Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: browardchad

No, but the DOH has twice confirmed facts that logically mean Factcheck is a forgery.

I think we can say that it is a fact that the Factcheck COLB is a forgery - unless the DOH has been lying to us, in which case we STILL need an investigation.

I think we need to separate fact from opinion. In all these many posts, nobody has successfully refuted the claim that Okubo’s statement, together with what we observe in the birth certificates themselves, prove that Factcheck is a forgery. I invite you to try to do so, but unless you can, the conclusion is well-supported and should be accepted as fact at least unless and until some information refutes it.


2,198 posted on 03/01/2010 5:56:52 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2195 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
The conclusion is well-supported by your opinion. It's not supported by the level of facts required to generate a federal investigation of a state agency, nor does it rise to the level of evidence in a courtroom.

Unless, of course, you're an advocate of a police state, where folks can generate investigations against anyone they wish, simply based on "suspicions."

2,200 posted on 03/01/2010 6:38:36 AM PST by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson