OBAMA'S BORDER TROUBLES (The "Death Blow" to Obama's COLB fraud)

TheDrRJP Channel ^ | 07/31/2010 | Dr. Ron Polland

[Polarik]

OBAMA'S BORDER TROUBLES (The "Death Blow" to Obama's COLB fraud)

Play that "funky border," white boy... Ever wonder how or why that UGLY, GRAYISH-GREEN BORDER wound up on Obama's 2007 COLB? I mean, besides it being a forgery. Well, wonder no longer. After two years of research and testing - and a few thousand combinations of multiple image parameters - here are the answers to HOW and WHY this BOMBASTIC BORDER was made.

Believe it or not, even a few, staunch Obama supporters found the border to be "Fishy," "Suspicious," "Unrealistic," and "Something a decent Forger would never do."

On the contrary, the Forger who made this Border was both decent and devilishly clever. He or she fabricated a border unlike any other, and unable to be discerned or duplicated by anyone. Until now, that is. As you will see from my latest video, It took a lot of time to do the crime (of document fraud). Like the three other instructional videos on my channel, I have assembled a set of step-by-step instructions on how to recreate this border. As you perform the rather complex process of replicating the border, or just watching the steps unfold, it should be self-evident that this border could only have been made by a human, and not a scanner. Obama's Border Troubles is the fourth and final installment in the set of instructional videos that I have provided for accurately recreating the Obama COLB forgery.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxd0kQla3FA

http://www.youtube.com/TheDrRJP

 

 

 

[Danae]

No we aren't Ron. You are lying through your teeth.
Here is ALL of the emails I sent back and forth to Ron. These were through Gmail. He has a Yahoo address. As anyone can see, this is is reverse chronological order, the first emails coming at the end of this post. The last emails are at the top.
You DO owe me an apology Ron, I REPEATEDLY tried to contact you even AFTER you freakin burned me. I talked to Phil Berg personally about you. He contacted me through Facebook after I asked him about you.
I owned up to my mistake right here on Free Republic, and YOU were in the "TO:" box. I owned up to MY mistake, YOU NEVER HAVE. At the very minimum EVERYONE can now see what you REALLY are.
A LIAR.

________________________________________ I spoke to PJB
Reply
|
Lady Di ✆
to Polarik
show details 8/3/09
from Lady Di
sender-time
Sent at 5:47 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:28 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:47 PM
subject I spoke to PJB
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 8/3/09
Ron, I spoke to Phil Berg today.
He is vouching for you with out telling me anything about you.
I don't know whats going on, but if I can help, let me know.
Dianna
Facebook ✆
to me
show details 8/3/09
Philip sent you a message.
--------------------
Re: Ron Polarik
Dianna:
Call me - my private line (610) xxx-xxxx and we will talk.
Phil
--------------------
To reply to this message, follow the link below:
___ This message was intended for Lady Di Want to control which emails you receive from Facebook? Go to:
Facebook's offices are located at 1601 S. California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304
COLB images
Reply

Lady Di ✆
to polarik
show details 7/28/09
from Lady Di
sender-time
Sent at 11:20 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:28 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:20 PM
subject COLB images
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/28/09
Ron,
would you are least do me the service of letting me know you received the images I sent you.
[He never did] Thank you
Dianna
Rescanned images
Reply
|

Lady Di ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
from Lady Di
sender-time
Sent at 6:37 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:28 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:37 PM
subject Rescanned images
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/27/09
You owe me a REAL big apology!! I have told nothing but the truth. What do I have to gain, other than you knowing all my personal information, for telling anything BUT the truth???
I am just sick to my stomach that you would do this to me, particularly as I was doing this to help you out of sheer goodness, good will, and a sincere well meaning effort to help you. Every damn word I have told you about this is the truth.
[I was completely wrong, and would admit it later on FR]
HP Scanner settings:
Brightness -302 (thats a MINUS sign)
Contrast 667

There is a front, a back scanned image and a close up of the seal, from a distance then closer in yet. and a close up of the seal from the BACK SIDE.
You really should have sent me a reminder to do this you know.
Dianna

6 attachments — Oops... the virus scanner has a problem right now. Download at your own risk, or try again later. View all images
Polarik1A 001.jpg
2990K View Download
Polarik1B.jpg
1839K View Download
Polarik1CSeal.jpg
409K View Download
Polarik1CSeal2.jpg
113K View Download
Polarik1dBackStamp.jpg
230K View Download
Polarik1dBackStampandseal.jpg
323K View Download

One more
Reply
|

LadyDi ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
from LadyDi
sender-time
Sent at 6:02 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:29 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:02 PM
subject One more
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/27/09

Dianna
Oops... the virus scanner has a problem right now. Download at your own risk, or try again later.

photo.jpg
134K View Download

One more.
Reply
|

LadyDi ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
from LadyDi
sender-time
Sent at 5:57 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:29 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:57 PM
subject One more.
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/27/09


Dianna
Oops... the virus scanner has a problem right now. Download at your own risk, or try again later.

photo.jpg
134K View Download

« Back to Search Results
Archive
Report spam
Delete
Move to Inbox
Labels
More actions
‹ Newer 7 of 16 Older ›
More yet
Reply
|

LadyDi ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
from LadyDi
sender-time
Sent at 5:36 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:30 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:36 PM
subject More yet
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/27/09


Dianna
photo.jpg
113K

And more
Reply
|

LadyDi ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
from LadyDi
sender-time Sent at 5:34 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:30 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM
subject And more
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/27/09


Dianna
photo.jpg
130K View Downlo

More
Reply
|

LadyDi ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
from LadyDi
sender-time Sent at 5:33 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:30 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:33 PM
subject More
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/27/09


Dianna


photo.jpg
116K View Download


.....photos
Reply
|

LadyDi ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
from LadyDi
sender-time Sent at 5:33 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:31 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:33 PM
subject .....photos
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/27/09



Dianna
photo.jpg
90K View Download

Now I am pissed.
Reply
|

LadyDi ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/27/09
Dianna


Dianna
photo.jpg
113K View Download

A quick question on your COLB
Inbox
X
Reply
|


Polarik
to me
show details 7/15/09
from Polarik
to Lady Di
date Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:23 AM
subject A quick question on your COLB
mailed-by yahoo.com
signed-by yahoo.com
hide details 7/15/09
Hi, Lady Di:
How was this COLB folded, and for how long did it stay folded?
Looking forward to the second set of scans.
Thanks again,
Ron
Reply Forward

Reply
|


Lady Di ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/15/09
from Lady Di
sender-time Sent at 12:48 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:32 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:48 PM
subject Re: A quick question on your COLB
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/15/09
Its been folded the two way (letter form) since it was printed in 2000. I then folded that in half , meaning I cut the width of that folded letter in half as you can see. It stayed that way for a few weeks as I needed to carry it with me, it was my only proof of identity for some time. It took a while to rebuild everything. Since that time it has been folded in standard letter form and kept either in a file folder or a drawer.
Mostly out of the light. The paper it is on is not particularly dark, its always been sort of light. I will send a new set this afternoon!
D.
- Show quoted text -


On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Polarik wrote:
Hi, Lady Di:
How was this COLB folded, and for how long did it stay folded?
Looking forward to the second set of scans.
Thanks again,
Ron
Reply Forward
Reply
|

Polarik
to me
show details 7/15/09
from Polarik
to Lady Di
date Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM
subject Re: A quick question on your COLB
mailed-by yahoo.com
signed-by yahoo.com


hide details 7/15/09
Thanks, Lady Di.
Ron

--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Lady Di wrote:
From: Lady Di
Subject: Re: A quick question on your COLB
To: "Polarik"
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 7:48 PM
- Show quoted text -

Its been folded the two way (letter form) since it was printed in 2000. I then folded that in half , meaning I cut the width of that folded letter in half as you can see. It stayed that way for a few weeks as I needed to carry it with me, it was my only proof of identity for some time. It took a while to rebuild everything. Since that time it has been folded in standard letter form and kept either in a file folder or a drawer.
Mostly out of the light. The paper it is on is not particularly dark, its always been sort of light. I will send a new set this afternoon!
D.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Polarik wrote:
Hi, Lady Di:
How was this COLB folded, and for how long did it stay folded?
Looking forward to the second set of scans.
Thanks again,
Ron


Re: Your COLB
Inbox
X
Reply
|

Polarik
to me
show details 7/14/09
from Polarik
to Lady Di
date Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:54 PM
subject Re: Your COLB
mailed-by yahoo.com
signed-by yahoo.com

hide details 7/14/09
Lady Di:
Thanks so much for sending me these.
Boy, I wish I had known last year that you had this. It's a 2007 COLB, and I was scouring the countryside looking for another one like it.
I've attached a copy of the only 2007 COLB I had prior to getting yours.
Now, what I'd really would appreciate is if you can make me another set of scans, but this time, with higher output levels, sort of like the one I attached.
The first set is a bit underexposed to make out all the detail.
If you are using the the HP software (PrecisionScan Pro, I think it's called), or even just the driver, I believe that there is a setting for output level or exposure control on the output menu.
I used to use an HP6250cxi and I recall that either a Settings or Options selection is on the top menu. I stopped using it because the software does not run under Vista. Seeing your COLB is like really great news and not so great news.
It's really great news because it's a real 2007 COLB made during the same year that Obama's bogus COLB was allegedly made.
It's not so good news because it confirmed one of my fears -- that the DOH used both the larger and smaller Seal designs in the same year. If you ever saw that Seal comparison made by PhilDragoo, then you'll know what I mean.
I went out on a limb last year by stating that the DOH only used the larger Seal, and when I saw the smaller Seal in the Factcheck photos, I thought that was a red flag. It's a false alarm, but no matter because the object that Factcheck photographed is a fabricated document.
Thanks ever so much,
Ron

--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Lady Di wrote:
From: Lady Di
Subject: PolarikCOLB
To: Polarik
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 12:41 AM
- Show quoted text -

Hey Pol,
Here is the COLB, both sides. They were scanned by me just now with an HP C4200 Printer Scanner on Custom Settings of 600 DPI all other color settings at default.
Again I wish to stress that I do not want to see my personal information on the internet. The reason I am sending this to you is because the Department of Heath in Hawaii just confirmed to me by phone that this document was indeed requested in Feb of 2000, they have a computer record of it. and it shows that my Mom requested it. If MY colb could have a MISTAKEN date like this, because its supposed to be for the date of the PRINTING, then it is conceivable that it could be changed to ANY date the person printing out could want.
I hope this helps.
Dianna

DAN0016.jpg
979K View Download
Reply Forward
Reply


Lady Di ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/14/09
from Lady Di
sender-time Sent at 8:09 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:32 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:09 PM
subject Re: Your COLB
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/14/09
Hey Ron,

You have to understand something about this COLB. Its NOT a 2007. Its a 2000 with an incorrect date on it!
[I was wrong on this, and admitted it in public on FR and pinged Polarik to the post. I ADMITTED I was wrong on this]
Yea seriously. I checked with The Dept of Health and confirmed with the lady on the phone, Gina, that indeed my copy was ordered in 2000, Feb actually. Which is the month my husband and I moved from Texas to San Diego and I got my wallet stolen on the trip. That was a horrible move. Anyway, its a 2000 copy with an incorrect date, and that incorrect date might just set precedence for HDH incorrectly dating materials, because you have a scanned one right in in front of ya!
Thats what makes this COLB interesting. Other than me of course LOL
And we all know I am insignificant lol
Anyway, seriously, I hope this helps you! But I have to be very very clear, this document was printed in 2000!
Regards and salutes to a fellow FReeper!
Dianna
- Show quoted text –

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Polarik wrote:
Lady Di:
Thanks so much for sending me these.
Boy, I wish I had known last year that you had this. It's a 2007 COLB, and I was scouring the countryside looking for another one like it.
I've attached a copy of the only 2007 COLB I had prior to getting yours.
Now, what I'd really would appreciate is if you can make me another set of scans, but this time, with higher output levels, sort of like the one I attached.
The first set is a bit underexposed to make out all the detail.
If you are using the the HP software (PrecisionScan Pro, I think it's called), or even just the driver, I believe that there is a setting for output level or exposure control on the output menu.
I used to use an HP6250cxi and I recall that either a Settings or Options selection is on the top menu. I stopped using it because the software does not run under Vista. Seeing your COLB is like really great news and not so great news.
It's really great news because it's a real 2007 COLB made during the same year that Obama's bogus COLB was allegedly made.
It's not so good news because it confirmed one of my fears -- that the DOH used both the larger and smaller Seal designs in the same year. If you ever saw that Seal comparison made by PhilDragoo, then you'll know what I mean.
I went out on a limb last year by stating that the DOH only used the larger Seal, and when I saw the smaller Seal in the Factcheck photos, I thought that was a red flag. It's a false alarm, but no matter because the object that Factcheck photographed is a fabricated document.
Thanks ever so much,

Ron


--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Lady Di wrote:
From: Lady Di
Subject: PolarikCOLB
To: Polarik
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 12:41 AM
Hey Pol,
Here is the COLB, both sides. They were scanned by me just now with an HP C4200 Printer Scanner on Custom Settings of 600 DPI all other color settings at default.
Again I wish to stress that I do not want to see my personal information on the internet. The reason I am sending this to you is because the Department of Heath in Hawaii just confirmed to me by phone that this document was indeed requested in Feb of 2000, they have a computer record of it. and it shows that my Mom requested it. If MY colb could have a MISTAKEN date like this, because its supposed to be for the date of the PRINTING, then it is conceivable that it could be changed to ANY date the person printing out could want.
I hope this helps.
Dianna
Reply Forward
Reply
|

Polarik
to me
show details 7/15/09
from Polarik
to Lady Di
date Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:56 AM
subject Re: Your COLB
mailed-by yahoo.com

hide details 7/15/09
OK. I believe you.
Can I get another set made with more exposure?
Thanks,
Ron
--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Lady Di wrote:
From: Lady Di
Subject: Re: Your COLB
To: "Polarik"
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 3:09 AM
- Show quoted text -
Hey Ron,
You have to understand something about this COLB. Its NOT a 2007. Its a 2000 with an incorrect date on it!
Yea seriously. I checked with The Dept of Health and confirmed with the lady on the phone, Gina, that indeed my copy was ordered in 2000, Feb actually. Which is the month my husband and I moved from Texas to San Diego and I got my wallet stolen on the trip. That was a horrible move. Anyway, its a 2000 copy with an incorrect date, and that incorrect date might just set precedence for HDH incorrectly dating materials, because you have a scanned one right in in front of ya!
Thats what makes this COLB interesting. Other than me of course LOL
And we all know I am insignificant lol
Anyway, seriously, I hope this helps you! But I have to be very very clear, this document was printed in 2000!
Regards and salutes to a fellow FReeper!
Dianna
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Polarik wrote:
Lady Di:
Thanks so much for sending me these.
Boy, I wish I had known last year that you had this. It's a 2007 COLB, and I was scouring the countryside looking for another one like it.
I've attached a copy of the only 2007 COLB I had prior to getting yours.
Now, what I'd really would appreciate is if you can make me another set of scans, but this time, with higher output levels, sort of like the one I attached.
The first set is a bit underexposed to make out all the detail.
If you are using the the HP software (PrecisionScan Pro, I think it's called), or even just the driver, I believe that there is a setting for output level or exposure control on the output menu.
I used to use an HP6250cxi and I recall that either a Settings or Options selection is on the top menu. I stopped using it because the software does not run under Vista. Seeing your COLB is like really great news and not so great news.
It's really great news because it's a real 2007 COLB made during the same year that Obama's bogus COLB was allegedly made. It's not so good news because it confirmed one of my fears -- that the DOH used both the larger and smaller Seal designs in the same year. If you ever saw that Seal comparison made by PhilDragoo, then you'll know what I mean.
I went out on a limb last year by stating that the DOH only used the larger Seal, and when I saw the smaller Seal in the Factcheck photos, I thought that was a red flag. It's a false alarm, but no matter because the object that Factcheck photographed is a fabricated document.
Thanks ever so much,
Ron


--- On Wed, 7/15/09, Lady Di wrote:

From: Lady Di
Subject: PolarikCOLB
To: Polarik
Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 12:41 AM
Hey Pol,
Here is the COLB, both sides. They were scanned by me just now with an HP C4200 Printer Scanner on Custom Settings of 600 DPI all other color settings at default.
Again I wish to stress that I do not want to see my personal information on the internet. The reason I am sending this to you is because the Department of Heath in Hawaii just confirmed to me by phone that this document was indeed requested in Feb of 2000, they have a computer record of it. and it shows that my Mom requested it. If MY colb could have a MISTAKEN date like this, because its supposed to be for the date of the PRINTING, then it is conceivable that it could be changed to ANY date the person printing out could want.
I hope this helps.

Dianna
Reply Forward
Reply
|

Lady Di ✆
to Polarik
show details 7/15/09
from Lady Di
sender-time Sent at 12:45 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:32 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM
subject Re: Your COLB
mailed-by gmail.com

hide details 7/15/09
Sure, I just wanted to give you a default set at first. But yes I can do that after my Dr. Appointment this PM. :) PolarikCOLB
Reply
|

Lady Di ✆
to polarik
show details 7/14/09
from Lady Di
sender-time Sent at 5:41 PM (GMT-07:00). Current time there: 11:33 AM. ✆
to Polarik
date Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM
subject PolarikCOLB
mailed-by gmail.com
hide details 7/14/09
Hey Pol,
Here is the COLB, both sides. They were scanned by me just now with an HP C4200 Printer Scanner on Custom Settings of 600 DPI all other color settings at default.
Again I wish to stress that I do not want to see my personal information on the internet. The reason I am sending this to you is because the Department of Heath in Hawaii just confirmed to me by phone that this document was indeed requested in Feb of 2000, they have a computer record of it. and it shows that my Mom requested it. If MY colb could have a MISTAKEN date like this, because its supposed to be for the date of the PRINTING, then it is conceivable that it could be changed to ANY date the person printing out could want.
[remember I admitted I was wrong on this] I hope this helps.
Dianna
2 attachments — Download all attachments View all images
COLB1.jpg
2852K View Download

COLB2.jpg
1800K View Download

[Danae]

Ping to post.

[Danae]

I didn’t set you up you ****. I tried to HELP. Yougot the same images both times BECAUSE I ONLY HAD ONE DOCUMENT TO SCAN! You got different images BECAUSE YOU ASKED for different images with DIFFERENT resolutions!

Which I GAVE you. You NEVER even acknowledged I SENT them to you! Not until this asinine post of yours. THIS is the first time you even ADMITTED you got the NEW scans you asked for! The point being, YOU GOT WHAT YOU ASKED for.

I am suggesting that Admin Ban you. You are not fit for this board. It is YOU who are causing the problem.

[Danae]

Oh and Ron, I forgot,
1) you can’t prove ANYTHING is a forgery from a PICTURE of it. No one can.
2) You certainly can’t prove it of MINE because it happens to be REAL
3) you can’t own up to being COLOSSALLY wrong. Suck it up buttercup. You are 100% wrong. About me, about my COLB and about your “skills” in doing the impossible, which is to identify forgeries. No one can prove ANYTHING with a PICTURE of it.

You are nothing other than a charlatan and a fraud Ron.

Answer this. Why didn’t you respond to my apology last year? Hua? Why? Because you would have had to ADMIT you were wrong in your conclusions Ron. And you are 100% wrong.

[MestaMachine]

Geez, Di. PLEASE tell me he doessn’t have full images of your COLB.

[Danae]

Yes he does.

[Danae]

I made a mistake, and as soon as I knew what it was, I posted the proof of it. You see, the HDOH keeps records requests under the name of the requester. So when I called to figure out what was goingon with the date I had, the lady on the phone asked me who had ordered it. That person was my mom. At this time I didn’t know they kept records requests under the name of the person requesting them. But thats how they did it. So I gave my mom’s name, because thats who ordered it, and they confirmed that was the only request, and that it was in 2000. SO I asked her to check everything in my file regarding requests and send me receipts.

I got TWO receipts from HDOH. One under my moms name, one under mind, requested in APRIL of 2007. I had completely forgotten that I had ordered the second copy, it was just after I had knee surgery. I was still taking a lot of pain medications. I still don’t remember ordering it, but I DO remember why, I was planning a trip to Canada months later that year and needed my Passport. I could not go hunting through boxes in the garage to find anything, and so ordered a new one.

As soon as I realized my mistake, I posted it IMMEDIATELY and Posted pictures of BOTH receipts with my sincere apologies for the ROYAL screw up.

Apparently Ronnie here didn’t see that part. He was too busy trying to do something behind my bark with Jim Robinson, he was trying to set it up that I did it DELIBERATELY. Nothing of the sort is even REMOTELY true. I was acting in good faith and REMEMBERED things wrong. That led to the entire Cluster f***.

I ADMITTED what I did, and what I did wrong.

POLARIK is the one who made it into some psychotic out to get HIM BS story!

He was completely wrong, and when he KNEW he was wrong didn’t have the balls to own up and SAY SO. I have bigger stones than he does. But then I also didn’t have ANY MOTIVE for sending anything other than the honest to G-d truth as I knew it to be right at that time. I had NO MOTIVE at all other than to offer help, if indeed it WAS helpful.

I REGRET ever having tried to help that Ba****d.

He is out to keep the COLB as public as possible, when it is IRRELEVANT. It HIDES the truth of Obama’s REAL crime. It is just yet another crime Obama is guilty of. Its far from the biggest. The biggest is running for POTUS knowing he IS NOT and never could have been an Natural Born Citizen because he is British from birth. Selective Service Fraud, forgery, bribery, grafts, corruption the list goes on and on.

Is the fact Check document fake? The person who “discovered” that it is, was Polarik.

All you can prove off a PICTURE of a document is whether or not the PICTURE has been tampered with. Thats it. You can’t say anything about the document itself, and ANY forensic police officer, or investigator, anyone will tell you the same thing.

So yea, Polarik has my full COLB. If my information ever gets misused, I will know exactly who to go after. If it ever ends up in print, I will know who to go after.

Polarik is a charlatan.

[MestaMachine]

Don’t know who you are. Never posted to you in my life. But your name is mentioned on the above post. It would behoove you to weigh in here because you have been accused of something I doubt you were involved in.

[Danae]

Good LORD.

Polarik is insane. Thats all I can think of to say at this point. Simply insane.

I am seriously thinking about a restraining order now. This is Harassment.

I have never felt threatened by the internet, or by anyone here at FR until this very instant. And I DO feel threatened. This is NOT right. This is NOT RIGHT AT ALL.
I see that you sent me this in FRmail Mesta, I didn’t read it through until I saw it here on this thread.

This is WAY out of hand.

[MestaMachine]

I know what happened. Saved both full threads. Watched the whole thing until I couldn’t stand it anymore. I know you didn’t know about the backdoor setup. Maybe I should have told you then. I am sorry. Truth be told, I was a real newbie and was literally scared to death to challenge polarik. I was scared I would be banned. But I just could not stay quiet and watch that happen, so I finally did jump in, and a few people are still mad at me for it. That’s too bad.
But then I went off to find polarik and when I came back, someone else had already exposed him and he was gone. So I dropped it. Then he came back and started pinging me to every one of his posts and I couldn’t figure out why. Now I know that he was abusing someone else’s trust by using the ping list of someone else without permission.
Because that’s just the kind of a swell guy he is.

[Danae]

Well, for what its worth, thank you Mesta.

I am just simply flabbergasted at ALL of this. Its insanity.

[Hardraade]

They always had a strange relation with Kings

Lol. Sort of. When Norway became the current state, in 1814, the parliament made a choice between a Kingdom and a Republic. That is exactly parallel to what happened in America, only instead of going for a Republic they sent a delegation (after much deliberation) to Denmark to hire the best man they knew, and could get. That was Haakon 7, and he served extremely well as did his sons after him. Incidentally, in another parallel to the US, they needed a constitution and they solved that by adopting large parts of the US one.

Anyway, in 1940, while Blücher was sinking with all hands in the Oslo fjord, it became important to get the King and the government out of the country and over to London. The main reason for that was to get the legal government out of German hands so that the fleet - at the time the worlds largest merchant fleet - could continue operating internationally. They did pull that off. And I once met one of they guys who pulled it off.

I was on my way, by train, from Oslo to my home, and had the car parked at the train station. Well off the train I noticed an elderly gent pulling a suitcase that looked at least heavier than himself, if not bigger. There were no cabs around, so I asked him where he was going. Same place I was, it turned out. So we loaded his suitcase and off we went.

On the way I asked him where he was coming from. Turned out he was in from Tromsø, where he had attended a royal ceremony commemorating the transport to London. And that he was in the original contingent of soldiers escorting the King. Nowadays he lived in England, but usually made it home every 2-5 years or so.

So. We got to the driveway of his folks (just a hundred yards or so from my own), and as I made ready to lift his suitcase out of the trunk he grabbed my hand. Now, as it happened, I had a rather nasty thing on my right wrist. Didn't know what it was at the time, now I know that it was some diabetic ulcerous wound. It had been stuck on there for a couple of years, bothersome and irritating but obviously not dangerous.

And then he asked me, really matter of fact, "Do you want me to remopve that thing"? "Yes, please. That would be nice." And he just placed his thumb on it for maybe 15 seconds, smiled and said: "There you go. Do you have any others?"

Saw him into his folks house, and drove home. Never thought more about it, until the next day when the thing on my wrist was gone. That is, quite seriously, about the strangest thing that ever happened to me and it stuck in my mind ever since. I only saw the guy a couple of times more, he found water for a couple of my neighbours that summer, using rods, and late in the summer he died. As I said, this was an old guy.

[El Sordo]

Man, I miss all the good shows...

[MestaMachine]

Okay. Mods don’t want private freepmails posted. I knew when I did it I shouldn’t have. But the old thread is still up, so:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2302120/posts?page=135#135

To: Danae; null and void; Beckwith; stockpirate; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; Myrddin; ...
Sorry, Danae, but your COLB is totally bogus. Everyone on the ping list have known about it since you first posted it. I was playing along to see what your end game was going to be.

I predicted that you were going to show your COLB as proof that Hawaii can get the date-stamp screwed up. And whenever you played that card, I was ready to reveal the truth of it all .

For starters, there’s no way that anyone was going to believe that you got a 2000 COLB on a form that has a revision date of November 2001.

Secondly, there’s no way that anyone was buying that horribly-forged date stamp.

Here’s the information I sent to the ping list on 07/16 and 07/16:

I’m sending this out to the Ping list so they can be aware of what’s going on here. I’d like for all of you to keep this under wraps until I can figure out what her end game is going to be..although I know it already.

This COLB is a forgery, and a really bad one, too.

She’s testing me, first of all, to see if I can spot it as a forgery, and scond of all — and pretty stupid — is claiming that she got this in 2000 with a Mar 22 2007 stamp. The idea here is that if Hawaii could stamp a 2007 date on her 2000 COLB, then they could have also put a 2007 stamp on Obama’s 2008 COLB.

Fat chance.

The date-stamp on the back is totally bogus. You can clearly see that it was added to an existing image: a scan of a COLB folded twice into quarters. The fact that a deep fold runs right theough the middle of the date yet, the date is as straight as if it were on a perfectly flat piece of paper.

On closer examination, you can immediately see how the letters are all thin, jagged and broken apart, and surrounded by pixel haloes.

Here are some images I made that illustrate the forging:

BAD STAMP:

FOLDS ON THE BACK, BUT NOT ON THE FRONT, AND VICE-VERSA (shaded Red for better viewing):

I asked her to make a better scan — using more exposure — but I doubt if I’ll ever get it. [I didn’t]
Here’s a big animated GIF of the front side vs. the reverse side. The reverse is in green and the front is in red.

Notice along the uuper part orf the circle, the big folds on the back start to appear as flat on the front. You can see the letters along that upper quadrant get flat when going from back to front. Letters that were there on the on the bag get to disappear on thr front:

I’ll give it a day or too, and if she hasn’t responded, then break the news. [I gave you 10 days]

In case she tries to use this against me, well you already know that’s is a forgery and a ruse.

---

There are more things I could have posted, like folds and tears that were drawn in.

You should know better than to run a forgery by me

135 posted on Monday, July 27, 2009 7:31:56 PM by Polarik (Obama: When destroying America is not enough.)

[Danae]

I state here categorically that Polarik is 100% WRONG. It is a real legit Hawaiian COLB. Clearly Polarik would not know a legit COLB from Hawaii if it hit him in the face.

Unless of course he owns up to being wrong, but I am not holding my breath.

[lucysmom]

You should know better than to run a forgery by me

Well I guess Polarik's outed himself for the expert he's not.

[lucysmom]

I haven’t laughed so hard since parsy left.

[Danae]

Parsey left???

Parsey who always used third person? LOL he made me laugh so much...

But yea, If Polarik thinks my COLB is a fraud, then he indeed has shown himself to have zero knowledge on documents, forgeries, digital photography, digital scanning or anything else.

Because thats a real COLB, and I even posted the receipt from Hawaii for it.

Think I will ever get the apology I am owed?

I don’t either.