related
He also said that “the clock is ticking” and “it only takes one generation to subvert a country.”
That was 25 years years ago!
That so many brainwashed youth drank the Kool-Aid and voted for this impostor(Bammy)speaks volumes.
STE=Q
Curiosity is an afterbirther troll. Delusionally he/she believes no one mentioned eligibility questions till after the elections. Granted he wasn’t present for the ‘discussions’ I had with my mother-inlaw...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.